From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arun Isaac Subject: bug#27491: Indentation issue in emacs Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:46:56 +0530 Message-ID: References: <87tw32bo5g.fsf@gmail.com> <8bc87dab.AEAAMA4zZSgAAAAAAAAAAAO2CsUAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZUffQ@mailjet.com> <87zicss30x.fsf@gmail.com> <87y3s970gh.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47427) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRkNh-00044w-AS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 15:18:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRkNe-0007DV-4b for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 15:18:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46337) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRkNe-0007DR-1n for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 15:18:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dRkNd-0002WU-Sp for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2017 15:18:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <87y3s970gh.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: Alex Kost , 27491-done@debbugs.gnu.org Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Alex Kost writes: > >> Arun Isaac (2017-06-27 11:44 +0530) wrote: >> >>> Ok, fixed! :-) >>> >>> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=2482c02f3b23b2490a6647e0717cf8a4ccf3f6a8 >>> >>> However, I think this is a hack, and the better solution would be to >>> actually fix the underlying indentation issue. But, I am too lazy to >>> find out how. :-P >> >> I'm not sure what you mean by a "fix". This is an Emacs issue, and it >> was there since... I don't know, always. Moreover, I don't think it's a >> bug; it's just how Emacs finds a beginning of the top-level sexp – it >> "sees" a leading parenthesis on a line and it considers it to be a >> beginning of the sexp. > > I consider this a bug. Surely Emacs could do better here — especially > since this is a lisp mode! > > @Arun, would you like to report this as a bug to the Emacs developers? Sure, I'll do that.