From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sirgazil Subject: bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 10:17:34 -0500 Message-ID: References: <39c35b21c4edc31b948f5b29c6f321a1@openmailbox.org> <721a2b27-4274-3809-0c25-c3e4de756e90@zoho.com> <87tvx2buei.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52945) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNguB-0003Sx-FX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:19:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNgu6-000551-Go for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:19:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45298) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNgu6-00054x-D6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:19:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNgu6-0002Kz-4T for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:19:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87tvx2buei.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 24981@debbugs.gnu.org On 07/12/17 07:21, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello, > > sirgazil skribis: > >> With the new website online, all pages pass the HTML validation, >> except for the Packages page, which has a

tag for no opened P >> element in every package description, > > Oh, how’s that possible? A bug in Guile’s ‘sxml->xml’? I just fixed this one. It was a mistake in the packages template (using a DIV element inside a P element). https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/commit/?id=61b79b7fdd5a2a5bbaae7f53891e489ffa28fc95 >> and uses obsolete TT element in links to patches. > > I didn’t know is obsolete. Would be OK here? > > We’d need to adjust Guile’s stexi modules accordingly. > > Thanks, > Ludo’. >