From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id ILtaKcP6t2AxwwAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 23:40:19 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id qPhxJMP6t2CmGAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 21:40:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E224F62B for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 23:40:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53500 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1loYb2-0007xk-Tq for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:40:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60232) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1loYao-0007xR-Bz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:40:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58180) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1loYao-0004sC-32 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:40:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1loYao-0001Tm-00 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#48793: Make guix room available over matrix Resent-From: bo0od Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 21:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48793 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org, 48793@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16226699795642 (code B ref -1); Wed, 02 Jun 2021 21:40:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2021 21:39:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41490 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1loYaR-0001Sv-6z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:39:39 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:41002) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1loYaQ-0001Sm-3y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:39:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1loYaP-0007we-Rn for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:39:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:33632) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1loYaN-0004cA-Ka for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:39:37 -0400 Received: from fews1.riseup.net (fews1-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FwMqn6NGRzDq8t; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:39:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1622669973; bh=wu3WJImoEOqFx1uwZYYYAk6UnTiCof70VEipEdeXObU=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Z16bIQUCbZPfNo8W9MBB0QppyMM89TtMkvb/wRtyZYk2yiVBv45dzadujfPz64dCK c2zUixD9BO7tf5P0+U1lx3wZytYWWeW31M0gQ5N6GhOVEXEK5KnAM+Y1lDRCOn00Rh atR43rwS15qLVEScRGzUJt3WNiHo/tSAFNtbJu0s= X-Riseup-User-ID: FAA2F65EB52CE4085653ADB4886B3339D4882FECC4E5A30804C405C1E97ADEE4 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FwMql6vL1z5vfB; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:39:30 -0700 (PDT) References: <97fdc236-5dd2-00e8-9b30-3100ce7ff3dd@riseup.net> <87tumgm2h3.fsf@nckx> From: bo0od Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 21:39:26 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87tumgm2h3.fsf@nckx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.252.153.129; envelope-from=bo0od@riseup.net; helo=mx1.riseup.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 48793@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1622670018; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Y7LUKBNaw8nbFqORt2OTb16Qoq1OB9kPT2V3vPD9bj8=; b=JTuyoLF1quAeqnaCbFWCQSbBpZMBVZV+z+64GD9CEiGyUfBKdQrrnT0TVbrvQhrvEHFEyG yZ8ppEFt0/1l9N2M7foEsI0jB43y7f+46J5yQvaaxXs4NYkrrE2Q8o1FFbI+kf329gc91f Vn/JlVGkIWBuPHM3nF+2TEXKo+bBG/kQSmORmrSjPS8Ok7n+RtfUSMqxRJEJNUNzz5Yr/E cVcP1m0tmlTylbQrsJyhOMIRO9jQDcbwQbcPWxFox9M7oFyyw3lOLJC97QNgCD1Yl8O6fi xhtHfIi2ibA6F8Lc61xraq+2B5EykbD4wNWPcyVia2MYO0TI5bnshtE0Q7MTyQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1622670018; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=tzJ1huMzaJOOTaCYeFQlQcPosf6eWXfP23BGq+mJIiEDX+bddTMh8ossySlLgM4VXhi7xg /iJEAv94Y9YIoXpHOu41zQkKjHRFmV8T60KIX/V9Tec2ChFhW1nGPzCwtZEZjZLoqLlmrH t+0/aFswqQTJ12g5DJhUAEKmX9coAUrmH5/Eeg8Fj+F/ViPQ/7qRZpdG4JSn22OhPEUOvr YKDEDbi1w3O2AcKmErPkIHjHGXoFqEGK6o6bGWeIVRMaPBnby/XbvYMXj4x7/x2Ho+eHnX nFg6Q4TJHwMFYlcFuRsXY5lVsd16t7BCAvmXHj5+SPzF3EJi5I5Pn7hcG71gvw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=Z16bIQUC; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.33 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=Z16bIQUC; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8E224F62B X-Spam-Score: -1.33 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: qlFm36EUx92D > The #guix channel is already bridged over Matrix. Is there a bug in the > bridge? It's better to report that directly to Libera. Im not sure im following, Does guix has its own room over matrix or not? if yes what is it if not thats why i opened this ticket. > Otherwise, this sounds like it belongs in the existing thread on > guix-devel@ where everyone can suggest and discuss their favourite > protocol, not on the Guix bug tracker. ah i see, didnt know that i should close this and report there or continue here ? Tobias Geerinckx-Rice: > Hi bo0od, > > The #guix channel is already bridged over Matrix.  Is there a bug in the > bridge?  It's better to report that directly to Libera. > > Otherwise, this sounds like it belongs in the existing thread on > guix-devel@ where everyone can suggest and discuss their favourite > protocol, not on the Guix bug tracker. > > Kind regards, > > T G-R