From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id MJAzFuTkeGAoDgEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:14:12 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id gHv+D+TkeGD8OgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 01:14:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F11F0E4D3 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:14:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38834 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXD3g-0002V7-W8 for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:14:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49168) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXD3a-0002Uy-IE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:14:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56301) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXD3a-0005xU-Aw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:14:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXD3a-00087B-4c for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47812: Incorrect code in the Guix manual, but only on the website Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 01:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47812 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mark H Weaver Received: via spool by 47812-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47812.161853559931134 (code B ref 47812); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 01:14:02 +0000 Received: (at 47812) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2021 01:13:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39614 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXD2s-000865-PT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:13:18 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:35481) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXD2o-00085l-4t for 47812@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:13:17 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035365C010B; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:13:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:13:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=S1AU/1opB+pbARKJDdgfa//u AgV4gxLgktFBSF59WLY=; b=tdTY01n+VJ1K1D//0jXcwELz5j/qZADJXwwUCj6E WdWFJUd3GAKPUI0AZwLOem7Hy1fr8l2b6m9oocA9mHwSgoB9oX6yflnMPS7p81gI Gdw26o4IoKTS+0XhrQ/+3+Cr03bv7FDMtjsy9ZCLPnHyqUhyTcVnrZ6teJcjJE7I js0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=S1AU/1 opB+pbARKJDdgfa//uAgV4gxLgktFBSF59WLY=; b=aPFD1bTus/hQs2qucHsG+1 Ff3mKuBDnzbaUL9PNexmh9vfostM6vo+Twa6PtA6tVkcwYOwnMjW3NkTILHv4zs8 yYmS79HXRXFdM9xF3+n1CshFFFE0MRPAakYBXUiGfVsGW801rX93ZSxVqDfzQU1J o9eFQHG2O2alUe7OhEfqzTuaxFLeSi70fCT9ej84xDWW1ruyvEk9k4IxlzfeDYTK KTEl7o3B2lqcIbC6PsxpVh2Li10/VZaL+3QSZ2O6H2GqDGDKPgfv3GcbRJy9iQ/Y 6z4S3f2EmZEQq4mBro22omIWWKTe+XsH3zPpAxtb9Sa0eVGkjB2mv3DKvCUI/+rQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudelgedggeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtre dttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgr rhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvddvudegffefiedttdfhfedvuefhgf ekieekgeekveetgefhfeetgfegueduffeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehgnhhurdhorhhgnecu kfhppedutddtrdduuddrudeiledruddukeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4296E108005F; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:13:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 21:13:03 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <87r1jbgl8r.fsf@netris.org> <87o8efgk93.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o8efgk93.fsf@netris.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 47812@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1618535652; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=S1AU/1opB+pbARKJDdgfa//uAgV4gxLgktFBSF59WLY=; b=hmo9IVxf2E2o+6RygNfbQNIzAI7FyGeKbETM4NbugUBHku2g5c336Dbj51JBhFFH51d9cE q66L8dWRU3zTi1WULLvZxfy6uLWLjj2C9WMJPFQ99NDMl/qqdTUSt+ItWMfMTXhB9RTuPQ Rbfx3Hp0TDg6z7PmlnmpDT8m3RHK2lb+oYs95NDen8scnAlt929u0CwTVVLtwBpm8fpFvQ s0Y5osV0zy2j59AUtQMaNz34O/biMjDpEWMY5Im0fGsMiUHh/fyanXf12b//AU9RtMDBSg tfzOZuoG3j2QUh97m9CifaNXqiW/BhV+dlTaSqAajpRqvU766xo+s9ZWCiVxaw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1618535652; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=MtXh3WIMG4s/OV2pChiBK55KnJ/9erQEDaGBJzulvcdRoTup+R++F34FNbMA3e5B6jS3hf zHmYymzuN2jt+YlhpekUF6Z3OuFojKsdJHVhS7g8ZHPa0p1ZJVqbmKY3hg5pxXTdqRQX/1 7flszuXA03Exlo2rN6rWyfQUH3BX9w84BAW9HMGjBL6eJ2D2sptVB7iqcWeJ7O3OWC7OUk oNeXxXjFyUrxnBeQVev1dR93+0ccSQf+VvWBISLShfbKQU88opY4Qw4qu/i3rwjhUluvtM r8kOTfIin79sCNc52JKntHXbBl2KL6rQdBQSFXh+tkRhLC2qtdxrsucVGscM0Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=tdTY01n+; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=aPFD1bTu; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.44 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=tdTY01n+; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=aPFD1bTu; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: F11F0E4D3 X-Spam-Score: -1.44 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: usudGq6S2YKH On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:12:13PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Mark H Weaver writes: > > > The correct text was added about 2 years ago, in the following commit: > > > > https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=dbef9015db107dd148133420b89af552ef08f8ee > > > > I see no evidence of it being changed since then. > > > > Any idea where the incorrect code on the website manual is coming from? > > I see now that this new functionality was added to the 'staging' branch > 3 days ago: > > https://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?h=staging&id=a247f5c7537df7e0c09051ba22d5c95eb08f48b9 > > It seems inappropriate for our online website manual to be taken from > 'staging'. It has already led to an experienced Guix developer > repeatedly suggesting (to a new user) a code snippet that cannot > possibly work on the 'master' branch: Hm, that's not supposed to happen. It's supposed to be based on the 'master' branch.