From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id QJWHAjgawmALagEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:57:12 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id EMDDOTcawmBVLgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:57:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54A5C18AA4 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:57:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39210 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLBF-000380-3k for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:57:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52090) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLB8-00034z-CD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:57:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLB8-0002TY-4u for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:57:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLB8-0007gE-11 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#48457: linkchecker 9.4.0 fails to build Resent-From: Luis Felipe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48457 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: zimoun Cc: 48457@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 48457-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48457.162333336929460 (code B ref 48457); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:57:01 +0000 Received: (at 48457) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2021 13:56:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37465 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLAG-0007f6-Pl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:56:08 -0400 Received: from mail4.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.27]:50769) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lrLAB-0007eY-IH for 48457@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:56:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:55:55 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1623333356; bh=LvCkIN8EWQ2aFGwFnOlbai5PyxFYc4eKymalhZ5raXc=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=txWrwLbhHB6lsOh4q+EBccA9FJ0zzjs2hgKTkd/DZ9D1akKYlc4xtm3hFCTYmyzks FE2wACQaIk8wVhu/lJNDosfKKnKjmmIGJciH6qw367aPSlKRp9gYDWooEtP2a0vrI9 eI25s455g6jfqyQuQocZJMGHUOI2ZObfmy22ha3E= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <86a6nyj7bu.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86a6nyj7bu.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" Reply-to: Luis Felipe X-ACL-Warn: , Luis Felipe From: Luis Felipe via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1623333431; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=LvCkIN8EWQ2aFGwFnOlbai5PyxFYc4eKymalhZ5raXc=; b=LcRNdU6b39yt0UBpGzubWzuc+wqsC0fkfp0bqTVIPDpcVJJbXpiqSS7VW0Vm01+t954NUd tPqNEf0zZ5ZQeBDoHODPGQmFo7Z2LhV3idvOLMr1Y+VwO038djFdhzXC8miTEbyXLGJB7/ w/RehnoI/KlxTMsHSK9Y8DYLYmmEFKueaKKnHqCarpNNdL7mc/eeDLgQhPZvigWctUZlsO zGtBaVvbdn66/LL05/YIMea+Hvga7gbknn0wIXuvfu+iupjAdoHO1JtKx95G1YGuUXJjWR tb8zblncJiw1xEdmqhCCQGhynxzpC6J6wKaHcaID1rbRKJN6rkPIUhotiAi/tA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1623333431; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=BLqiDpjVowTLnNwCt+oWs+uXnzogszBCj+DDswV6EKycoCPUNgy48c1RLbMLZs45CiIvSn VTckvOe/+ytFTKMD2twfR21wQh1Y64JmasKS1l2mmJ4h+tVdIyU02DFdYSXZlF4awExdj2 17Ipzs15OUPskLkUK92nLfuaSBUO3pFVgzwfk1yZAAZ9u6CYD4uOacPY+IcJv57804k9rV e0QChdVRoEwmJGDW4Vogt7/0G220xdEGutRkjwzBF7V2UrCDZ6uowYJPsFK5Z6YwsG4DtV CsliJ+1zbs8a7ZLYlZS+tw+s9AkXdPYEN5/nS8s5Gcq4IlkBYjIP0VNN53PaPQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b=txWrwLbh; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.93 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b=txWrwLbh; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 54A5C18AA4 X-Spam-Score: -2.93 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: TMXnMjxkRtx3 On Thursday, June 10th, 2021 at 11:19 AM, zimoun = wrote: > > ERROR: In procedure scm-error: > > > > ERROR: replacement length differs from the original length "90i4g1bnh6x= blvpvr8sx3m0k66xna390-python2-urllib3-1.26.2" "45b698p4rdsfp79l3qhxzk3msja1= 4bsa-python2-python2-python2-urllib3-1.26.4" > > Since the package =E2=80=99linkchecker=E2=80=99 is a =E2=80=99python-2= =E2=80=99 package, I do not know > > if it is worth to fix. And my opinion is simply to remove it. WDYT? Oh, I didn't know Python 2 had reached its end of life. I'm not a user of t= he package, just wanted to tried it out. So, if removing it is the right th= ing to do, I'm fine with that.