From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id cIvTJr+YW1/VVgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:33:19 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id EN8/Ib+YW19pOwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:33:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F99794021E for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:33:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59312 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGl36-0007Tr-RA for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:33:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGl2s-0007Tf-Sf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:33:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33622) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGl2s-0007tK-H5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:33:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGl2s-0007eA-Cy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43331: guix repl doesn't find the script to execute Resent-From: Konrad Hinsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43331 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 43331@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 43331-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43331.159983832929332 (code B ref 43331); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:33:02 +0000 Received: (at 43331) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2020 15:32:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45168 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGl20-0007d2-Pl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:32:09 -0400 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:45503) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGl1y-0007cV-TU for 43331@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:32:08 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7377B2; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:32:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:32:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.net; h= from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:cc:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm1; bh=ULe+m1vLB7VXSvh3w8O/j+f5DP csoolkHyijtFBHe+M=; b=FhfmydVYtylgTEIVCf9AidmWosi7qBn3RHKJIU3Y3E 9cTRGWDk1UJJ379JQlU+HchKSOg3lrfKpRmdllCZtmp3BClvvIBukmhnt7zVZFCq sNKWg+poUAvBivLwGwfGM/egNyeAPOFEbsICcj+izXFLdOdDVKeAPw89+eR7bTyx Ls1Wnv5+Ono+2QcbYd0CEJE44sj7zeFigqzH7JzNjfNS/c9GMKeFkgcdNRcsOH4o Fe72n+/P1k+vBR0sCsQNYUJgGlBahL7nOQ5dzKUqEGH7BO6zNY6wBu/LDb+gyg7+ XfnNQEwZRAimuKKIrOzzfb4Bn0l9J3jkCQSQ1hiEVhvw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=ULe+m1 vLB7VXSvh3w8O/j+f5DPcsoolkHyijtFBHe+M=; b=FD+2I/Za7NxMz60dKNYddD 6/8MrM2whkRZKjDHBV6l/tLI/0aGiOe2/wCb7qRLMEX/p9ugKASGVM1vuFQX3/pH sGoeyehrwnGvWirH2iDn7RrkCesW9KsIyLktAtVyRgmYVPBnXE250zeZ8gnu6Kyf uEp5Ei8pTq/Rr2t7y8Fb9X/cmI4BPM9R3oC2G6vqbT0wTAs9h5tGikScufQKDyNV x2XneAQ7D5H918h7jl7ED64VZwMAjJa4uQ61ybbwy858/pD7tcWn7+NoRmwtV1Cq 6T86czmKuEjJPwuF6e2703aVmONumG+wyUnQ7Du54s21av5UjbFGkgFkIPyhWbDw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudehledgledvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffujghffffkgggtsehttdertd dttddtnecuhfhrohhmpefmohhnrhgrugcujfhinhhsvghnuceokhhonhhrrggurdhhihhn shgvnhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeikeejjeevue eifeejhedtgeethfdutefgveffhfeuheejveeiieegvdfhtdeifeenucfkphepkeeirddv feekrddufeekrdelgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehkohhnrhgrugdrhhhinhhsvghnsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from ordinateur-de-catherine--konrad.home (lfbn-idf2-1-907-94.w86-238.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.238.138.94]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B8CCC3280063; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:31:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Konrad Hinsen In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:31:58 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=fastmail.net header.s=fm1 header.b=FhfmydVY; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=FD+2I/Za; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=fastmail.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: eIo+FpagC9st Hi Simon, > It sounds similar to the recent #42543 [1]. I proposed the fix [2] > using 'canonicalize-path' but Ludo was not fine with it and then > committed d10474c38d58bdc676e64336769dc2e00cdfa8ed [3]. Thanks for the references, all that happened while I was on vacation. There is indeed some parallel, but also an important difference: the -L option requires searching LOADPATH plus following local relative filenames. "guix repl" does not search LOADPATH. But I am happy I didn't use 'canonicalize-path' in my patch ;-) Cheers, Konrad.