From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Hinsen Subject: bug#27080: =?UTF-8?Q?=C2=A8make?= install" fails because of missing gawk Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 11:22:10 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87h907g9go.fsf@elephly.net> <920162d3-7548-5f22-21c3-893fd427e353@fastmail.net> <8737brfyzq.fsf@elephly.net> <9a1ca3b7-2eeb-15a2-6af7-a218a5de3292@fastmail.net> <87zidzefej.fsf@elephly.net> <8bc7e899-2b74-5b27-e9ff-4a49736ba946@fastmail.net> <87shjre53a.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57875) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEuPh-0003or-Pn for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2017 05:23:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEuPe-0005Lf-KU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2017 05:23:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38579) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEuPe-0005LX-49 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2017 05:23:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dEuPd-0003sz-P5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2017 05:23:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87shjre53a.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 27080@debbugs.gnu.org Ricardo Wurmus writes: > You are correct, however, that building from source and running =E2=80=9C= make > install=E2=80=9D *will* install Guix to the specified prefix. What I=E2= =80=99m pretty > sure does *not* happen, though, is that this *overwrites* any files that > Ubuntu (or any other system) uses. It is well-behaved in that it > installs things into the expected directories under the given prefix. It does put everything into the correct directories, but that doesn't prevent version conflicts with my Ubuntu installation. If I remember correctly it was the locale definitions that were not compatible. > (With the =E2=80=9Cpre-inst-env=E2=80=9D script it=E2=80=99s possible to = run Guix without > installing it, so you don=E2=80=99t even have to run =E2=80=9Cmake instal= l=E2=80=9D at all if > you just want to bootstrap Guix.) That's a useful suggestion, thanks! All I want to do is develop my own package definitions, and eventually contribute them to the official distribution. All I need is a way to run Guix-from-source under my user account. Konrad.