From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0EYQBq4Tn2FzSgEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 05:40:14 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id UFTIAa4Tn2HSaAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 04:40:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9A59318E6 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 05:40:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47914 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mq6YN-0002gc-W7 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:40:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56558) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mq6YF-0002gT-HD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:40:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mq6YF-00030X-8u for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:40:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mq6YF-0006Oz-0C for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:40:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52090: swaylock unaligned fastbin chunk detected Resent-From: Jack Hill Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 04:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 52090 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 52090@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.163781519124586 (code B ref -1); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 04:40:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2021 04:39:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55477 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mq6Y2-0006OT-SU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:39:51 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49572) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mq6Y0-0006OM-S2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:39:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mq6Y0-0002g8-Jk for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:39:48 -0500 Received: from minsky.hcoop.net ([104.248.1.95]:49836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mq6Xu-0002wS-0J for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:39:43 -0500 Received: from marsh.hcoop.net ([45.55.52.66]) by minsky.hcoop.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mq6Xs-0007Do-LV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:39:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:39:40 -0500 (EST) From: Jack Hill X-X-Sender: jackhill@marsh.hcoop.net Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Received-SPF: pass client-ip=104.248.1.95; envelope-from=jackhill@jackhill.us; helo=minsky.hcoop.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1637815213; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe: list-post; bh=AvImw+RUkRpoyFE3r71DAWzqY8v75PRO3cFmtBeFVVY=; b=EZnjSjJuKhwAFzVgAa4q+nzKUNgGWL0uhZOKUA4iK0ptu/B7PddDmmTiAa5kLYsdYe2b1O wlg+WDnfmgL+9A8lrDuwwnmtoozLXqJZhW2+Up9CeGePIybZGDBy5Hdd1wEHKHDClUuNwX FkVmPU9I2BeSrSd/vagreKUpuSYWzFiln6RWIPJRMRsVczbuy1kvqI1sj3DTzy85LTxxPE vt6hZ4+fIg8leLtS/XuLmoQAUOVVC/zZJPaq2WcnQxnRC1nyKyFew78LGPTcKdfgGdI525 xqHAhbmmuXATGOMk87mw/jx3pFE/fwYgqIHvAZ42KIR1mySHtUno/QssPy0aqA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1637815213; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Tqre2MlkxDax9gRHKfRElLuEba4lYtC63/kq8smv6N60HbP7pUjyAlQyG6j3Z1huMRDeFR tfiL6ticypAiEh4oyXJ/wf5PMhzJE+O1sakQPXBkN9A8ibZrjEx4bMK7/Uqa/ykjvFDqu9 Nc7c5NBFUg7zSsHobb7IYksKwGqVgIvzhgst4czm4uTJ/Z+ypgM40x12AHEJsUq/WV613i QA5m+8U9R6IaiX1Jt34YmJ7Ty8dnc1cG+Yn1Y+l52HTOkJOLPCiIab9/ChWBf5Qu95Nypl /nrQJs0g76VRYsPupm1CqQYt3UVCBDfe9UU+GO+XByaMahAQA9muKuflqfTreg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.09 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B9A59318E6 X-Spam-Score: -3.09 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: wL/YmRyjf3PG Hi Guix, swaylock sometimes crashes on core-updates-frozen d0f6e8ae7944666469ec1a226df502063d4d0670 with: $ swaylock -e -c 195521 -F malloc_consolidate(): unaligned fastbin chunk detected Aborted I think that this could be upstream issue #162 [0] since I see malloc_consolidate() in that stacktrace, and the host where I'm seeing this problem has some monitors that take a while to wake up from sleep. [0] https://github.com/swaywm/swaylock/issues/162 Best, Jack