bug#58813: [PATCH] doc: Document how to use Patman for patches submission.

[Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>]

Am Freitag, dem 03.03.2023 um 10:54 +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Hi,
> 
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
> 
> > Fixes <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/58813>.
> 
> It’s only tangentially related, no?
> 
> > * doc/contributing.texi (Sending a Patch Series): Mention Patman. 
> > Adjust the examples to no longer showcase broken command
> > substitutions.  Add a section about how to use Patman, with
> > examples.
> 
> I’m not convinced we’d want to advocate for yet another tool.  I feel
> like this would make patch submission guidelines even more complex,
> or at least look more complex.
I do think it'd be fine to have more options (in a "use what you find
convenient" way), but as-is this patch replaces one imperfect tool with
one where:

> [H]ow many of the ~40 committers would be able to provide guidance
> with patman?  
I'm not one of them :(

> That shouldn’t be the only criterion, but it certainly is an
> important one.
I think an important criterion should be what aspiring committers can
expect when they follow the advice as written.  Compare and contrast
'guix style', where committers often have to point out its flaws.

Cheers