From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net>
Subject: bug#34998: "guix pull" fails because it cannot build a derivation
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 17:41:16 +0100
Message-ID: <m1wokl7fmb.fsf@khs-macbook.home>
References: <m1lg12c7we.fsf@fastmail.net> <87lg114oc5.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35116)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1h8p9H-00043G-9i
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:42:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1h8p9G-00069I-Hb
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:42:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46941)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1h8p9G-00068y-7C
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:42:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.34998.D34998.155361848531585@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87lg114oc5.fsf@elephly.net>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: 34998-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Ricardo,

>> Today's "guix pull" ended in a failure that I am supposed to report, so
>> here I do!
>
> This has already been fixed.  Please try again!

I had done so after reading Ludo's comment, and it works fine now!

Thanks,
 Konrad.