From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id sJwGERvxuGF9lAAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 20:31:39 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id aLO0DBvxuGGeTAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 19:31:39 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C750D1BB for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 20:31:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35080 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxDWT-0000J5-Uz for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:31:37 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxDVu-0000Gn-UH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:31:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48108) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxDVu-0006Va-Kd for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:31:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxDVu-0005Td-Bw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:31:02 -0500 Subject: bug#49921: go-1.16 build failing on aarch64: "fatal error: runtime.newosproc" Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 19:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 49921 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Sarah Morgensen Mail-Followup-To: 49921@debbugs.gnu.org, leo@famulari.name, iskarian@mgsn.dev Received: via spool by 49921-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D49921.163951020720976 (code D ref 49921); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 19:31:02 +0000 Received: (at 49921-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2021 19:30:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59653 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxDV1-0005SG-Fi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:30:07 -0500 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:53365) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxDUw-0005QC-7g for 49921-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:30:06 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF953200F9F; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:29:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:29:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=OVEXGNOzkHuG08j+QH/zmc2Q +1uI7We3ieJGpCiY1kg=; b=mKN2AOv5I7nbAZVl346cFrE9WNBGz2al0+D2vP+g RQDElde1Ki3wDWYGjfPaa14q9PArdUsuAF7aeZHuO6azBcUvOkMrtZiUCnDuDm9B qCAj2Uh0kjpBhda3FvAJu51iho8RAOe64CXwSKPgQJhdgJW2T4NDuk03UgNV77/W LKc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=OVEXGN OzkHuG08j+QH/zmc2Q+1uI7We3ieJGpCiY1kg=; b=ekJVeOej0qP6gjxOZ9o8nJ rJ+firbLnRWfrmcenZ8QPywtvMK3nRpycE/mvhHAzGhXQCfLSQ7rXljg1avFF5fo drepjxaqa7vGlajwuOduFU3vsmlOuv6qhvOdwcOat5vYGoPwr//398Uz44YVnoAd z/uwPklqK3o+6Wc4rPwOYAc+jC7FqKslL2sYkt31L1g9GC3TC/s6ALUtyDm3LoaT w9ahRIAX3HBJz6XAnOhL0qr2oWAO7F2suvRjUouWJ4jC25AwWjJQmzwXB8McRpOx VPkbVjS+C9R/nFEvtlS4p7XtQ3Rxs1iJoGMZs68jjV9TOIs7tJrurkqaQAJEDygQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrledtgdduvdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtre dttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgr rhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvddvudegffefiedttdfhfedvuefhgf ekieekgeekveetgefhfeetgfegueduffeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehgnhhurdhorhhgnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfh grmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:29:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:29:51 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <861r75j164.fsf@mgsn.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <861r75j164.fsf@mgsn.dev> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 49921-done@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1639510299; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-to:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=OVEXGNOzkHuG08j+QH/zmc2Q+1uI7We3ieJGpCiY1kg=; b=uM3IH2Vt93B7rgvHxpp+ERkOUBVdnSuAesA3LxSfNrHwwZW+0uKXfRrSx/PNrgI/ASAfeO L2Aq0hXn8YBpljsR/o5CcnnGaOWZ7IP9P6zwG8NEwjgGHFA7FTs8C/iEwVIlWF5LWzk5Tf yat4IUALaCBjgP89ayU1PugKmde7Vhar4UUr06ARgYzOeSGJzmY1MTsH4uP9rdIN31RVzJ Y3+9XqKmoeBXidxv6CMGd8UlOawzrrDB39Gopw2BoLmuzRMK7Wp+/S0uxebmSzegs04mQp QZGsIGHJvEiRDP2agomTKmVON/wkgXdLgf2okVRpqMp0D2KnaDhvNgbwNrAliQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1639510299; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=P6s5na4NT3foL0ZdiWJfxMK5iItUHraEN9ifml53Bc8gxm9BkB23ZJpyUM1ggnfYa2orAC 7U/KWjYbwkchEPS1OVa/s5qgRXzYj/1lqldo6i1ofk47ijZwzVVs68+c6JMGz/Blsq7M1Y J9CjO+ptB1jV51wkTtELr6kJEYdo83ALrqg1o9lg9B71OnUwkiGbuKCJxeyRLJV+MwkwAH tVw+dkwj8a+7mLC4VpPKUGMdpUsIXSiLdZ8ae0XH7finhi/xWtuNbpf9QmVx5EakSS83+d mIN3U/FHfWnlWcA1p0q0U5bSgZnu0zpuUDwmAE1crrryEkhctKUmrTgtHoXWBg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=mKN2AOv5; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=ekJVeOej; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.07 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=mKN2AOv5; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=ekJVeOej; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0C750D1BB X-Spam-Score: -3.07 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: MxjITuiFaP9+ On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 10:04:19PM -0700, Sarah Morgensen wrote: > I just noticed go-1.16 is failing on aarch64 [0]. I am not having any > success tracking down the cause. It looks like the error is the same as > was happening for go-1.14 circa 11 Mar [1], which was fixed by 9 Apr > [2], but I cannot tell what resolved the issue. I've attached the > relevant part of the build log; the full log is available at [0]. I was able to build Go 1.16 on aarch64-linux, by building this derivation "by hand" on the Berlin server. It was offloaded to real aarch64 hardware. /gnu/store/jgbp8bpi86is2y620wqais904lvjmvj8-go-1.16.11.drv https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1952349/details If I understand correctly, we have totally disabled the aarch64 emulated builds. They were problematic and I think that we should not re-enable them. So, I'm closing this bug. Please let us know if you think it should be re-opened.