From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id QHiCFeMgLWGnlwAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:18:11 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id sFMnEeMgLWFyOgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 18:18:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEBE2DB72 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:18:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52742 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKlrF-0006OL-Ct for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:18:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKlr8-0006Ny-Ns for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:18:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48665) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKlr8-0007kw-GM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:18:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mKlr8-0004kS-AM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50212: Several tests fail, Bash fails often. Was: Tests fail while building Guix Resent-From: Simon Streit Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 18:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50212 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxim Cournoyer Received: via spool by 50212-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50212.163034742918168 (code B ref 50212); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 18:18:02 +0000 Received: (at 50212) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Aug 2021 18:17:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60211 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mKlqG-0004ix-OH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:17:08 -0400 Received: from smtprelay05.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.28]:63497) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mKlqD-0004io-LK for 50212@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:17:06 -0400 Received: from [91.40.251.169] (helo=motorball) by smtprelay05.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mKloW-0001kc-HG; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:15:20 +0200 From: Simon Streit References: <5fed54e119c256140ccfc15baa239947c988caef.camel@telenet.be> <87o89gszxw.fsf@gmail.com> Gcc: nnfolder+archive:sent.2021-08 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:17:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87o89gszxw.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Sun, 29 Aug 2021 17:28:43 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAbmV0cGFuaWMub3Jn X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 50212@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1630347491; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=d4u1n3XJugUqee5rcVTlV1Hq1VJ7QxnVE8gj8cXAo6E=; b=GJpkW+8QFTiqo2Ch3rkC3Y67No75AvoHVjQYGmj1A/V9OaqPqirgPuhokTdSkLDYppFEmH xp0ky7dfMVZOhhiyGR6odB8R1j8ydeURLduwQVEYJXqYLsd/whoHqDaOJN21Huzh+DHPZO s44YdSzKeo4ARnRI10Fv447qmTb40YFGnQzhj8awEqfBxZos3xLJoy3dVOu2SowXEYMnOX 66tUZSxrW8lvUdpG31uJt1IAZyckTU1IbM0nLnBeH2YSHoU4zBVbnhBQoW80X8gjTKGUvK b1dJmDJ1gzRviRgM5G3Mpa2A5x3zsvF6+NIHvb11ShnqOuBA4ulSlPf660S3Mg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1630347491; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=oGhllbnm7agXwiIKsV3lA8xo/09Y3omPhgMLXz2ZNeaTrO8V9d5DkCRtRPm+WujOPL3a9F qdcksAXH8TD7y07y5Z4VFKCMYlDE+67ffFeMEUUOxuDnetJUe1FNNZiI0FSfC/sTgTFh6b jIYu7PHe45Mz0DqgkYsqrLjZ9mCUDPIh40CnPxv+6bk77niYVx+aOrDEq9ce811LrKHFsa 28guq9ry6Km1DTHVAympNNP3pXDqTO7LXRK7CqvY8uU35T9F6asxAh7aedGHQ7BUfMIAZP lrDT65lqzou04dNggYAIdtBmF8E8J2s4C2X/IN+RhrE1vasXuzi4sfyvWlb8CQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.42 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: AEBE2DB72 X-Spam-Score: -2.42 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: upwWXhPzlMFh Maxim Cournoyer writes: > I'm guessing the i386 does something bogus? Your x86_64 is already able > to run i386 code natively, AFAIK. Alright, this was my interpretation from the manual and available architectures that I just plugged it all together like that. I wasn't aware that x86_64 can run i386 natively. > The binfmt service type registers binary formats of non-native > architectures with interpreters to run them [0]; this way, when an ARM > binary is encountered on a x86_64 system, the kernel Linux knows to > launch it via QEMU, for example. Since commit > 77c2f4e2068ebec3f384c826c5a99785125ff72c, this is in effect for any > container (it used to be possible to enable it with (guix-support? #t) > on only for the container spawned by guix-daemon. I reenabled the service without it mentioning i386. Building Guix passes as expected. Thank you. Kind regards, Simon