From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Langlois Subject: bug#33772: StumpWM broken commands? Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 14:56:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: <878t0pqol1.fsf@dustycloud.org> <8736qvhym3.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1k67uz1.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87o99iwmuo.fsf@gmail.com> <87d0px7hv8.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87sgyty3ka.fsf@dustycloud.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46007) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZdHZ-0005g7-TL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:57:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZdHU-0007dm-CY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:57:09 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50690) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZdHT-0007dP-Uv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:57:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gZdHT-0000ZD-LO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:57:03 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <87sgyty3ka.fsf@dustycloud.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Christopher Lemmer Webber Cc: 33772@debbugs.gnu.org, Alex Kost Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > >> Pierre Langlois writes: >> >>> Alex Kost writes: >>> >>>> I have built stumpwm from the latest commit (which is one commit after >>>> 18.11 release) and tried it on GuixSD and on ArchLinux. Works for me >>>> on both systems, so it's probably not an upstream bug. >>> >>> Hi Alex, >>> >>> I was investigating just now and thought I'd try that one commit that >>> was pushed after the release. The description doesn't sound like it >>> would fix the problem but it was easy to try that. But it looks like it >>> does fix the problem! >>> >>> Can you confirm the attached patch works for you? >>> >> I haven't tried it yet but it makes a lot of sense that this would fix >> it. Both gnew and eval interactively pull up a request for a line of >> input. > > I applied your patch to my machine and it fixed it... thank you! I > pushed the patch upstream to guix master. Awesome, thanks! Pierre