From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Subject: bug#24670: Unexpected EOF reading a line (from guix pull) [forward]
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:17:30 +0200
Message-ID: <idjwphbvzmd.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
References: <20161011223407.GA31313@khaalida>
	<8760oycwno.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20161012070258.GA12645@khaalida>
	<87y41s8ybd.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<idjbmyoxzgx.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
	<87k2dbvlhd.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<idj37jzxmxf.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
	<87twcfp44d.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<idjzim7w3i3.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
	<87r37jp1dj.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51606)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bv2NF-0005SP-J3
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:18:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bv2N9-0001ZP-0d
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:18:09 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48712)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bv2N8-0001Z3-M4
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:18:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bv2N8-0000w5-Hl
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:18:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.24670.B24670.14764510613563@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87r37jp1dj.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Cc: 24670@debbugs.gnu.org, dian_cecht@zoho.com


ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:

> It is impossible to reproduce exactly the system which caused the bug,
> but I will try to reproduce it as good as you can with Gentoo.

I chuckled a little.  It’s ironic because with Guix we actually can
reproduce systems with relative ease :)

Which is why I suggest trying the official installation method.  If the
user can reproduce this with the official release we could actually
investigate this better.  If this is specific to a third-party package
of Guix it doesn’t really belong here, in my opinion.

~~ Ricardo