bug#25045: [Website] Packages page takes too long to load

["Luis Felipe López Acevedo" <felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org>]

On 2016-11-28 12:00, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote:
> Hi Luis,
> 
> Indeed, I had a first bash at solving this problem by providing a set 
> of
> static html pages paginated by the first letter of the package name.
> 
> I'm not particularly wedded to this solution, so if you feel strongly
> about going another way, I'd be keen to hear/see about it.
> 
> In the meantime, I'm open to testing/feedback.  I will unfortunately 
> not
> be able to put work into this until at least Saturday/Sunday, as some
> Perl work has higher priority at the moment.
> 
> But let me know if you have questions or feedback!
> 
> Best wishes,

Hi, Alex :)

The solution I had in mind includes an alphabetic index, and pagination 
as well. However, it includes a few more things, and would take some 
time to design and implement. So I think we should use your patch to fix 
the size issue as soon as possible.


For what is worth, this is what I had in mind:

/packages/
First page of the list of packages. Packages listed here only provide a 
summary: package logo (if any), name, version, description, and an 
indicator if it has issues. This page also has filters to find packages 
(for now, alphabetic filter. In the future, category filter, and search 
box).

/packages/page/N/
Page N of the list of packages.

/packages/a/
First page of the list of packages whose name starts with A. Packages 
are presented the same way as in /packages/.

/packages/a/page/N/
Page N of the list of packages starting with letter A.

/packages/icecat/X.Y.Z/
Page with details about IceCat version X.Y.Z. It includes all the 
information about this package, including its issues (which are 
currently listed in a separate page along with the issues of other 
packages: /packages/issues.html). Including the issues of a package in 
its detail page could avoid having the current issues page grow too 
much, like the current Packages page.

This static pagination and filtering would generate A LOT of pages, but 
of reasonable size for web browsers to load.

Best,


-- 
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/