From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qAZXNqvi/l/caQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:08:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id qLpRMqvi/l8xLgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:08:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 409689402D4 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46294 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzewc-0004XT-7f for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 07:08:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47372) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzewU-0004W9-6j for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 07:08:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51244) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzewT-0001Rn-V1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 07:08:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzewT-00050h-P6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 07:08:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#45836: cups-service-type duplicates lp group Resent-From: Leo Prikler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45836 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 45836-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45836.161053962419184 (code B ref 45836); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:08:01 +0000 Received: (at 45836) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2021 12:07:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34557 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzevY-0004zM-3A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 07:07:04 -0500 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:7287) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzevV-0004yv-46 for 45836@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 07:07:02 -0500 Received: from nijino.local (217-149-169-137.nat.highway.telekom.at [217.149.169.137]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DG5lj4tV7z1LB1x; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:06:57 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4DG5lj4tV7z1LB1x DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1610539617; bh=MINyNJb9FEYgERPWW2WC+W/zhcZckX6+kurtHjadf64=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=n15GFzw5N68AagMKtLK+zIZx1c4MrdtKcIPB2p+Ae5Zz+ebMkedzPDWMMJYfZ0hj4 Edx7V84yFS76G1ia/Hlnz6Lmiwgz/UrW9xWlNi4dAXcQt4mO7+5ZZ8xnO4/x/1DvGc q+k7ldDLpcRjKYxzNwvFqT3ieONYVNKWog1q6H80= Message-ID: From: Leo Prikler Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:06:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <874kjlcbz1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874kjlcbz1.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.117 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45836@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.24 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=tugraz.at header.s=mailrelay header.b=n15GFzw5; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=student.tugraz.at (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 409689402D4 X-Spam-Score: 0.24 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: Fynaen9VHMF3 Hi Ludo, Am Mittwoch, den 13.01.2021, 12:28 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > Hi Leo, > > Leo Prikler skribis: > > > it has come to my attention due to the recent reporting of #45830 > > and > > some conversation in IRC, that cups-service-type adds an lp group, > > which is already defined in %base-groups. Since both share the > > same > > definition, this is not too big an issue, but it prohibits us from > > using a hard error for #45770. > > > > I can currently think of two solutions: Either remove the lp group > > from > > cups-service-type or remove it from base-groups. Neither sounds > > particularly awesome. Perhaps we could also delete identical > > duplicates before asserting that there are none for #45770, but > > that > > sounds like a little much effort. Any ideas how else to solve > > this? > > I’d be pragmatic here: > > 1. Ignore duplicates that are identical (don’t report them). Is that still not a problem, because either definition could change? > 2. Remove “lp” from %base-groups since it has no use without CUPS > (right?). That's probably true, but I fear, that some have already added "lp" to their config.scm. Would that cause issues? We could also add CUPS to %base-services or %desktop-services in some way, but that would probably cause issues with configurations, that already have it. Regards, Leo