> You mean: > > guix build --with-input=proj.4=proj r-rgdal > > then it compiles a lot... and I do not understand why gdal is > recompiled. Anyway! Your command recursively replaces proj.4 with proj. So, some dependency of gdal might have been modified resulting in a rebuild of gdal. > So after some CPU burning, I get: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > Testing examples for package ‘rgdal’ > Running specific tests for package ‘rgdal’ > Running ‘srs_rendering.R’ > comparing ‘srs_rendering.Rout’ to ‘srs_rendering.Rout.save’ ... > 5c5 > < [1] "Rel. 6.2.0, September 1st, 2019, [PJ_VERSION: 620]" > --- >> [1] "Rel. 6.0.0, March 1st, 2019, [PJ_VERSION: 600]" > 7c7 > < [1] "GDAL 3.0.2, released 2019/10/28" > --- >> [1] "GDAL 2.4.0, released 2018/12/14" > 11c11 > < > scot_BNG > --- >> trin_inca_pl03 > 12c12 > < "+proj=tmerc +lat_0=49 +lon_0=-2 +k=0.9996012717 +x_0=400000 > +y_0=-100000 +ellps=airy +units=m +no_defs" > --- >> NA > 13c13 > < > trin_inca_pl03 > --- >> kiritimati_primary_roads > 14c14 > < > NA > --- >> "+proj=utm +zone=4 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs " > 16c16 > < > "+proj=longlat +datum=WGS84 +no_defs" > --- > < > kiritimati_primary_roads > --- >> scot_BNG > 18c18 > < "+proj=utm > +zone=4 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs" > --- >> "+proj=tmerc +lat_0=49 +lon_0=-2 +k=0.9996012717 +x_0=400000 +y_0=-100000 +ellps=airy +towgs84=446.448,-125.157,542.06,0.15,0.247,0.842,-20.489 +units=m +no_defs " > 22c22 > < [1] "+proj=longlat +a=6378137.01 +rf=298.257223563 > +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0 +no_defs" > --- >> [1] "+proj=longlat +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0 +no_defs " > 24c24 > < [1] "+proj=utm +zone=23 +south +ellps=aust_SA > +towgs84=-57,1,-41,0,0,0,0 +units=m +no_defs" > --- >> [1] "+proj=utm +zone=23 +south +ellps=aust_SA +towgs84=-57,1,-41,0,0,0,0 +units=m +no_defs " > 26c26 > < [1] "+proj=longlat +datum=WGS84 +no_defs" > --- >> [1] "+proj=longlat +datum=WGS84 +no_defs " > 28c28 > < [1] "+proj=lcc +lat_1=46.8 +lat_0=46.8 +lon_0=0 > +k_0=0.999877420000019 +x_0=600000 +y_0=2200000.00000032 > +ellps=clrk80ign +pm=paris +towgs84=-168,-60,320,0,0,0,0 +units=m > +no_defs" > --- >> [1] "+proj=lcc +lat_1=46.8 +lat_0=46.8 +lon_0=0 +k_0=0.9998774200000193 +x_0=600000 +y_0=2200000.000000325 +a=6378249.2 +b=6356515.000000472 +towgs84=-168,-60,320,0,0,0,0 +pm=paris +units=m +no_defs " > 40c40 > < file: SP27GTIF.TIF , SRS: +proj=tmerc +lat_0=36.6666666666667 > +lon_0=-88.3333333333333 +k=0.999975 +x_0=152400.30480061 +y_0=0 > +ellps=clrk66 +towgs84=-8,160,176,0,0,0,0 +units=us-ft +no_defs > --- >> file: SP27GTIF.TIF , SRS: +proj=tmerc +lat_0=36.66666666666666 +lon_0=-88.33333333333333 +k=0.9999749999999999 +x_0=152400.3048006096 +y_0=0 +datum=NAD27 +units=us-ft +no_defs > 41c41 > < file: cea.tif , SRS: +proj=cea +lat_ts=33.75 > +lon_0=-117.333333333333 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +datum=NAD27 +units=m +no_defs > --- >> file: cea.tif , SRS: +proj=cea +lon_0=-117.333333333333 +lat_ts=33.75 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +datum=NAD27 +units=m +no_defs > 42c42 > < file: erdas_spnad83.tif , SRS: +proj=tmerc +lat_0=30 > +lon_0=-82.1666666666667 +k=0.9999 +x_0=200000 +y_0=0 +ellps=GRS80 > +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0 +units=us-ft +no_defs > --- >> file: erdas_spnad83.tif , SRS: +proj=tmerc +lat_0=30 +lon_0=-82.16666666666667 +k=0.9999 +x_0=200000 +y_0=0 +ellps=GRS80 +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0 +units=us-ft +no_defs > 43c43 > < file: scaleoffset.vrt , SRS: +proj=utm +zone=18 +ellps=WGS84 > +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0 +units=m +no_defs > --- >> file: scaleoffset.vrt , SRS: +proj=utm +zone=18 +datum=WGS84 +units=m +no_defs > Running ‘test_proj.R’ > comparing ‘test_proj.Rout’ to ‘test_proj.Rout.save’ ... OK > Running ‘tests.R’ > comparing ‘tests.Rout’ to ‘tests.Rout.save’ ... OK > Running ‘tripup.R’ > comparing ‘tripup.Rout’ to ‘tripup.Rout.save’ ... > 266c266 > < coords FALSE > --- >> coords TRUE > 267c267 > < holes FALSE > --- >> holes TRUE > 273c273 > < coords FALSE > --- >> coords TRUE > 274c274 > < holes FALSE > --- >> holes TRUE > Running vignettes for package ‘rgdal’ > Running ‘OGR_shape_encoding.Rnw’ > phase `check' succeeded after 18.7 seconds > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > > Therefore, I do not confirm, I guess. I don't understand. With proj instead of proj.4, it does work, doesn't it? There are no errors and the check phase succeeds.