From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:1008:1e59::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id QKoCIuUPoGUcCQAAkFu2QA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:57:25 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6JSuGuUPoGUuhgAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:57:25 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=roose.io header.s=default header.b=fasaLVg5; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1704988645; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=CrryzhAwe3eY5F8QASgO3yik3+ZB9QpflkFynJaX88DsTIAqdUk+LlRVBfveAkDx2RCYyT S3Yt6JTAP4lR/joj5B27dLk/l64gH8JUFhMIaI4OG05BwvfMi1YmeoPVUMuAVWSgqf8VnH nNFa1z8xbKFbh0garyDFmbzuxgi93075cw+lwmDI0ez+m48pwIRdkJwwdm8y1RgPq4t9+o 82UJcLnyIDGb2AG7mFNn1AafyOosu7R9kZ4Oq04ulRdcz2rCgPegaNIv2d5DQNiOG1hb/R eb4Qx84HxgFKYR5X9Ne5GvFo2/+eRJ1I9Va5QtH8pQxuxv3JSgcyw6NJWrU1Jg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=roose.io header.s=default header.b=fasaLVg5; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1704988645; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=cYNuVudVfDBZSlydqVDHx/yrGgMOjjA18jikYducmQo=; b=ekBbrp8CfJpNtu9gkWRk39je8tEO/xKnYcltMKI+3nBuleQgHSgE0KlaCZacqeNw/+NoYZ fWKOoVe01y7h0PV3UQCtKW9WZL7iF2PJLyQOpMPXzSvWaKVtl0z00UbNI7wL9jWgL+QP/2 UNEx2NMOaqC4KNtOBQx4ynFPz6isALSiiUvEm8qtKTyEYpheF0Ex6j7VhGflFK0t8sRPIQ lRZ8mV9i2p66Lo+wRur5/JRFcJYgim2b1LLYv7SiIEL5adzp7suY+awQ4Gh1qnyJhtL30i V8DHxP9wa/fkk9vjTiLc6y+/FwmWsUQYmSkUUCQvYIV3kMX6EII3/7rRbFC4ug== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A7B639C01 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:57:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNxQY-0003UV-JL; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:57:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNxQW-0003Ty-VF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:57:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNxQW-0005RK-MS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:57:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNxQT-00034V-Nf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:57:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#68243: alacritty segmentation fault Resent-From: Steven Roose Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68243 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Efraim Flashner , 68243@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 68243-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68243.170498856411708 (code B ref 68243); Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:57:01 +0000 Received: (at 68243) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2024 15:56:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33671 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNxPY-00032k-0g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:56:04 -0500 Received: from hosted.mailcow.de ([2a00:f820:417::202]:35831) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNxPV-000329-8g for 68243@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:56:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=roose.io; s=default; t=1704988559; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=cYNuVudVfDBZSlydqVDHx/yrGgMOjjA18jikYducmQo=; b=fasaLVg5eRnE4oIa5AfnueDl9g5L9eQZZh8VL1/pJpBvPdxTejhCx9rtPA+a8sdOIaQF0k CN362hMl9+WSKBXT+ACB20z/+nvGHXp5kU96g9a2AgOUmrtrmMj6KSA/OrhDQ1JXjt46JW VhTXw10fR9KHYyrjyho/xV4/TekvnLUkUVbyKmmGrCeYjApEB2YC4XEJJMZuh/v/aJy0Cb Vlg/8qxBOIo/xL4Z/B7PU1MibpLR7DtMXsAtiLVOx4TEAuRA3YQAMjU2Ns/vI8/weKwMdr OR4SF/X23eBq5AhuxfLzodCAHHZ7ezsxAGvQ1gShglyrJj8uNkQHaIkCyoOxqw== Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 8C9245C724B; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:55:57 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:55:56 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <13ec7660-d10f-8864-f041-ad5a6398eb96@roose.io> Content-Language: en-US From: Steven Roose In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.39 X-Spam-Score: -2.39 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4A7B639C01 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-TUID: kOp07iECvnDQ This is what guix system describe shows: > commit: aabfddbe8bc16fa82067e88e7d79c8c1bc802414 So that should be the one that works, I guess. The newer one doesn't. On 1/7/24 09:06, Efraim Flashner wrote: > I meant more of what's the guix version from the generation which > contains the non-working alacritty. > > On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 02:51:34PM +0000, steven@roose.io wrote: >> How can I check generations for packages? `guix package -l` doesn't seem to show any useful information. >> >> I can't seem to find out what the syntax should be for the PATTERN arguments in guix package, like `guix package --list-generations=PATTERN`. >> >> I try `guix package -l alacritty`, `guix package --list-generations=alacritty` but always get `invalid syntax: alacritty`.. >> >> On 1/5/24 12:52 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 03:32:55PM +0000, Steven Roose wrote: >>>> I've been using alacritty as my default terminal for about a year without >>>> much issues. I'm currently on v0.12.3 of alacritty and use it with i3 and >>>> Xorg. A month or two ago I noticed that upgrading GuixSD broke alacritty. >>>> Since it's my main terminal and I didn't have any other terminals installed, >>>> I was forced to rollback my system through GRUB because I couldn't literally >>>> not even open a terminal to investigate or roll-back by CLI. I was trying >>>> another system upgrade now and noticed the issue is still not fixed. When >>>> running alacritty from an already-open alacritty only shows me "segmentation >>>> fault". The working and broken version is both 0.12.3, so I think it might >>>> not be an alacritty issue but more a linking/build issue. I'm basically >>>> stuck on a months-old Guix until this is fixed. >>>> >>>> If there is any way I can be of use by providing debug/log files of some >>>> kind, please let me know. >>> Looking at 'alacritty --help' it looks like you can try adding -v (up to >>> 3) to get a more verbose output so hopefully we get more of an error >>> message. >>> >>> Which generation are you on that is working for you? Which one do you >>> know is segfaulting? I'd like to try to narrow it down. >>> >>>