From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id CAZfFT9/x1/WcQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 11:49:19 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id kM8vET9/x18yDgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 11:49:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B233994043A for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:49:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52488 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkQdJ-0000kH-I7 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 06:49:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkQd6-0000ii-Cy for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 06:49:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51253) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkQd3-0002Bt-Jp for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 06:49:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkQd3-0005CC-IV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 06:49:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44452: Clash between guile-3.0 and guile-3.0-latest Resent-From: divoplade Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 11:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44452 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: zimoun Received: via spool by 44452-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44452.160690973019952 (code B ref 44452); Wed, 02 Dec 2020 11:49:01 +0000 Received: (at 44452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2020 11:48:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34566 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkQcs-0005Bk-GG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 06:48:50 -0500 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:52715) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkQcp-0005BL-Sd for 44452@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 06:48:50 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 86.254.138.104 Received: from divoplade.home (lfbn-poi-1-813-104.w86-254.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.254.138.104]) (Authenticated sender: d@divoplade.fr) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3019240006; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: From: divoplade Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:48:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86v9dk1mzz.fsf@gmail.com> References: <875z6i23zm.fsf@gnu.org> <34ed5d6ac3158347eea2a6ca5a8be5675c4abeb2.camel@divoplade.fr> <86pn3ttd9m.fsf@gmail.com> <86mtyxtbig.fsf@gmail.com> <2b467f85aaed6c1a2178278678da648e2170d6a1.camel@divoplade.fr> <86v9dk1mzz.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 44452@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.28 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B233994043A X-Spam-Score: -2.28 X-Migadu-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu X-TUID: Xa4OEjxUyKku Le mercredi 02 décembre 2020 à 12:11 +0100, zimoun a écrit : > Said explicitly, if you do not want in your profile the package X > belonging to %base-packages , do not add the %base-packages list. :-) > Or > create your custom list (remove the ones you do not want). I do not > see > what could done on this side. The list %base-packages is 40 packages > considered as “kind of minimal” to be able to do minimal stuff. I would disagree on that, it contains guile 3.0.4 instead of 3.0.2. 3.0.4 is not used, and prevents the other guile packages that require 3.0.2. If it contained 3.0.2 instead, I would 100% agree with what you said there. But it is fixed in core-updates, so we just need to wait for core- updates to be merged.