From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id KFO8CUvAzV5yEAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 01:20:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 11FyBUvAzV5JbwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 01:20:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9053F9402A0 for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 01:20:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56636 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdkjo-0003l2-21 for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 21:20:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42414) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdkji-0003kt-AQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 21:20:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdkji-0003MN-0b for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 21:20:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdkjh-0002yd-SR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 21:20:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#41174: [PATCH] gnu: webkitgtk: Add patch to share all fonts. Resent-From: Jack Hill Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 01:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41174 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Prikler Received: via spool by 41174-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41174.159054234811380 (code B ref 41174); Wed, 27 May 2020 01:20:01 +0000 Received: (at 41174) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2020 01:19:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47509 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdkip-0002xT-VT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 21:19:08 -0400 Received: from minsky.hcoop.net ([104.248.1.95]:41878) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdkio-0002wx-26 for 41174@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 21:19:06 -0400 Received: from marsh.hcoop.net ([45.55.52.66]) by minsky.hcoop.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jdkih-00016T-Tn; Tue, 26 May 2020 21:18:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 21:18:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Jack Hill X-X-Sender: jackhill@marsh.hcoop.net In-Reply-To: <1b9e299efed71d54ee14fbe904647553864bdc73.camel@student.tugraz.at> Message-ID: References: <20200526181345.32726-1-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> <1b9e299efed71d54ee14fbe904647553864bdc73.camel@student.tugraz.at> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 41174@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: LwDf/0AJ+OS8 On Tue, 26 May 2020, Leo Prikler wrote: > Hi, > > I don't see anything in the patch itself, that is specific to Guix, so > it should probably work upstream as well. This issue is likely going > to affect other functional package managers like Nix too, so it would > be nice, if we can get the patch to be accepted upstream. However, it > does add a specific exception just for fonts, while other resources are > still taken from XDG_DATA_HOME. As such, it is still rather an ad-hoc > solution to a very specific annoyance than something "general". Ah, I see. I missed the special exception for fonts. > I'm also not quite sure, whether this could cause problems with the > number of arguments being passed to the bwrap process exceeding some > limit. It has not yet come up so far, but I thought I'd mention it. > However, if it does, we're going to be the first to notice with our > huge environment variables, so that's probably a bigger deal here than > elsewhere. I don't think this should be a problem. bwrap supports having its arguments passed over a file describer (with the --args option), and this is what WebKitGTK does. Best, Jack