From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
Subject: bug#39204: r-rgdal: Reading of vector GIS data causes segfault
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:42:37 +0530
Message-ID: <cu7k14grvey.fsf@systemreboot.net>
References: <20200120154302.ijni47ou4fk4wd77@wzguix>
 <CAJ3okZ2=gYbTTHoYtn=d+mJjorzqYgHYZGwdF=4KrG2_zSJBvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ3okZ0jVL9B-SjH63=LXZ-79=t00Ppb_dwyU_XxcS381MJUAw@mail.gmail.com>
 <cu7tv3lrxpq.fsf@systemreboot.net>
 <CAJ3okZ3h_3HZ79T3WKmC68BzXeK6oBE8N9erxwG2gkycDVhbbg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45978)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j57C1-0004w4-1R
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:14:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j57Bz-0004JP-75
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:14:04 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40527)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1j57Bx-0004FB-TF
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:14:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j57Bx-0002ld-Oa
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:14:01 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.39204.B39204.158228718310552@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ3okZ3h_3HZ79T3WKmC68BzXeK6oBE8N9erxwG2gkycDVhbbg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: 39204@debbugs.gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


>> >  2. a regression of r-rgdal introduced by your commit
>> > f9d328833fc1f5d0fb76b61b12d1a3cb013932e6
>>
>> Replacing proj.4 with proj in the r-rgdal package seems to fix this
>> regression. Can you confirm?
>
> Maybe, but it is not what the user expects. Upstream explicitly
> mentions proj.4, see [1].

> [1] https://cloud.r-project.org/web/packages/rgdal/index.html

No, upstream says that both proj (aka proj6) and proj.4 are
supported. Quoting [1],

"From 'rgdal' 1.4.1, provision is made for 'PROJ6' accommodation, ..."

> The question is: why proj instead of proj.4 in libgeotiff?
> The bug [1] cannot be solved using proj.4, why?

proj and proj.4 are different versions of the same software, with proj
being the newer version. See
https://proj.org/faq.html#what-happend-to-proj-4 . I say we completely
deprecate our proj.4 package and replace all occurrences of proj.4 with
proj.

WDYT?

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEf3MDQ/Lwnzx3v3nTLiXui2GAK7MFAl5PyTUACgkQLiXui2GA
K7M6Swf+IRNnns7KYcuE27dTy7B5qwFygUGq0zZQhgbcBHvw5NZGdSWN6cOlJtRb
LNwzsjtnN6ggeiqXnZW64WKMKubqdBPJjcuJpBY2YUIQeO1wJLl8ug+7S5+aS9Qk
CpJ1/iMAe50Ws0/q3j3bg094yRm/gWHVJWmG7DNmHp3NbNjPC2JRd+GzeLd9BPGA
LIlWWW0XHvIZXBBiiLWtHK/Z68o0sDMaCl9Ba4bMrmWJdtdhS7Oz0m1RdMxYt0Y0
+Xc8CFOgHC7HbRonUtnth4OL8dCCmw+8PgQkLaQEPcIXqOOIKHFmOKdHLiVMnSZ9
+twOq4wF4x5wYfSXaT8CvhbWlvsGng==
=lem5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--