From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id iNMNN/Pi02SmTgAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 21:03:15 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id uF3MNvPi02QjKQEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 21:03:15 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C5B64FE47 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 21:03:15 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1691607795; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=foA8HLuB1UQTxowtfz0pbgHiPaWbKHAhsERPNZpe4Ew=; b=fdt5TFdQzaR6PEMUeAEwIoWkbvJ8A2//NxbjLjgdDuTZQkokG3fKY3nTpuqSOKw2zUJyij h+TSiu6ULW92eEwEEPVV2Nrq853PpXe91RmiJwqfVMkaco42ZOK53pGjNcrU86h0rfvI83 3TrYOMP0b7yUu1tKtAMbfpIJYdYQe0c7hi+/Cr8myZbkAHQyDrejJBA5P3+pe5UUPiHaOf 19rqXADAQ1KJ++9rA4tHizjpMFWmOZSeIef9GR5A79pMVtpx4w598RzevvgcNNUXZ0jnId VTM1gDRSH24etogzN7Wb4eUPo/u85Ti3WpazjtoA/+J5xyaGdIYKT5pLoo+bsQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1691607795; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=oHL0Mr8XsIctTXeceHdzmpepHaWsBuxdgpXy46Ux5BtNHZt7TehyX2PAfbumx+/YpPIl3p syGC9G2KVl4HbZ/POJW4lCUCEJlaijmnoKKRUNrhyeJEBXHTw00PUeIMuGMyZuwQUe6qZ4 geR0usdlSDniAOuubtiNu3PM0ANz1qB7L88FmkTVMPhCELitdgA9XJCNwbZRO1edSns5m2 qOHUJW0Rqdx6hbKKgHQ7okEcmW3RG5/ZihnVDFTvGDK+ZKvfqa32cOZ6SNZf4Gnh7TgFIS Cy8pac2eTTYEsP/Dv0ssGjngX2NXCGWbD38AOEGzhTU6/45UUn55yny2J0f4Iw== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qToSX-0004C7-09; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 15:03:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qToSU-0004Bo-NC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 15:03:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qToSU-0005uF-Ex for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 15:03:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qToSU-0005dG-AE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 15:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#64827: texlive is broken Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 19:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 64827 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 64827@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 64827-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B64827.169160774421602 (code B ref 64827); Wed, 09 Aug 2023 19:03:02 +0000 Received: (at 64827) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2023 19:02:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40519 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qToRr-0005cM-VT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 15:02:24 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::1]:60934) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qToRq-0005c5-BA for 64827@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2023 15:02:22 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D771D89; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 21:02:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hera.aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PyHvzbI95hnS; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 21:02:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:861:c4:f2f0::c64]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C283532C; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 21:02:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 21:02:12 +0200 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: References: <87r0ot1xxm.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r0octbqt.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r0octbqt.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 5C5B64FE47 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx1.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: -5.13 X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.13 X-TUID: HuxZClVQGWFK Hello, Am Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 06:35:22PM +0200 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou: > It would be nice to list what simplifications can be done on > `texlive-bin', so we can apply them on a new "texlive-team" branch. see the last commit on the wip-texlive-mono branch; the commit message and the diff should be quite clear. Concerning the branch itself, it can be directly applied to master once it is in shape, as nothing depends on the monolithic texlive. > On a different topic, it is now possible to install both `texlive' and > `texlive-biber' in a manifest, so re-instating the old `biber' package > may introduce code duplication without much benefit. WDYT? You mean the old/new monolithic texlive from the wip branch and texlive-biber work together? In that case we should indeed drop biber. Andreas