Ludovic Courtès schreef op do 12-05-2022 om 10:18 [+0200]:
> To me, the conclusion is that the package has a invalid URI, so it’s not
> a Guix bug strictly speaking.  However, we could change
> gnu-maintenance.scm so that it deals with invalid URIs gracefully.
> 
> Thoughts?

Maybe emit a warning and skip them?  Or just skip them (by returning
#false in the is-it-a-gnu-package procedure)?

Extending Guile to support IRIs can be left for later I think.

Greetings,
Maxime.