From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id GJMTCvCr6mJ9iAAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 19:10:08 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id uCJYCfCr6mIX7wAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 19:10:08 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5D42BD26 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 19:10:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45252 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJHsk-0007MP-Hb for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 13:10:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51680) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJHsg-0007JP-JD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 13:10:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJHsg-0002Wk-9b for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 13:10:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oJHsg-0008HJ-3B for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 13:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#54691: fortune-mod propagates various non-nice things Resent-From: Liliana Marie Prikler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 17:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54691 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 54691@debbugs.gnu.org, Maxime Devos , 56599@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 54691-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54691.165954657031769 (code B ref 54691); Wed, 03 Aug 2022 17:10:02 +0000 Received: (at 54691) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2022 17:09:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49881 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oJHs9-0008GJ-Tw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 13:09:30 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f68.google.com ([209.85.208.68]:43569) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oJHs6-0008Fz-5Q; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 13:09:28 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f68.google.com with SMTP id o22so6827038edc.10; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 10:09:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f6b1pOTyqJa2i2RAFSuriIK+POYGUQItQzXC9sZachM=; b=TpnrhwAosMdCL6tPO1hzYIoGzBzYFFPcO3D/6tjQ6KR381RsjBcdUki3tJKDbCY207 DGVY4sxuboV8dCQncePbCRG7CmSxX6qLd11uEhDiHTPOo5l3cyFnQCZzvSFcQpDDLtKn zecCN1GdxRioNg717/T9wADMZggvNmU9I4Z/0ljEIxFJ8b/Zfc/M7IdKWkPFjR0Fahee Whp8HV5d6b1Bd5JpxRXIjE787JkZQlahmTf1ERh/dpFu9OgaXfaIEuONOJsl+nXjcBMu sMBQ0+I+mWDIzSgtT7Fwdwg79pz+bsptBJ7nUoknZ70zlrU/8zzpSzI0aPioZVHyIeoL de/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f6b1pOTyqJa2i2RAFSuriIK+POYGUQItQzXC9sZachM=; b=gSoMCGQ86gxnT3+dkFVblHKQi4FTdGUgH+itLkJFTZbLK7OLkmdFZJdZGUwJcD8oKi swhwjDSyd8neMiK0QUGyov/J54cOvZ5k4ZXjx0w8vaqPSm1hJwBMgNHburQW1rqP4dxH qh7JkiPYv/B+AjGCOtftdgQHTU1xPe3otx++NjZqY5dDpRd2Es7SrPh03xMhgyMgaBcH zyFe4PJZJ+1ohE6zIQ+0ZCqSCMG1lj3QCTfPTrFEG4x8ShnUdM1gD3qYhxtkITlWgBR0 86XaiWaWUtAnwBRh4bggggo4peUdHHhf0W769/wRcHmeA3CSQzooTfKfokVrXgzWzOUp vvXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+BAFXqytUsVRFfEeVvPBukvMfTw4p6deu5mQHjXByrHrrGEX7h KR1lW2Ku5UWGH5cxxWe+qH8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1v7ITmii+XKa1SwmNXwHqtHcV/BSgPwp6ta3V9VMOhfqGBt5SSNK6zd0juxFPSEtKr4AVDMZw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5289:b0:43b:69a9:38c8 with SMTP id en9-20020a056402528900b0043b69a938c8mr27737310edb.263.1659546559245; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 10:09:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nijino.fritz.box (85-127-52-93.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.52.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ky1-20020a170907778100b00722e52d043dsm7486458ejc.114.2022.08.03.10.09.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Aug 2022 10:09:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Liliana Marie Prikler Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2022 19:09:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y1w5sarm.fsf_-_@gnu.org> References: <3fc3794df2d837c16ce768594c3ea9086b5f0abf.camel@telenet.be> <98c6534fb3bf8c93ace8c7637f69dc80ea00d10c.camel@gmail.com> <87y1w5sarm.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1659546607; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=f6b1pOTyqJa2i2RAFSuriIK+POYGUQItQzXC9sZachM=; b=AZpwUbWF6gnHta7nAjmDQgIEJnpGo0t9d3VhAbwUP95lTmbQq2AgNWl8o9qXFRADCxaCnj aJI5lp8HPk7z+3r2uFNcZNhW+3uT/CvKMEyFLMepUP1icCGTGXP/aym1u6BTVcqjT2P1dS 7AffoW+Xnm45WWSorjKigemqwWaKiG8mb31NXj+s+wqm1LDZzHOQzCVI1HilYXY/LqxoHE cuh4gk/fViDB2NZ5UtNCzP3JACqVtKtpBaGyuj0WNlWxuLRaDOmypCo+t+nMNBKasXq7+a /rudMa1Hqv0QSwVfmfaTFvlip47vqvQkgTu2lauuODyTv+vUBodGyvqhH9SarQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1659546607; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=idPsA97Nlx+2WGCR+ZzF5JcN7M1LoXZxe7mrFAY0w4+naUnWbQ5+M3i3dPoPm5dPyMMxHo IWfZN6jegN/1M102nAbpl0frVOghKI/1O1ZJAw7RTGHJqDyzb5P9VcmxDnQQgUP/P76l3q FFsBf411UdFI0PMW3vnhFmYQSsI82K3M/NlWWdwL/zZPyD+5gyAa0+wIufr3b9CeRIj1Ns ehGlHSEcHPVr94CoMzbKv2PFSaDn4/LNUHobVovA20QdP0ksK0twKzeEQvIAiSrFRbmmkl 1xxGfnvbixkpmGV7sLQsUoGpO2hegm5G+2Q2PmkluCrAjDsrHRYVZsP88baSrw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=TpnrhwAo; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 5.99 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=TpnrhwAo; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D5D42BD26 X-Spam-Score: 5.99 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: jgkq0v8mYHba Hi Ludo, Am Mittwoch, dem 03.08.2022 um 15:43 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > [...] > > -(define-public fortune-mod > > (Perhaps also make “fortune-mod” a deprecated name for > “fortune-jkirchartz”.) I'm getting mixed messages here. On the one hand, Maxime suggests not propagating daikichi from fortune-jkirchartz (which makes it a plain data package lacking a `fortune' command), on the other we want to mark fortune-mod as deprecated. These are mutually exclusive options. > FWIW I’m fine with this change.  Note that there’s also another patch > that removes the ‘off’ database of ‘fortune-mod’¹, though I don’t > know whether that would fully address the issues raised in this > thread.  It will have to closed if/once this series is applied. IIRC, I responded to such a patch already, though perhaps not that thread in particular. To summarize, fortune-mod also propagates non- nice things outside of ‘off’, so removing it is not enough. Cheers