From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id yNL7LFTsq2ZoHwEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2024 20:13:08 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id yNL7LFTsq2ZoHwEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2024 22:13:08 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=GZGnidPY; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=xBdzwJjX; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b="p juBJnw"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1722543188; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=aTbxglKZ2Umsvy/CFTvsHcP9YzMzwFOTy0tIZWuFWI8=; b=of3bD+7mIdbvheZgYvAi+kzLM3NSXx9GADnfJEW2b3n0h3QZeB5HC1XvZkL53w+qTPx7n0 WIAV6oJzL4QubTMwu2PBG15Qlx9cmV0HvnMjR4hk9RCFfTEuHQLaDJju96ofBezPRdM7P0 dOYT3mvb8xh6i8pYKY1QnjhkWFs6c1rA5M7adfgNt6TKBAJpO6ZNOAdNoKp41Or8hjwGsg kq+FWoZ2POqxS8OF9KxxA4UmCpbKNM+4WOpe2HPOv63a1MJGldyF7Vec82b8jpkEDKnsxU z5mNSNar9Q1p4SMTsDyDlIJTCzaZF1WUrIxYCwpBFkWskEDESdJ49s6h5H3JYA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=GZGnidPY; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=xBdzwJjX; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b="p juBJnw"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1722543188; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=k9hbTEOtm7DO45HcWZa6g7E15Pd4qAwJ8iUeFAjfVOw7wGDQlBELOxIdFBgXvhV3IgDoXf P3hkXLp0S9ocMJP0DOgxEw9K5dtYdKURK6brVmNy6DYv54Dlf802wXNT+6Tfd/oIybiTc2 4BOblfdjW1/Xl1RtdOH/YQf6D5/LPP0J/HRVjQ9+4Yh2s0WQHo4veVgd3/Vo3HJnhXT3kX 8H9yNfKmjwpmk41JhRmhaj2hUm8aH52sy0ruRHgNUe0Z5KmoI5BCzZ2i2ggwQ/K89se6pV yRq++EsmpekTDcUMeGzf/IZJpYW0mEzdJ3t6cXuR/wy7mPlvwvhAfke75ctgyw== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 046D16EA21 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 22:13:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sZcAK-0005Aq-2K; Thu, 01 Aug 2024 16:12:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sZcAI-0005Ad-G7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2024 16:12:46 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sZcAI-00034J-6I for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2024 16:12:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:From:Date:To:Subject; bh=aTbxglKZ2Umsvy/CFTvsHcP9YzMzwFOTy0tIZWuFWI8=; b=GZGnidPY4M98yFjHA7uE6XUJPx2vVNh+ePOmZSyVVc04em711hylwa5Q2Z2xwZNwv9i82G+cXmfdgJmFzeBxMYuDORNoJwPKdKCsA1ZVJvL+TuVWwawKGGMo+r7l26//zXUupZ4YuXHF7sXvFSGgF8D+w1ne5WWHgEEYHJEZhAZslnx1Zi7zWZZY6Kb0AB5816UIiPubj7YSHBXhlqalIM+synrTLtXmS7O8Q5AArC7/OzpsTt5it8H5w5tLNGMHwTg+Uje8URns9yjbtubyQQlm507i1ADA2cy29yvasev/XF/QyyQLolHx9o0IXmzOT4hH2uq2ICZ3dyBtJtpHhg==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sZcAY-00071n-EI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2024 16:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#67535: Does anyone use i686-linux? [was Re: bug#67535: ci.guix.gnu.org 'Cannot allocate memory' while building for i686-linux] Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 20:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67535 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Andr=C3=A9?= Batista Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , guix-devel@gnu.org, 67535@debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner Received: via spool by 67535-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67535.172254317326993 (code B ref 67535); Thu, 01 Aug 2024 20:13:02 +0000 Received: (at 67535) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2024 20:12:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51989 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sZcAO-00071I-Py for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2024 16:12:53 -0400 Received: from fout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.146]:47581) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sZcAM-000710-H7 for 67535@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2024 16:12:51 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFD8138AB72; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 16:12:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 01 Aug 2024 16:12:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s= mesmtp; t=1722543147; x=1722629547; bh=aTbxglKZ2Umsvy/CFTvsHcP9Y zMzwFOTy0tIZWuFWI8=; b=xBdzwJjX5bK6Rndo9ScqICSaRCAy804TqgqPwtk74 AZkU4ZAa1B2s6LNfUVKYTsOxWr11RHMNqYtDSJFiAHePA8RSbObs73EcIs2HIsG8 /P4FlcdfQZ8Tq1Qny2599KRM6EaYHk26Kt+c2rHKNnmP94NWFWHfOdG/lEC8dUlY b4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1722543147; x= 1722629547; bh=aTbxglKZ2Umsvy/CFTvsHcP9YzMzwFOTy0tIZWuFWI8=; b=p juBJnwPrfWIn94IXNbKqnz6WqoXiiWwJTzZCrudFDh7UNYDsp95x5VdEF0ds1NVS 6afoLp3Bxh2Z8ci27P8nvxUxKQzZNKkyhVNBECbVAoNpREjcoKCeDDlayq/5c79d lYNzLRYVolrql0Tk/Quf1jR652zj+OXnAxclBLvqtyd6yxEeKDSwGfZml2Flufhc Zo+868VfJ8bPpLMvq5gSf7g8RxPyri49JmnqRCCWd1xgUH7OI/D0kePVc/l5aOxn 62Z7FqQ+8yxPM9FrUxHXbHS2PZ9EJT+f65wSrMof//2Ut5CNs4tNEYefJbQs/edx gb0xyRl4Ayoim40iYmqnQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrjeekgddugeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtkeertddttddunecuhfhrohhmpefnvgho ucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeekgfeivdelffehhedtgfeufffhfeejhfduleetffetfeettedutefghfek hfegvdenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvpdhn sggprhgtphhtthhopedt X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 16:12:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 16:12:18 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <87sevsxtqg.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Spam-Score: -10.57 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 046D16EA21 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -10.57 X-TUID: beVqhBhwwDPI On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 06:02:23PM -0300, André Batista wrote: > seg 29 jul 2024 às 14:33:59 (1722274439), rekado@elephly.net enviou: > > FWIW, I'm using one of those Atom chips in a netbook for an installation > > of Sugar Desktop. I upgrade it every few months or so. If I'm the only > > user of i686-linux I would not want to condemn the project to supporting > > the architecture for my sake. > > For the record, I'm another one still using those atom netbooks. Most > software that I use on that machine still builds and runs fine, with the > occasional hiccup. > > But even though I use the arch, I also don't feel particularly inclined > to fix the occasional errors and can understand if people here decide to > drop support to it. Thanks for chiming in Ricardo and André. Do you build your own kernels for these machines? Or wait for the occasional successful build from CI? Download substitutes from a different build farm?