From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id GIlEEDxPLGSUhgEASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 18:24:28 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id kNAmDzxPLGSQAAAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 18:24:28 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F185399ED for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 18:24:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjjS4-00011L-7e; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:24:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjjS1-00010q-L3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:24:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjjRz-0000ZI-3W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:24:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjjRy-0005f5-BW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#62294: gnupg is pinned at 2.2.32 for bug that is fixed upstream Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2023 16:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62294 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Simon Tournier Cc: Ethan Blanton , 62294@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 62294-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62294.168062543221745 (code B ref 62294); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 16:24:02 +0000 Received: (at 62294) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2023 16:23:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50037 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjjRo-0005ef-A1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:23:52 -0400 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:39095) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pjjRl-0005eI-GQ for 62294@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:23:50 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E997E3200A18; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:23:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:23:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=mesmtp; t=1680625422; x=1680711822; bh=DmzZg/uM+847ZJpLlGL9yN3OCzPULuifcrUMC+khIsQ=; b= l0wbUE7WGG+lVhzUHIDRDw5V1FweViRxR7gyWiOr1H28pItF/CaGMyOM514mCihc fDzm0fjO0hyoNIijV27GSUNBMC4ph40DcIoyZTKCk30WJeIFGN43ETw74ymQ7poV aYce3Ww8NVoQnzS9xvMlvXF/87sJR8/E6RZlqrqjUDQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1680625422; x=1680711822; bh=DmzZg/uM+847Z JpLlGL9yN3OCzPULuifcrUMC+khIsQ=; b=qtrZwGxMSBFrmaZ8c0H0tDV7Zr/8g hKYJhwEhFrws2SdXFacnlqquiO6ee9DoNbu4dBI2XZIm35EsvLmiWL0In15jDx6Q 1fEmMmsYUMw41YbgM/kpcPZqkOBQahy88uN50OP8sNJn4uSFxGc+c1f5TeM6m7IW uPV2OHDeAdzfUbWHh/6LG5kaG3bYrGPSRI9q/DZopVJdEM36EsQL0SpSSHSBQDOj 5cbHwi3fUsCc5vkY+w335ZG9GAZsYSCfMECZwmtdsTSrXiQ1NyfNsFoXF+V05/FZ SaxhqeJEifnObZWKFpHoX2W3Xg0wCBUJCHHvDuYWsOkX7R5Z3s/6T+i9w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdeiledguddttdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesth dtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhu lhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieetudehfeekueefleegudfhje fgleehfeeluefhfeffgfeuudelhedvjeelieetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptden ucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i819c4023:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:23:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:23:39 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <868rf8vuz4.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <868rf8vuz4.fsf@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1680625468; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=PI6LuiiJXYyCBG3XgkShJ/m+SctjmgmF6ipboVr3IUibmhR2jyp1i78wYSFomcTzyYQfAw FrQkFk0vv9f4kNQCpkeEG5EW8ze3ARkGP0PRWOiyfeFx0JPhDMzKYNrV4O8IEPpR84hhua QJ9kEl4aBxV6OI692QPwvBozj90HTZzqC/NXi0l8VLWMU9vBobAIYfLCHkD0so8By0DHcs IrTZuzAM8SUw+OjeATcRT3tr8nbBATn5QRIOMZYZ/GFUGuC2I+ZIdtkzvmK6NERn4QSvKc sYTfcmuKP4OA5JL60quJgpmhWbkXTe0Ed9PvoPsD6ouCCES2gxZW2MGu8taWbw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=l0wbUE7W; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=qtrZwGxM; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1680625468; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=DmzZg/uM+847ZJpLlGL9yN3OCzPULuifcrUMC+khIsQ=; b=eEBXGlGAA/BP86ogsR6ulJru6lyNgTWJXWuf9o2IiiwL7w84YRxdGitlPU7yqKi+dItjSs fsSSboJrET+w+RfKG+Uz31YuEERNwJh+LHkibQ5LYUivhuyj53oB/yqzB8E8qTdj9Gaosj VJDfuBxTzUrZk9/Uh7aBBRXOIaSc+1DocBKwxZOwXV9/bWHnSHdOIqhIB/4MSAHH7qeYOG 2Fu6/0AkWPexvLXasPvRtN/zGOgM+yfMDGRNtnux6HE5TmmibiFrnRqUX5A4MbkSPyFzMo PY9TJbq9e3Uirxfei1OMjXrUqjo9CcMlYHmUCV+6dXq//z/KG8DnEYpivv5hTw== X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 2.18 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=l0wbUE7W; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=qtrZwGxM; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Spam-Score: 2.18 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0F185399ED X-TUID: YRxOQmlfvkNo On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 11:48:31AM +0200, Simon Tournier wrote: > On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 09:01, Ethan Blanton via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > > I believe the pin on 2.2.32 can be lifted, but as gnupg is important > > infrastructure I am unsure about directly submitting a patch to update > > to a newer version. Thanks for letting us know! > Well, graft does not seem recommended because it would update to two > versions. And update the package would be a core-updates. > > Well, maybe it could be of the current core-updates dance. Could you > send a patch for core-updates? GnuPG does have a large number of dependent packages, but I'd argue that's either 1) a bug or 2) something we should ignore and update freely. It's a critical package, and did not used to have such a large number of dependents. It's really a problem for the distro if we don't allow ourselves to update packages like this freely.