From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6IDbGsPYoGCNbQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 16 May 2021 10:33:07 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 0N18FsPYoGBDWQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 16 May 2021 08:33:07 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EA8411DF5 for ; Sun, 16 May 2021 10:33:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47046 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liCCu-0006xs-Jo for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 04:33:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58284) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liCAx-0002nC-0L for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 04:31:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38113) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liCAw-0000W5-MU for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 04:31:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liCAw-0001cw-JT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 04:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#48376: Failure in "guix pull" Resent-From: Konrad Hinsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 08:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48376 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxim Cournoyer Received: via spool by 48376-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48376.16211538426208 (code B ref 48376); Sun, 16 May 2021 08:31:02 +0000 Received: (at 48376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2021 08:30:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49655 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liCAb-0001c4-Nk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 04:30:41 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:55169) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liCAZ-0001bq-FJ for 48376@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 04:30:39 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F495C0116; Sun, 16 May 2021 04:30:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 16 May 2021 04:30:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm3; bh=sdoVGRRxs7ayV5Bqf1OLZJYSU+ klpJkjdvS2ygAudkI=; b=U02unc9Z0+ds9zjYhGbhUr8GyPhpicn6MGRKJsjmgE TB5Xc1qBiDXAWY0Ik8syKZhZ+jSh8zh4/cVsbofoA83oJKiNR7QuwvYjrYCD0cWo 1o3w1ceN8apV+gia9ykzIp5O22466+16gI3pwMcf2sIo5eA//aollI/6WFrL/CcR zaUNM2946EouSMTS1AOyxR9r9McZ1AcEAQ7T9drUnrwPcp+wZLhB48dxg2Qg84VL FQ5jVBoGN7CWQ0E75+/FFAB26MXsEXEdNuDtETwf0AwYd0zuOVz+08iEUs55cyN3 WicZBZ/G96Jqe4zs+HAjKcA1CNCT2xwf+VBASDspyYAg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=sdoVGR Rxs7ayV5Bqf1OLZJYSU+klpJkjdvS2ygAudkI=; b=d0a5bmvfsU40FZobxfK5zB M1MBzIiv5Tuy8B43uYIaqILiNboENO1l4xyjclu/wy2dj2eTgCobzaoeXvwYGtMg 0in4QNp+kCpiUlxt8hl/sa/63N/s2IQASo4lZgH0l1SVf5yhU7mwEbTxyfgBhW1K pPeKfg2HvlesaqzjWaENPMLR+XBpI6oKs2ifQbi8vJ9p8ZidEL6Orr+JPAAMWD3h Lt5hxbzOI95uuMYYY88PQ0vwS5odb7hqx33wZCpXtZuRgcvnIx3VSvWww1RS9nSu ga2poNU1W68Fmz1hTrd10uWdwt4Sl+0MtxXv0O5ksiT31uukxeAbvTCe8UOZkR4Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdeifedgtdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfhffkfggtgesthdtredttddttdenucfhrhhomhepmfhonhhrrggu ucfjihhnshgvnhcuoehkohhnrhgrugdrhhhinhhsvghnsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrnhgvth eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieekjeejveeuieefjeehtdegtefhudetgfevfffhueeh jeevieeigedvhfdtieefnecukfhppeekiedrvdegiedrudelledrudejleenucevlhhush htvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehkohhnrhgrugdrhhhi nhhsvghnsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from ordinateur-de-catherine--konrad.home (lfbn-idf2-1-496-179.w86-246.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.246.199.179]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 16 May 2021 04:30:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Konrad Hinsen In-Reply-To: <87wns0692p.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87wns0692p.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 10:30:31 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 48376@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1621153986; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=sdoVGRRxs7ayV5Bqf1OLZJYSU+klpJkjdvS2ygAudkI=; b=LoELgxK/bJHBnmpe/+YGXXcU575yRQBG6aRqab5mV3L8DXzzTruozynWEgEvMM/4azZlE6 SvamMDvIRv6BMESNaj7At1R1A6NwHw46X4xsv8bnBEVA/y4Y3P2OfsNGDc4Fi41pQIJmVJ ZpGqbOB7EwnBkvWqCrfPKrqltSq/Rz+8C7JKybMLiamPp3XGLLAObo+7KkVZzjjlS5/LMw m2a0oOfYNyf7XJDlvc/tIMjoLzkHRfI9jVozL1dL5NK+acEjFJXolg1jDRjtW18OUuCUsH j0zWu5Qt7ckZH4ZgxEb6s9T3UrW1AIuBoprdxzmD1MNgdJlCv3rVnDk+XSFKKg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1621153986; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=EKLsSGRxlPywlsAEYN6RnXVpWB24HMOiYWJDpz6JrgD2e7GsmivgXVokBJP0wyOgDVwEOe OsgUAoYnfRRw/IHcKH9gROA/HEtfsY27GYW2oEAZyi2SIH8LVvNeyx7B9QzIP5mvIF5fXB gTENbsagxenJIDDScAMwKUOjNWP6plCUkzoWai4cFBC3LUWMk6Dq6pSXxWXtM3Y5j8G/39 rzbNXrh8+Fykov1Y50ymDPdNUCjtci6IcLJS1PDlcMGNmI40bR3te1Q5fQ9EBdjAT5pA4A ARPtxv9/i/FkVfVAiJTI1JffWYP8FCYpkwe3+x3/qdXNuRL/AHOctarXMmLA6A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=fastmail.net header.s=fm3 header.b=U02unc9Z; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=d0a5bmvf; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=fastmail.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.15 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=fastmail.net header.s=fm3 header.b=U02unc9Z; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=d0a5bmvf; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=fastmail.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7EA8411DF5 X-Spam-Score: 0.15 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: dwoChHBXS7Gi Hi Maxim, Thanks for your reply! > Indeed. I note that the error message that leads to a request to the > bug report mention it could be due to a network failure, which could > explain the transient nature of the problem we see here. > > Had you tried multiple times in a row with the same failure on that > commit? Yes, I tried again later on two different machines, without any problem. The reason I submitted a bug report is because Guix told me so. I assumed that even if the root cause was a network issue, something had then happened that shouldn't happen. If that's not the case, then the error message should be improved. A minimal improvement would be to say "Please report unless you see a comment about networking issues above.". Cheers, Konrad.