bug#53194: System test partition.img differs in size across hosts(?)

bug#53194: System test partition.img differs in size across hosts(?)

[Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1509 bytes --]

Guix,

This is weird.  On berlin:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix build 
/gnu/store/91wjmydy556ibl38xydpb8yisp3gvx8w-partition.img.drv
[…]
Creating filesystem with 351 1k blocks and 40 inodes
[…]
/gnu/store/q18ca3ilma0h5hpn4s39xhzn0kc7jm5x-partition.img
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

On my laptop:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix build 
/gnu/store/91wjmydy556ibl38xydpb8yisp3gvx8w-partition.img.drv
[…]
Creating filesystem with 242 1k blocks and 32 inodes
[…]
Copying files into the device: ext2fs_symlink: Could not allocate 
inode in ext2 filesystem while creating symlink "system"
__populate_fs: Could not allocate inode in ext2 filesystem while 
writing symlink"system"
mke2fs: Could not allocate inode in ext2 filesystem while 
populating file system
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

This happens with both a tmpfs and a bcachefs /tmp.

The same make check-system TESTS="openvswitch" fails for Marius as 
well, although I don't know the exact output.  They tested btrfs 
and tmpfs, and suggested a kernel regression.

I don't understand how that would cause this, but I'm forced to 
agree: something spooky is going on in the chroot and the kernel 
is a big variable.

The attached patch was written before I was aware of above 
weirdness and only works around the issue.

Kind regards,

T G-R


[-- Attachment #1.2: 0001-build-image-Account-for-fixed-size-file-system-struc.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1583 bytes --]

From 18f288d4b69faa73ffb75488dbc924640441d7ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 19:56:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] build: image: Account for fixed-size file system structures.

* gnu/build/image.scm (estimate-partition-size): Enforce a 1-MiB minimum.
---
 gnu/build/image.scm | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/build/image.scm b/gnu/build/image.scm
index bdd5ec25a9..81caa424f8 100644
--- a/gnu/build/image.scm
+++ b/gnu/build/image.scm
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 ;;; Copyright © 2016 Christine Lemmer-Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
 ;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017 Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
 ;;; Copyright © 2017 Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
-;;; Copyright © 2020 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
+;;; Copyright © 2020, 2022 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
 ;;; Copyright © 2020 Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
 ;;;
 ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
@@ -62,8 +62,10 @@ (define (size-in-kib size)
 
 (define (estimate-partition-size root)
   "Given the ROOT directory, evaluate and return its size.  As this doesn't
-take the partition metadata size into account, take a 25% margin."
-  (* 1.25 (file-size root)))
+take the partition metadata size into account, take a 25% margin.  As this in
+turn doesn't take any constant overhead into account, force a 1-MiB minimum."
+  (max (ash 1 20)
+       (* 1.25 (file-size root))))
 
 (define* (make-ext-image partition target root
                          #:key
-- 
2.34.0


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 247 bytes --]

bug#53194: System test partition.img differs in size across hosts(?)

[Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 312 bytes --]

The most likely culprit is a change or difference in how the 
kernel answers FILE-SIZE's ‘how much disc space does FILE 
consume?’ — rounding it to N blocks or bytes, including or 
excluding directory sizes, differing reported directory sizes, 
etc.

I'll do more testing.

Kind regards,

T G-R

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 247 bytes --]

bug#53194: System test partition.img differs in size across hosts(?)

[Leo Famulari]

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 08:44:11PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote:
> The most likely culprit is a change or difference in how the kernel answers
> FILE-SIZE's ‘how much disc space does FILE consume?’ — rounding it to N
> blocks or bytes, including or excluding directory sizes, differing reported
> directory sizes, etc.

I'm going to build the version of the kernel used on berlin and test
with that.

I do find myself wondering if something in Guix is measuring the wrong
thing: maybe we are measuring the size of files compressed in transit,
rather than their uncompressed size on disk. Or something like that.

bug#53194: System test partition.img differs in size across hosts(?)

[Leo Famulari]

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 12:23:30AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> I'm going to build the version of the kernel used on berlin and test
> with that.

Actually, I already had it built. This bug still manifests on that version
of the kernel. So...

> I do find myself wondering if something in Guix is measuring the wrong
> thing: maybe we are measuring the size of files compressed in transit,
> rather than their uncompressed size on disk. Or something like that.

I'm still leaning towards something besides a change in the kernel.

bug#53194: System test partition.img differs in size across hosts(?)

[Leo Famulari]

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 12:32:04AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> I'm still leaning towards something besides a change in the kernel.

Using bisection of the Guix Git repo, it seems the problem was
introduced in commit 2d12ec724ea2, "scripts: system: Rationalize
persistency."

bug#53194: System test partition.img differs in size across hosts(?)

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Hi Tobias,

[...]

> diff --git a/gnu/build/image.scm b/gnu/build/image.scm
> index bdd5ec25a9..81caa424f8 100644
> --- a/gnu/build/image.scm
> +++ b/gnu/build/image.scm
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>  ;;; Copyright © 2016 Christine Lemmer-Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
>  ;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017 Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
>  ;;; Copyright © 2017 Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
> -;;; Copyright © 2020 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
> +;;; Copyright © 2020, 2022 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
>  ;;; Copyright © 2020 Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
>  ;;;
>  ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
> @@ -62,8 +62,10 @@ (define (size-in-kib size)
>  
>  (define (estimate-partition-size root)
>    "Given the ROOT directory, evaluate and return its size.  As this doesn't
> -take the partition metadata size into account, take a 25% margin."
> -  (* 1.25 (file-size root)))
> +take the partition metadata size into account, take a 25% margin.  As this in
> +turn doesn't take any constant overhead into account, force a 1-MiB minimum."
> +  (max (ash 1 20)
> +       (* 1.25 (file-size root))))
>  
>  (define* (make-ext-image partition target root
>                           #:key

Looks reasonable to me (although it is interesting that the behavior is
not the same across machines...).

While at it, you may want to fix this docstring:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
 (define (file-size file)
-  "Return the size of bytes of FILE, entering it if FILE is a directory."
+  "Return the size in bytes of FILE, entering it if FILE is a directory."
   (file-system-fold (const #t)
                     (lambda (file stat result)    ;leaf
                       (+ (stat:size stat) result))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

in guix/build/store-copy.scm.

Thanks!

Maxim

bug#53194: System test partition.img differs in size across hosts(?)

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Hello,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Tobias,
>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/gnu/build/image.scm b/gnu/build/image.scm
>> index bdd5ec25a9..81caa424f8 100644
>> --- a/gnu/build/image.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/build/image.scm
>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>  ;;; Copyright © 2016 Christine Lemmer-Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
>>  ;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017 Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
>>  ;;; Copyright © 2017 Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
>> -;;; Copyright © 2020 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
>> +;;; Copyright © 2020, 2022 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
>>  ;;; Copyright © 2020 Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
>>  ;;;
>>  ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
>> @@ -62,8 +62,10 @@ (define (size-in-kib size)
>>  
>>  (define (estimate-partition-size root)
>>    "Given the ROOT directory, evaluate and return its size.  As this doesn't
>> -take the partition metadata size into account, take a 25% margin."
>> -  (* 1.25 (file-size root)))
>> +take the partition metadata size into account, take a 25% margin.  As this in
>> +turn doesn't take any constant overhead into account, force a 1-MiB minimum."
>> +  (max (ash 1 20)
>> +       (* 1.25 (file-size root))))
>>  
>>  (define* (make-ext-image partition target root
>>                           #:key
>
> Looks reasonable to me (although it is interesting that the behavior is
> not the same across machines...).
>
> While at it, you may want to fix this docstring:
>
>  (define (file-size file)
> -  "Return the size of bytes of FILE, entering it if FILE is a directory."
> +  "Return the size in bytes of FILE, entering it if FILE is a directory."
>    (file-system-fold (const #t)
>                      (lambda (file stat result)    ;leaf
>                        (+ (stat:size stat) result))
>
> in guix/build/store-copy.scm.

FYI, I pushed this workaround in
3c3c9d259f87fbc8c1d9551af32e79f9f168f596.

Thanks,

Maxim

bug#53194: System test partition.img differs in size across hosts(?)

[Leo Famulari]

On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 11:42:38PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> FYI, I pushed this workaround in
> 3c3c9d259f87fbc8c1d9551af32e79f9f168f596.

I don't see this commit in the repo.

bug#53194: System test partition.img differs in size across hosts(?)

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Hi Leo!

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 11:42:38PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> FYI, I pushed this workaround in
>> 3c3c9d259f87fbc8c1d9551af32e79f9f168f596.
>
> I don't see this commit in the repo.

Thank you for letting me know.  I hate when this happens; usually the
'make authenticate' fails in my Emacs env because it doesn't run in a
'guix shell -D guix' environment and 'make authenticate' fails due to a
missing dependency, failing the git push.

Anyway, now pushed the linux-libre series for real (which included
this), as e5c06dce93.

Thanks!

Maxim

bug#53194: System test partition.img differs in size across hosts(?)

[Mathieu Othacehe]

Hello,

> FYI, I pushed this workaround in
> 3c3c9d259f87fbc8c1d9551af32e79f9f168f596.

I'm not able to reproduce this issue with or without the workaround, by
running the openvswitch test on Berlin and on my laptop. I think we can
close it for now and re-open it if someone finds a more reliable
reproducer.

Thanks,

Mathieu

bug#53194: System test partition.img differs in size across hosts(?)

[Leo Famulari]

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 08:31:27PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote:
> On my laptop:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ guix build /gnu/store/91wjmydy556ibl38xydpb8yisp3gvx8w-partition.img.drv
> […]
> Creating filesystem with 242 1k blocks and 32 inodes
> […]
> Copying files into the device: ext2fs_symlink: Could not allocate inode in
> ext2 filesystem while creating symlink "system"
> __populate_fs: Could not allocate inode in ext2 filesystem while writing
> symlink"system"
> mke2fs: Could not allocate inode in ext2 filesystem while populating file
> system
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Same here.

> This happens with both a tmpfs and a bcachefs /tmp.

And also on btrfs.

bug#53194: System test partition.img differs in size across hosts(?)

[Leo Famulari]

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 08:31:27PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote:
> This is weird.  On berlin:

Berlin is using ext4, right?

> On my laptop:
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
[...]
> mke2fs: Could not allocate inode in ext2 filesystem while populating file
> system
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> This happens with both a tmpfs and a bcachefs /tmp.

And it fails for me on btrfs, but not on ext4.

I tested with Guix kernels 5.16.5, 5.15.17, and 5.15.15, as well as
Debian's 5.10.0-11-amd64.

bug#53194: System test partition.img differs in size across hosts(?)

[david larsson]

On 2022-01-11 20:31, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix 
wrote:
> Guix,
> 
> This is weird.  On berlin:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ guix build 
> /gnu/store/91wjmydy556ibl38xydpb8yisp3gvx8w-partition.img.drv
> […]
> Creating filesystem with 351 1k blocks and 40 inodes
> […]
> /gnu/store/q18ca3ilma0h5hpn4s39xhzn0kc7jm5x-partition.img
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> On my laptop:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ guix build 
> /gnu/store/91wjmydy556ibl38xydpb8yisp3gvx8w-partition.img.drv
> […]
> Creating filesystem with 242 1k blocks and 32 inodes
> […]
> Copying files into the device: ext2fs_symlink: Could not allocate
> inode in ext2 filesystem while creating symlink "system"
> __populate_fs: Could not allocate inode in ext2 filesystem while
> writing symlink"system"
> mke2fs: Could not allocate inode in ext2 filesystem while populating 
> file system
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> This happens with both a tmpfs and a bcachefs /tmp.
> 
> The same make check-system TESTS="openvswitch" fails for Marius as
> well, although I don't know the exact output.  They tested btrfs and
> tmpfs, and suggested a kernel regression.
> 
> I don't understand how that would cause this, but I'm forced to agree:
> something spooky is going on in the chroot and the kernel is a big
> variable.
> 
> The attached patch was written before I was aware of above weirdness
> and only works around the issue.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> T G-R

I hope Im not totally off here, so Im just hoping this is worth 
mentioning:
Are the hosts using the same version of 
https://github.com/guix-mirror/guix/blob/master/gnu/system/image.scm#96 
? It might produce different sizes if the hosts are on different guix 
commits - or is this not a possibility at all if the derivations have 
the same hashes?

...because I just happened to notice that recently the guix system image 
command produces images that are exactly the additional size of the root 
offset and the esp-partition compared to what's specified with the 
--image-size option. I think this has changed from 1-2 years back (since 
Marius B. blog post reg. Ganeti). I think so because when I set up 
Ganeti according to that blog post I could (IIRC) create guix instances 
with the ganeti-instance-guix create script without problem - and it 
produces images with guix system image --image-size=X command - but when 
I did so again 1-2 weeks ago they failed with the error that Ganeti 
disks were too small. The size issue could be resolved by removing from 
the instance create-script the exact number of bytes to the 
--image-size=X option that corresponded to the root offset and the 
esp-partition sizes as defined in (gnu system image).

Maybe some commit has changed the size output of guix system image?


Best regards,
David