From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id UPCQBipH02GWlAAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 19:57:46 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id rXPkOilH02GDcQEAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 19:57:45 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 217C335AB2 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 19:57:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49632 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4SWd-0008KJ-Uh for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 13:57:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37632) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4SVy-0006vy-Ee for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 13:57:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52895) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n4SVy-0007ph-4g for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 13:57:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4SVy-0004Zb-4S for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 13:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52981: Flatpak GnuPG install conflicts with existing GnuPG install Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 18:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52981 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Erik Winkels Received: via spool by 52981-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52981.164123619017528 (code B ref 52981); Mon, 03 Jan 2022 18:57:02 +0000 Received: (at 52981) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2022 18:56:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36207 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4SVP-0004YZ-0X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 13:56:30 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:37049) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n4SV7-0004Xo-R7 for 52981@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2022 13:56:25 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBAA5C0098; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 13:56:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 03 Jan 2022 13:56:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=uhkpLXTtCQdYLmLvKZ0Ka0c7 xnkb8bVtngtGekN8QYE=; b=IBHs3jxaKMY+tpvq85f6IvGwDWvamSqJbnBwDqY4 SJoXBzl9fzpb4zs2aVYENX9fPcS/vHw+PYv5JSv569lBydZQxdhnodqk2SM6/vJW 2G+MAUGxb6xO2tz7sFCsOB4OVvrkqkK+B0BPizX/2Y8aUToxx37SZPpjPRir4Axf s28= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=uhkpLX TtCQdYLmLvKZ0Ka0c7xnkb8bVtngtGekN8QYE=; b=LOOAoC+BiSN4mg3JTbXPtV X6B50Z/ObmhfcARKn8aU4/KUghk0WROHbcIMFiWyy59xjzE/wQcxhIQtcbNh2d57 rSDcFNUuIswKV2MOd7c2ijP6NuKiyVG1VxCS1njeq6dQFfqpWrq1eCGuw5jaCVBK UVB/491vp6JXy6+mP6J8/i+7hqjun4JbigY24d8lVp3rHI+dY5zF9fFr4gyG0q6y Y4vruaVNmdyVQMIIcrqsV4AjsMzUMSN6BuSxnD2Phqe8HMtMFd0xMSamj5SS5Vbf uun6TOFMGgRw0UaKJ/1URMoPEtPsU9t1GjUUajdzLbzjaddSxyRM9ASVzDccU3NQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrudefuddguddukecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttd ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvvddugefffeeitddthfefvdeuhf fgkeeikeegkeevteeghfeftefggeeuudffieenucffohhmrghinhepghhnuhdrohhrghen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghose hfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 13:56:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 13:56:02 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <2094811750.3099519.1641227297594@ox-webmail.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2094811750.3099519.1641227297594@ox-webmail.xs4all.nl> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 52981@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1641236265; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=uhkpLXTtCQdYLmLvKZ0Ka0c7xnkb8bVtngtGekN8QYE=; b=rGflwdVH0W+J/FXQjRipogPsRIvWNkS8vSDEz1m66zTcMvPBrp3iQM2fWo+sa8b/wD22qY w1UNs+9zpGDKF7jFvZAWEVpeFtHEDAozM5fF9JcxZRUyrZlhI4aa8wfGQ1Xvvnx4HApVs/ g0SPLCNmxRwvf/rk8RHXcFTLxFyO7FAjX50Cw5G3r/YK1zWCx3D1xS3eH59SwILG+KtEzM I5Lnxs9GzrrIU641zmzBki+OoVmHxiKoSsZYpc9CRB4RpX2ZyV9UL+9caGCep9Gw8VrxMz lcgT9rdq148pwGi3TCHiTsFcdDHc8QUaDs4tBDbXcH6dukvJm8qcSuVfX+R/Sg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1641236265; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=HhwMYQzIbuBsaRZgKQh5k0YYIg7RXl2r0JPV3rKasrHwTG7nH509fx8jbawjWquRigOOSr Tx81h4aS9BvyILL+kLZoSdJoPU3HoXc7J9RG1A3W77uAYcVPVwHJUvpgc/aen66Hx9AkUN Ue6y8SqZaC/4Pvb7D/z9kSNdswb7EHOBidilp2SmDq1ge2X4p5iyKrmbm7e2XrGEzLB9/S CviKhhDfBsINqSJDHBA1kReawOlSLDkRar7gACtGeWpjCb19FUYE/sVjUXPl5oOyl8SMTn 2SxqcIeagavMlsm00gc5jfK81V8EZyPHOxJvwR7SqoWnqffESlqv4VoTH5xNvw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=IBHs3jxa; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=LOOAoC+B; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.19 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=IBHs3jxa; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=LOOAoC+B; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 217C335AB2 X-Spam-Score: -2.19 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: Y4Irj2EXBffZ On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 05:28:17PM +0100, Erik Winkels wrote: > When doing a `guix install flatpak` while having `gnupg` already installed as a user package I get this error: > > ``` > $ guix package --list-installed > [...] > gnupg 2.2.32 out /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32 > > $ guix install flatpak > The following package will be installed: > flatpak 1.12.1 > guix install: error: profile contains conflicting entries for gnupg > guix install: error: first entry: gnupg@2.2.30 /gnu/store/0snfzd41n430ddpq316j9v2z5fn2y62m-gnupg-2.2.30 > guix install: error: ... propagated from flatpak@1.12.1 > guix install: error: second entry: gnupg@2.2.32 /gnu/store/75122spwjdkxxgd32gkkil3n7ifax8i5-gnupg-2.2.32 > hint: Try upgrading both `flatpak' and `gnupg', or remove one of them from the profile. Thanks for the report. This is fallout from the fix for , where GnuPG 2.2.30 was released with significant bugs and we didn't notice until we'd already deployed it for users. Unfortunately, gnupg-2.2.30 has ~2400 dependent packages: ------ $ guix refresh -l gnupg@2.2.30 Building the following 1324 packages would ensure 2425 dependent packages are rebuilt: [...] ------ So, we can't upgrade it directly on the master branch. I'll look into upgrading Flatpak's dependency on GnuPG. > Worse, initially the Flatpak install did not complain because I had GnuPG installed as a system package. After installing Flatpak `gpg` mostly stopped working with `gpg-agent` segfaulting. It took a while to figure out Flatpak's GnuPG was the culprit. Oof :(