From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
Cc: John Kehayias <john.kehayias@protonmail.com>, 67608-done@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#67608: qtbase fails to build on i686
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 14:21:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXBnRPFS61aC1Ppe@3900XT> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871qc2yht9.fsf@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1995 bytes --]
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 06:42:10PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> John Kehayias <john.kehayias@protonmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hi Maxim,
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 01:32 PM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> After recent mesa/xorg upgrades, qtbase fails to build on i686, per
> >> <https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2700964/details>.
> >
> > I saw this when I was working on the mesa-updates branch, but I didn't
> > think it was a new failure. I looked back just now and even going to
> > July or further back I don't see any successful builds of qtbase-6.*
> > on i686-linux. The most recent version has the same failures as this
> > log, pre-mesa-updates. Looked like a previous version of qtbase-6 had
> > a different failure though.
>
> Indeed. I wonder why Cuirass flagged the failure as a new one.
Maybe it was mixing up qtbase@5 and qtbase@6 for determining if it had
successfully built before?
> [...]
>
> > As for the actual cause, I don't have a clue. There was a failure
> > cause by an update on that branch, which I had fixed in
> > aee3c5a894fddf88810f18fa8880b423b078b3fa (from libxkbcommon update).
> >
> > Was there a version of qtbase-6 that builds on i686?
>
> OK. I don't seem to find one looking at CI. We should probably report
> this upstream if it hasn't already been.
I found it broken when I was going through a big rebuild and I believe
it tracked it down to the -DFEATURE_xxx=OFF flags that we've been
carrying since qt-4. Once I removed them i686 stopped trying to use
128-bit numbers and compiled successfully. As a comparison, Debian
doesn't use those flags.
I've closed the bug since it now builds, but feel free to re-open it if
we want to revisit removing the flags or anything.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-06 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-03 18:32 bug#67608: qtbase fails to build on i686 Maxim Cournoyer
2023-12-03 19:19 ` John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2023-12-03 23:42 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-12-06 12:21 ` Efraim Flashner [this message]
2023-12-06 22:53 ` Maxim Cournoyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZXBnRPFS61aC1Ppe@3900XT \
--to=efraim@flashner.co.il \
--cc=67608-done@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=john.kehayias@protonmail.com \
--cc=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).