From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms1.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4GNMH0H6F2aHTwEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:57:05 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4GNMH0H6F2aHTwEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:57:05 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="T eMxfOT"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=Bc6xryu+; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1712847425; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=JpXR8LzVDfLU61Nb7o1shNE7kPkK5gT35KdR2byCKt2oN2dWeje0zJuk+qBK8SWqnppB1K 1/lZTFQeWUCWAgbJhksN/If2n9SVgYOXjpD4OY3MPm/fxDQOlCzN6kKGl5XrBrxL7BzGmG Ap14wpPLi34qdvr0ky3FmL5FYpd3VlWqI4/wFbx6ZTzAdtGNJQWlH0DflMcPRaH+LR6vye lyVXAzfyuJcjRH/PldpAARSWywBRMufOR2n/TWrtm8wRP+J7iVwRvIPfXJqsA0xoQewkiw HEe/prZtfPnXWGAEvLakPWeNyyT2V5sKmk6r6No5LEMjBHohDEkuXSN7ZgTuTA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="T eMxfOT"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=Bc6xryu+; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1712847425; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=s7fHLrdYxzsMLi9ZkhvvNd7wxFDwMNB8DyxF5cNWUJw=; b=hOJ7nZxRCIw7Hp+1NYZ6G+6udbJiRr4N/uEGojcFXkebp6NNhGSOuq//blYpg7V7IvdNLf J+0KvGn/mBMsy/Kw+wF7arhk8MRV9z08hZj9f9x08m9+8+npVew8HgPPxyQsKBwLAkE6se Y31Sntm7cv5vjtm6H+wyceUqqzi+zVcyN2geYoD5x3zuxwBwILIGGHVK2+3p+LVTniHOcZ tqsw2eECPPpXNLWLjq4cb+r41gZvi1FAIWRylUg2z5Q6QEDkQ1qvzvzn7OywQctJmSK0Jg Y9vHPjgtMTaOgziocpCnUIiMiu9rrcnYU7WD/d9GHfdzBwenTVB1uYj+vrfwNg== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AED1E6A756 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:57:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ruvrD-0001Q9-7s; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:56:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ruvrB-0001Pe-Ew for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:56:53 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ruvrB-0006Qk-60 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:56:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ruvrK-0000BO-Dt for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#70324: After upgrade of linux-libre, linux-libre-documentation fails to build Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70324 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> Cc: 70324@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 70324-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B70324.171284736232607 (code B ref 70324); Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:57:02 +0000 Received: (at 70324) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2024 14:56:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57127 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ruvqL-0008Tk-Bu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:56:02 -0400 Received: from fout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([103.168.172.144]:52971) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ruvqH-0008RL-43 for 70324@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:55:59 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FCC138015B; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:55:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:55:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1712847342; x= 1712933742; bh=s7fHLrdYxzsMLi9ZkhvvNd7wxFDwMNB8DyxF5cNWUJw=; b=T eMxfOT30Vkf8j2AZQPfvdLISV6LFG4oOf93Rti77R+i3BTLHfeX/Eq9ZkV0TwkWa rgGGGT0NLtH/LCzrM9wEoqAFg5Qs/580GC1jYh2hNcdgoZlTs8Nd8UnfjSC0/Y/T KinRr7lCEN/8od0HAtA4vxFJE2/wrXf9WFa323qFGk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1712847342; x=1712933742; bh=s7fHLrdYxzsMLi9ZkhvvNd7wxFDw MNB8DyxF5cNWUJw=; b=Bc6xryu+MkswhgQfvRM7PAn+tRipyFVOH+8/1BdIMn7/ ur4Dk5t82ItoBG+CKdneN6HZTB2OHlGZweIsraU9wkngA1O4ZP7SnyhujOUaCaHr Asuwc8xM3tShvOgLXkpKUsYqkf3GpPpqWJ6NM5CCa4lBYVrronPy6I77mNtmwzor UpCIf0YKf2BA6hp85zYCKheZnmJ+Nk7FdPZuBIv3BZBHuisvTQo0boqIccf9MUxf UlQl3/l1SUqEr6MonURqvTYX1bto0BGUa9Uid4x9CILEPNzYMxtnWLT9FsY+KxGa JvisN/GtPRXqPwSPWR9aUP6t+07ZoUtrgl8aTvYmBw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudehkedgkeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehttd ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeetheeuvdeivdelueeukefhtdeihe dtgefhvddvlefhudejudeiheelfeevteeuhfenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghose hfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:55:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:55:39 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Spam-Score: -5.47 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: AED1E6A756 X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.47 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: EtNldTyYpxAd On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 04:42:27PM +0200, Tomas Volf wrote: > I would assume it is the texinfodocs triggering the YNL_INDEX for us. This > snippet from the commit message: > > If one of other targets such as latexdocs or epubdocs is built > without building htmldocs, missing .rst files can cause additional > WARNINGs from sphinx-build as follow: > > Seems to indicate it is intentional. Okay, thanks for looking. We can add a dependency on python-pyyaml and it should work. > Right, I should have written the question differently. I am curious how this > got onto the master. Given the point 9. in (guix)Submitting Patches, and the > fact the QA should run on every patch before it is accepted, I was surprised > that the broken build of dependent package was committed. > > Since this was second time in past ~two months the linux-libre-documentation > package on master was broken, I was curious if it is special in some way. Oh, I see. As shown on the 'kernel-updates' Cuirass jobset page, our infrastructure at ci.guix.gnu.org can build less than of the kernel packages successfully. So, the documentation failures are "lost in the noise". https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/kernel-updates I'm looking for more people to help with the kernel packages, and one person has joined the effort and that is great! But if we want to hold the kernel packages to the normal Guix standard, we need more help: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-10/msg00079.html Based on lack of complaints, it seems that people are only using Guix's linux-libre kernels on x86_64. Either nobody is using the other architectures, or they are using different kernels. So bugs are seldom reported or fixed. Example of CI failure bugs that don't seem to affect anyone: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/67535 And qa.quix.gnu.org is too slow for kernel updates, which occur roughly once a week. If QA takes more than one week to process the proposed updates, then we would never catch up. The QA workflow is very good and we should be using it, but it needs to be more powerful.