* bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test
@ 2016-11-21 19:29 Luis Felipe López Acevedo
2016-11-23 21:45 ` Ludovic Courtès
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Luis Felipe López Acevedo @ 2016-11-21 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 24981
Steps to reproduce
==================
1. Go to https://validator.w3.org/
2. For each page in the website: validate by URI
Unexpected behavior
===================
All pages are marked as [Invalid]
Expected behavior
=================
All pages are marked as valid HTML 5 (Document checking completed. No
errors or warnings to show.)
Additional information
======================
Most of the errors happen because of a missing Doctype declaration. It
seems all pages built with Haunt have this problem, while the
packages[1] and packages issues[2] pages, generated with a different
mechanism, do include the document type.
There are other errors not related to the document type declaration in
the packages-related pages.[1][2] Mostly, obsolete elements or
attributes, and missing closing tags.
[1]: https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages
[2]: https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/packages/issues.html
--
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test
2016-11-21 19:29 bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test Luis Felipe López Acevedo
@ 2016-11-23 21:45 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-11-24 0:25 ` Luis Felipe López Acevedo
2017-12-06 19:06 ` sirgazil
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2016-11-23 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luis Felipe López Acevedo; +Cc: 24981, David Thompson
Hello!
Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org> skribis:
> Steps to reproduce
> ==================
>
> 1. Go to https://validator.w3.org/
> 2. For each page in the website: validate by URI
>
>
> Unexpected behavior
> ===================
>
> All pages are marked as [Invalid]
Oops.
> Most of the errors happen because of a missing Doctype declaration. It
> seems all pages built with Haunt have this problem, while the
> packages[1] and packages issues[2] pages, generated with a different
> mechanism, do include the document type.
I see you already fixed this one the same way I’d have done it. :-)
> There are other errors not related to the document type declaration in
> the packages-related pages.[1][2] Mostly, obsolete elements or
> attributes, and missing closing tags.
This is underway too, right?
Ludo’, who likes self-fixing bugs. :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test
2016-11-23 21:45 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2016-11-24 0:25 ` Luis Felipe López Acevedo
2016-11-24 9:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Luis Felipe López Acevedo @ 2016-11-24 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ludo; +Cc: 24981, David Thompson
On 2016-11-23 16:45, ludo@gnu.org wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org> skribis:
>
>> There are other errors not related to the document type declaration in
>> the packages-related pages.[1][2] Mostly, obsolete elements or
>> attributes, and missing closing tags.
>
> This is underway too, right?
Yes. The ones on the Packages issues page will get fix with the fix for
<https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22115>, and then I'll
check what's wrong with the Packages page.
> Ludo’, who likes self-fixing bugs. :-)
:)
--
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test
2016-11-24 0:25 ` Luis Felipe López Acevedo
@ 2016-11-24 9:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2016-11-24 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luis Felipe López Acevedo; +Cc: 24981
Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org> skribis:
> On 2016-11-23 16:45, ludo@gnu.org wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lopez@openmailbox.org> skribis:
>>
>>> There are other errors not related to the document type declaration in
>>> the packages-related pages.[1][2] Mostly, obsolete elements or
>>> attributes, and missing closing tags.
>>
>> This is underway too, right?
>
> Yes. The ones on the Packages issues page will get fix with the fix
> for <https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22115>, and then
> I'll check what's wrong with the Packages page.
Awesome. I can update the other pages with CVS when you deem
appropriate, if you don’t feel like fiddling with CVS yourself.
Thanks!
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test
2016-11-21 19:29 bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test Luis Felipe López Acevedo
2016-11-23 21:45 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2017-12-06 19:06 ` sirgazil
2017-12-07 12:21 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-02-06 17:08 ` sirgazil
2019-02-08 14:14 ` sirgazil
3 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: sirgazil @ 2017-12-06 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 24981
With the new website online, all pages pass the HTML validation, except
for the Packages page, which has a </p> tag for no opened P element in
every package description, and uses obsolete TT element in links to patches.
https://validator.w3.org/nu/?doc=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gnu.org%2Fsoftware%2Fguix%2Fpackages%2F
--
https://sirgazil.bitbucket.io/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test
2017-12-06 19:06 ` sirgazil
@ 2017-12-07 12:21 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-12-07 13:33 ` sirgazil
2017-12-09 15:17 ` sirgazil
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2017-12-07 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sirgazil; +Cc: 24981
Hello,
sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com> skribis:
> With the new website online, all pages pass the HTML validation,
> except for the Packages page, which has a </p> tag for no opened P
> element in every package description,
Oh, how’s that possible? A bug in Guile’s ‘sxml->xml’?
> and uses obsolete TT element in links to patches.
I didn’t know <tt> is obsolete. Would <code> be OK here?
We’d need to adjust Guile’s stexi modules accordingly.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test
2017-12-07 12:21 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2017-12-07 13:33 ` sirgazil
2017-12-09 15:17 ` sirgazil
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: sirgazil @ 2017-12-07 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: 24981
On 07/12/17 07:21, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello,
>
> sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com> skribis:
>
>> With the new website online, all pages pass the HTML validation,
>> except for the Packages page, which has a </p> tag for no opened P
>> element in every package description,
>
> Oh, how’s that possible? A bug in Guile’s ‘sxml->xml’?
I haven't take a look at the code yet. But I plan to do so after I
upgrade Guix to 0.14.
>> and uses obsolete TT element in links to patches.
>
> I didn’t know <tt> is obsolete. Would <code> be OK here?
>
Depending on the meaning of the texinfo command that is converted to TT
one could use CODE, a SPAN with a class or any of the other elements
recommended here:
https://www.w3.org/TR/html5/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features.
> We’d need to adjust Guile’s stexi modules accordingly.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test
2017-12-07 12:21 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-12-07 13:33 ` sirgazil
@ 2017-12-09 15:17 ` sirgazil
2017-12-09 21:15 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: sirgazil @ 2017-12-09 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: 24981
On 07/12/17 07:21, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello,
>
> sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com> skribis:
>
>> With the new website online, all pages pass the HTML validation,
>> except for the Packages page, which has a </p> tag for no opened P
>> element in every package description,
>
> Oh, how’s that possible? A bug in Guile’s ‘sxml->xml’?
I just fixed this one. It was a mistake in the packages template (using
a DIV element inside a P element).
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/commit/?id=61b79b7fdd5a2a5bbaae7f53891e489ffa28fc95
>> and uses obsolete TT element in links to patches.
>
> I didn’t know <tt> is obsolete. Would <code> be OK here?
>
> We’d need to adjust Guile’s stexi modules accordingly.
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test
2016-11-21 19:29 bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test Luis Felipe López Acevedo
2016-11-23 21:45 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-12-06 19:06 ` sirgazil
@ 2019-02-06 17:08 ` sirgazil
2019-02-08 22:00 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-02-08 14:14 ` sirgazil
3 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: sirgazil @ 2019-02-06 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 24981
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 983 bytes --]
Hi,
This issue is solved in the website repository now. The following
commits fix remaining validation errors related to the use of the
obsolete TT element:
* 13a1a5a41df9eae7d3ca54c6ab4774c7804dba45
<https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/commit/?id=38ba9baa9162e4060160c03d0827787c9f52e26c>
* 38ba9baa9162e4060160c03d0827787c9f52e26c
<https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/commit/?id=38ba9baa9162e4060160c03d0827787c9f52e26c>
And the following commit fixes a validation error related to using a P
element as a container of DIV elements:
b951df49798db870aab5ebd4c63d70d2d0c6c8cf
<https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/commit/?id=b951df49798db870aab5ebd4c63d70d2d0c6c8cf>
I think once these changes are deployed to gnu.org and guix.info this
issue can be closed.
P. S.: I would deploy it myself, but I don't remember how to do it in
the case of gnu.org, and I don't have information about guix.info.
:)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1357 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test
2016-11-21 19:29 bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test Luis Felipe López Acevedo
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2019-02-06 17:08 ` sirgazil
@ 2019-02-08 14:14 ` sirgazil
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: sirgazil @ 2019-02-08 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 24981-done
Fixed. Changes published.
--
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.io/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-02-08 22:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-11-21 19:29 bug#24981: [Website] All pages fail the HTML validation test Luis Felipe López Acevedo
2016-11-23 21:45 ` Ludovic Courtès
2016-11-24 0:25 ` Luis Felipe López Acevedo
2016-11-24 9:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-12-06 19:06 ` sirgazil
2017-12-07 12:21 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-12-07 13:33 ` sirgazil
2017-12-09 15:17 ` sirgazil
2017-12-09 21:15 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-02-06 17:08 ` sirgazil
2019-02-08 22:00 ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-02-08 14:14 ` sirgazil
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).