From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id yEQ2NRhye2B/lQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:41:12 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id AMw1MBhye2CIYAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 23:41:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BBA51B3B0 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 01:41:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41950 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXuYo-0005D4-75 for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 19:41:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXuYg-0005Cm-Dp for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 19:41:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33377) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXuYg-0002hX-6P for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 19:41:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXuYg-0002hX-4D for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 19:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47115: bug#47853: guix system reconfigure build of `/gnu/store/inppfcz5yk5a20cwhv1dwqn8zq6jcdxl-grub.cfg.drv' failed Resent-From: Jack Hill Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 23:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47115 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" Received: via spool by 47115-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47115.161870280310297 (code B ref 47115); Sat, 17 Apr 2021 23:41:02 +0000 Received: (at 47115) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2021 23:40:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44923 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXuXj-0002fv-0P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 19:40:03 -0400 Received: from minsky.hcoop.net ([104.248.1.95]:60926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXuXh-0002fI-6R; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 19:40:01 -0400 Received: from marsh.hcoop.net ([45.55.52.66]) by minsky.hcoop.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lXuXb-0002mV-BZ; Sat, 17 Apr 2021 19:39:55 -0400 Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 19:39:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Jack Hill X-X-Sender: jackhill@marsh.hcoop.net In-Reply-To: <87v98k341u.fsf@web.de> Message-ID: References: <87v98k341u.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="925712948-948443701-1618702795=:8414" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 47115@debbugs.gnu.org, 47853@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1618702872; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=05tQXxLU5CjV3LL+NkqTY6YxNNH9eZ3Zy8SRcpjUqQ8=; b=CDTrh0aDFpYOCtHACJxtEMoScCRFy5Jj//o1ZCBF4je4iUHQ9XX6dbYuBG6+sFjWujjcj5 WqVLlHbd77RTZTcl28XyCiDQgcnXbvW4GaJ0gaa2oa9TBWw/WkjlNpFMjGYTXkylVniXDR PNjZCOCy2TTjsTAxb0UicXHYiCOK0Bpo/84sjDNx8NASF8Cc/AJwna1dCzxQeKWBRcK2ii qxiCgjHm8lEgO/Pax/odlh9kX34/ewg9YBcPIPZjIASghXUVZrWJJczqQeh49jnRXYigsq FnnCeM8ic6v7DE8IoCj+oem+pyRsG5Yx9RhplVDvl4knCCuh61UhY4F+SEIR9A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1618702872; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=BEvjVntKukpa9mfQDcYqaFSL8lufMlAnQ8oH7yWP60jyxbDja7TGGykdV/gG67dVmf2fIC j2PdtIx+d3Y6okfcBbFQyToA/oGDOQDurB/ZUmBAbhl/F9T4+KD/73j7kjeweJdtIE3Rwj BcI4BtoA+AKttg/OpRPXB9UxBKheTQ7OdPvRVyDRFPv2ZtZ9b2OXZ1wHGh3qDAI0IOjWLW Ormmkk0uQErfnSM8X7K655BDGkpX/zRlLMBYQEIUmkif2OwDvPpxu6OZQkMxkgTxP+d/s/ +jNngdufggYWiW50I9s9qO05ylRW5yTEZSngTKRXPLByJ6f4RIqhlzNM8kU4yg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.44 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8BBA51B3B0 X-Spam-Score: -1.44 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: hKgN/CPVaEd8 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --925712948-948443701-1618702795=:8414 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sun, 18 Apr 2021, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > On my system building grub fails because grub-image.png fails. […] > Backtrace: > 2 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/larqpc2wjhnc6jmj4885k8lynd1?") > In gnu/build/svg.scm: > 53:6 1 (svg->png _ "/gnu/store/0f2bpqpgflza414sk0hwms3rdizg1x?" ?) > In unknown file: > 0 (rsvg-handle-render-cairo # #) > > ERROR: In procedure rsvg-handle-render-cairo: > Wrong type (expecting finalized smob): # Oh dear. I ran into a similar problem (at least that resulted in the same Guile error message in #47115) to do with grafts and a store that was not using the hard links for de-duplication. Essentially the de-duplication masked an issue with differing files being included in the closure. Can you provide more information about your system? I'm particularly interested in whether you're using store de-duplication, but other specifics about your system might be interesting. Do you know when you last successfully reconfigured? Best, Jack --925712948-948443701-1618702795=:8414--