From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: sirgazil
Subject: bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 10:17:34 -0500
Message-ID:
References: <39c35b21c4edc31b948f5b29c6f321a1@openmailbox.org>
<721a2b27-4274-3809-0c25-c3e4de756e90@zoho.com>
<87tvx2buei.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path:
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52945)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from ) id 1eNguB-0003Sx-FX
for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:19:08 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from ) id 1eNgu6-000551-Go
for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:19:07 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45298)
by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from )
id 1eNgu6-00054x-D6
for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:19:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from ) id 1eNgu6-0002Kz-4T
for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:19:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit"
Resent-Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <87tvx2buei.fsf@gnu.org>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix"
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=
Cc: 24981@debbugs.gnu.org
On 07/12/17 07:21, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello,
>
> sirgazil skribis:
>
>> With the new website online, all pages pass the HTML validation,
>> except for the Packages page, which has a
tag for no opened P
>> element in every package description,
>
> Oh, how’s that possible? A bug in Guile’s ‘sxml->xml’?
I just fixed this one. It was a mistake in the packages template (using
a DIV element inside a P element).
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/commit/?id=61b79b7fdd5a2a5bbaae7f53891e489ffa28fc95
>> and uses obsolete TT element in links to patches.
>
> I didn’t know is obsolete. Would be OK here?
>
> We’d need to adjust Guile’s stexi modules accordingly.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>