From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id sAHzFHc2tWCfWAEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 21:18:15 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 8HkXEHc2tWDqZgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 19:18:15 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 689AF22689 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 21:18:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55028 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lnnQS-0000ox-H1 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 31 May 2021 15:18:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42702) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lnnQJ-0000m6-BP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2021 15:18:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lnnQJ-0002pG-3x for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2021 15:18:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lnnQI-0002yy-VL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2021 15:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46829: `guix pull` uses incorrect certificate store Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 19:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46829 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 46829-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46829.162248868211456 (code B ref 46829); Mon, 31 May 2021 19:18:02 +0000 Received: (at 46829) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 May 2021 19:18:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34910 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lnnQI-0002yg-47 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2021 15:18:02 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:55977) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lnnQG-0002yH-Id for 46829@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2021 15:18:01 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800335C0200; Mon, 31 May 2021 15:17:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 31 May 2021 15:17:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=+PYfGU/xowR4vLpKUEfpZnu4oeZ1hhtCJyhuS+8rWF4=; b=f2JE+Zjc4lUa Ia7gFz1K4BK8FIUWwXGiOXcJjCADG/4uX7v2NWE3RFJjV5UyDyDalUFb9/VK4Hi4 wr5ksftsWnCXCECOoyfuDu1sdrb5mI6XZdouLjcrDScoJb/CfVDY72IniUpV8WOn 6xVObrAP6+T9UHI1oUM1EyXozARW4QU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=+PYfGU/xowR4vLpKUEfpZnu4oeZ1hhtCJyhuS+8rW F4=; b=g1lfPnnfHCX8mZgM6rW674/agVKXY7IbB6XcXrkhwS4bAAXYEOs5g8MRn Op+9+5+/D0+Qs7+XJQyTFXQsz0yF05xTpBj8ESg1aJ+o6mn4qY5bgiwDssZQHGBy ANtAMNhxQTdH//Yy81rRY+uxaJNE+MUIBGmx8Pbe8SYr/DZSiIei2vPW54q3dm/v ne3qAsnfGOfqZMqBzKJ38HAjO2MuABILmSUjbyi4l0xz7Q7QyC3qQjsysCKiSRUN fPc1TRSoCON0mYTsDWYKa+/JN0qdWRlf1t1qtCc4eTe4JBqK/kTwDXuNgtQ+ZFuy 8FWL31oKoVYDRZN7w7GDljPhsgeaA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdelfedgudefjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtkeertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefnvgho ucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeegjeeggeehtddugfffuddtvdfffeffjeekffffveffheegvddvuedtffek jeejjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 31 May 2021 15:17:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 15:17:53 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <871rd0ebd5.fsf@cbaines.net> <877dmrtbvn.fsf@gnu.org> <877dm54zk3.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgy2leg9.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87im4pf8cg.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87im4pf8cg.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 46829@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1622488695; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=+PYfGU/xowR4vLpKUEfpZnu4oeZ1hhtCJyhuS+8rWF4=; b=B9VeHeeRCfgov1iPDZDuOa8IDkXZ4vH1mDJXPWi+zW31jCjBRm1efvLWvufhWlvjJI9Qs5 xUTpvd1LJWoEe4tldEH4blu2gaa4F5D0jDgQH90CcsWGlSE+K76WF5G5YhvfQDpBZgFYDu VqGkaupGvQuKapMLni/eLY8w6j1Leuteq3NbKlEiRG29/XJIobDIJ8UvqsVhnYGDtfuqju uPJSh1TcM6+26ggSe8TI/sKd1sGbR2YcxM/tLZif1aT2xXgys9Pevty++V+tdoR4ftlO40 RHTKHy6evvYeSvRJkxMMIOrDa8xcQxb99gcJ4czANiRG9bWAGBgytfneIqs/ug== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1622488695; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=mCESIDEpRO5EczdeTq3FJTKptSLLbCIK+CAwOfPgFqwA1z2pAhhHVZkPFeK11aUsCvIWvC XWEeglnTX2EUveOixEM+zQoXx7muIx4nr/CdT7PbnOKKHi4MWYqBUC3ZjEZos1BHWONJN9 cglFu3ZRB5ZOhtKu9qgwHPyb8ts1saPV05EwfRakgiCK8vnyzln48x20owxHQsY9+FHRQm xhSGVE9142orPrw30vLBQVcn4aq4fUgZixhLp/YUET8S0HC/x+pgA/qV3GIW+fxzki+o0B jm5qF9uVi5hMNq3+LY45NxGNYB1HhFH4DRQnW2B93GbC/HKyI3LRivR/UK6mQg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=f2JE+Zjc; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=g1lfPnnf; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.43 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=f2JE+Zjc; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=g1lfPnnf; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 689AF22689 X-Spam-Score: -1.43 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: L17liG2AuEW3 On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:50:39PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > OK. 5 years still looks kinda “frequent” to me. I would think that old > software installations (including “appliances”) would live longer than > that, no? > > You install Guix on a laptop, you leave it in a drawer, and you come a > few years later and you can neither access HTTPS web sites nor run ‘guix > pull’? Yeah, that's bad. Let's go ahead with adding some kind of '--allow-insecure-transport' option to `guix pull` for this use case. Bonus points for making it sounds as scary as possible :)