From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0OrVLXaHw2GvNQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 21:15:50 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id eI5mKXaHw2F1HQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 20:15:50 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25A5A9191 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 21:15:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52354 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n081d-0000zr-8g for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:15:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n07xy-0002lW-HI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:12:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n07xy-0000W1-6c for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:12:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n07xy-0007JR-0f for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:12:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#52667: System reconfiguration fails to build linux-modules.drv Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 20:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52667 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Received: via spool by 52667-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52667.164020391028090 (code B ref 52667); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 20:12:01 +0000 Received: (at 52667) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2021 20:11:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59787 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n07xl-0007Iz-KO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:11:49 -0500 Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.25]:33855) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n07xj-0007In-UT for 52667@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:11:48 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F84532000CC; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:11:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:11:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=Qm5c75U+/odEmRbVKRQxN6yN yadOt/hWkZInGLSFZbM=; b=kes4Hgnzz3Nq3LygUA3rkOvSQ2hIQMYBamR1PtRD wI3RCcqGeDdVh+WLK8rOLzj9YZHECYDLPTVH+bw70SQrT/dEQ0iF49Evlmssi9Mx sab876UNutqt3ScH7BfxAkUGdELtPRs9N2vhcWQjyeTvwTHtu4GV7s1xbcU1svxG w8s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Qm5c75 U+/odEmRbVKRQxN6yNyadOt/hWkZInGLSFZbM=; b=C6K6kSiJZByzIvDnIQezf0 aAAFgdAFV1NwQ1hIT1ob6MrXQY2CBBHlOSfB907NG2lAG2JpUK9m8YrYzVaK4WSS IvRe3VnjqBeaYq6FZAT+p0qHRVCg363Ehu/QGrI4SKDb+yWyNla/H2CfmPJkxb5r KTmGzlOtvDIN6hHOm+5Mue03mbXFQ8sDmqvsvI/AByY+x7mnCAL8vHiXCrYhwPns NMIUMCWtaJTJsxfpYJZM1NuV4U1K6khoYLVonGkZKnAxa6geTt8147sgC2wFn00q I0TfGwHOvi3e4EPru2BcrzT8x9fBlit88OJ6Qvy6FnAuailfQ6upB8Sfd/MEmCrg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddruddtiedguddvkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttd ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhl rghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeukeektdffvddtudegjeegtdevhf eufeeivdejiedtieegtdevjedvjeehffevgfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecu rfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:11:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:11:38 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <871r28uyc7.fsf@planete-kraus.eu> <87tuf1efn8.fsf@nckx> <2e16e98b78683bf669bfc3fa26224a39@tobias.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2e16e98b78683bf669bfc3fa26224a39@tobias.gr> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 52667@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1640204150; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=Qm5c75U+/odEmRbVKRQxN6yNyadOt/hWkZInGLSFZbM=; b=edcWwvtf2DUIJakOoropFF3zY5imXhsVD7zYqvhYVqQaHc5Bw+pu6IuTnOuwujG/1kieF3 PHgDb8AMYCRY/jyS3fxDegAwNyX57cgVMEdMVM1FPaHzbqqQiCrfqIJm1lpHWzoIoEmk/n 7zY0vteO65Ig2iRspz8sXowW4GVcrG7nxL7ddrVqc3vsUF6MKptWo4JCDHFHrJMpZTkx0K h218McnD8FeqWyPzjBJO1Vd0j9t/5S6g431jxPeJ8SbgDYNva3JFdqrTwCbjB6XA7zNzFs MmJZx7YrWUVPApbHbE02icsoQPyEWjiFHqbrQlxKvwZlSYdvpqLYaH0y/UTGqQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1640204150; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=BW7vdc1Wv3TD0M5lafVIG/VNgpG39A8RjIcPtTbOd+O7Szg9GG95wM4xXmiNEIVY2UTusx zrMjeKaux0xu5dXx60V8Ka/wselExZ13qJsP4D9fu9wjHohclXciOUuqx70FKgsAaIYmFI 1HSuc6JnkgawYzCWge6b6E0PryLs8Dqo/aP2mHvQzBK79qa8Y2TQ96tdbrqVaQ5KRS8xaT NnfmQuy5zTFLOZR1ayaLIoNhiQ+fy7XJvtrlkSN4u5k4CAfAMJWz8o6BPael/kfXpyccII BMCYcirCaF7t057KlYCHs+NImDcosq+ODK0u4OV5hcxdU3TmNrDvUsEbTw53rw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=kes4Hgnz; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=C6K6kSiJ; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.64 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=kes4Hgnz; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=C6K6kSiJ; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 25A5A9191 X-Spam-Score: -3.64 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: cLvB1L1PCk3e On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 08:25:27PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > This. Well, I guess this episode demonstrates that people are using 5.15, 5.10, and not much else. It's useful information. > > I'm inclined to just revert the commit that introduced the regression > > until we have a better solution... > > I think this is merely trading one regression for another, IMO *slightly* > nastier one. And no, I'm not personally affected by this bug :-) Okay. From my point of view, things were fine until we added the simplefb module. So that was the regression. > > Your approval as definitely-not-our-linux-libre-maintainer would be one of > the major factors. If you have no opinion, I doubt anyone else will object. > Realistically, the only way to tease out any unknown users out there is to > try it. I have no opinion :)