From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Subject: bug#25852: Users not updating their installations of Guix
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:52:07 +0100
Message-ID: <idjpohu1mqw.fsf@bimsb-sys02.mdc-berlin.net>
References: <20170223211156.GA24382@jasmine>
	<20170304202941.sgeprky4l2lda7xt@penguin>
	<20170304224359.GA18077@jasmine>
	<20170305075641.76f4mznuod2gztdi@penguin>
	<20170305092511.GA9142@mail.thebird.nl>
	<20170305094327.3m67twgmae6nyloq@penguin>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52271)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1cku1V-0008Ly-Aq
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 09:54:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1cku1S-00015K-A7
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 09:54:05 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43767)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1cku1S-00015A-5d
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 09:54:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1cku1R-0005L9-SI
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 09:54:01 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.25852.B25852.148881201620494@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170305094327.3m67twgmae6nyloq@penguin>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=C4=8Cech?= <sleep_walker@gnu.org>
Cc: 25852@debbugs.gnu.org


Tomáš Čech <sleep_walker@gnu.org> writes:

> My expectation is that when `guix pull' is run, it should update whole
> guix, not just part (guix - guix-daemon).

[…]

> Removing the surprise can be […] by […] making `guix pull' able to update
> guix-daemon as well.

That’s what is planned for “guix pull” anyway IIRC.  I suspect this
would be easier if we had a daemon written in Guile.

--
Ricardo Wurmus