From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id gJCMF4i+ImWcEAEA9RJhRA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 08 Oct 2023 16:36:56 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id gJCMF4i+ImWcEAEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 08 Oct 2023 16:36:56 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F7E566DB3 for ; Sun, 8 Oct 2023 16:36:56 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=Q7eYNm5z; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1696775816; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=Cs+LurzUkuBRcdr6wOnlT1mBs+GtntpnC+bqqETq0WU=; b=gUDkNnpZJQR7hmQk9xKbMBiEmswd+YBcvoVjkTjwHSSY2h/jWkG2mT90hP5HtZ21zU3O7M TXs//H+6A08hotc1ucMCaIH69QnPJxBA/1VRwZ6HLe8UC7UNckdpw1xvHOL3kwfOPF/D9M aU0SRZ7JZdvpv4M/mqXxtYZitAIhxAoI8CDbUt4VFgPsoVmZPaSNTgsj1aa/ND7YivNDwM 9b+rCDt/ABKxXNL+5NS68pzJksJL0xYtEpwTXiqlvYl0LMISvvJidsG/gbmNEFJNfZM9m9 ddGOrYUOvhoMgVI3xLmctMDp3l0aSc8uUieOf0IuhSPdok4nvSISWdtIDXwxGA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=Q7eYNm5z; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1696775816; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=rGkZglTljOSiBbWP8HFUSfudyp1E5NzixBZLg/6w2CZQCHyY0jc6nXQUdxbWgBAmae8Ktx DZByXZ3zp9Vg+abvkAthltdPF4hxX8c8FIF/A29O+tzm/WElcYQeJ13OtR30IqNurChyY+ nUcxGYMEGn4TDuVig3E5UFfazEMQET9UAhlyoYECiRQ2Y93Swo/pGAu5A/Kv224/4VOyT0 BQjn3Nbwol4xWgP3ZMgITA/bML0BhZ5sCPKpnXL3uZPapnGzoukjrO4IOV8PLM71306gT7 iZNppCVS3GaTVxNPijLCeGK0ew9OEN6f2MLl+0m9ZQIQ2UpOnw8IsUFPitQeag== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qpUtg-0006AL-9Z; Sun, 08 Oct 2023 10:36:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qpUte-0006AC-KB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2023 10:36:43 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qpUte-0000ho-BA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2023 10:36:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qpUty-0002Sc-4d for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2023 10:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#61882: emacs-next-pgtk does not find emacs-org-roam, other path issues Resent-From: Csepp Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 14:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61882 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 61882-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Csepp Received: via spool by 61882-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D61882.16967758139441 (code D ref 61882); Sun, 08 Oct 2023 14:37:02 +0000 Received: (at 61882-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2023 14:36:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58246 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qpUto-0002SD-L9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2023 10:36:53 -0400 Received: from mx0.riseup.net ([198.252.153.6]:50054) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qpUtn-0002Ry-9H for 61882-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2023 10:36:52 -0400 Received: from fews01-sea.riseup.net (fews01-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.109]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx0.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4S3PqY1LHQz9sYT; Sun, 8 Oct 2023 14:36:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1696775785; bh=N74nSsWO1/OSVzNGWAczXm1aHp0d7j5Kv/eihuRCnJU=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From; b=Q7eYNm5z+js0HWjyXaN46qY6xre5XUDbNAOhKWa8GXhsx/okqbchGsY2sKYkD0Iwy yuGImAJPfAsciLfaDuhq/72GuGrLWjnVgoox0Q0Q86zo7Vdh2zyBROMWTQUOZeuuna QoW4M0FFVPx1z4MdgBLPni9cud2Mln8nG5ZOFUts= X-Riseup-User-ID: A90ED5F54C5FD24A2F2E7ECE00908EB2995377D4246DAB135CCE5A8926D536BA Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews01-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4S3PqX391DzJmlV; Sun, 8 Oct 2023 14:36:24 +0000 (UTC) References: <87bkld896j.fsf@riseup.net> <875ya92dpz.fsf@riseup.net> <87v8bn3xnk.fsf_-_@gmail.com> From: Csepp Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 16:29:36 +0200 In-reply-to: <87v8bn3xnk.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0F7E566DB3 X-Spam-Score: 4.16 X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 4.16 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx1.migadu.com X-TUID: xJSMkLhgJpxZ Maxim Cournoyer writes: > tags 61882 +notabug > quit I don't think notabug applies until we actually know the root cause. > Hello, > > Csepp writes: > >> (Jump forward a bit, this is a bit stream-of-consciousness-y, I >> wrote >> things down as I was debugging things. TLDR: profile got corrupted >> somehow, it's not related to the packages themselves.) >> >> Certain packages like flatpak do not get installed in my main user >> profile for some unknown reason. >> So far they are: >> * gallery-dl >> * flatpak >> * emacs-org-roam >> >> It has been happening for at least a month across several pulls. >> >> If I export a manifest and load it in either guix shell -m or guix >> package -m to a different profile, bin/flatpak exists, if I do guix >> package -m without a profile argument or with the profile set to the >> default user profile, bin/flatpak is missing. >> >> The packages that are broken are always the same. >> >> If I create a manifest with only the broken packages, guix package >> -I >> reports exactly those packages, but when I look in >> ~/.guix-profile/bin >> it still has a bunch of other packages in it. >> >> So it seems the profile is frozen? I have no idea how this could >> happen. >> >> guix package --list-generations reports three generations, but there >> is >> only one generation in my home directory, called >> .guix-profile-1-link. >> >> There is also a .guix-profile.lock, maybe that's related? >> I see no lock for the other profile with the same manifest. >> >> Removed the lock, tried guix package -m again, still don't have >> flatpak, >> still only one generation symlink. >> >> Deleted all the symlinks, ran guix package -m, now it works. >> >> I'm gonna hold off on running the GC for a few days, if anyone has >> an >> idea of where the bug is and wants me to upload some files, I can do >> it >> until then. >> For my own reference, this is the store item of the broken profile: >> /gnu/store/0w3jxl95cchxn14zph3lmnqwmijf8971-profile > > Did you have any corruption at the FS level or something equally bad? > Were you using a different Guix in between the 'guix package -m' > attempts? If the profile was in the cache, it wouldn't rebuild it, > and you'd be stuck with your broken version. > > I'm closing this, as I we don't have much to push the > investigation further, but if you have a more precise idea of what > happened and ways to reproduce that do reopen. I'm pretty sure I already went through these, but once again, to be sure: - no there was no file system corruption as far as I could tell - store was checked for corruption multiple times - the issue persisted through multiple guix pulls - only one profile was affected