From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id SLs6FxILcmDkNgEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 22:31:14 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id kCkhERILcmBNIwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 20:31:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65B7A1E3B6 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 22:31:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36066 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVKG7-0003C4-Gu for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:31:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVKFy-0003B7-L5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:31:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41847) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVKFy-0005UD-Dw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:31:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lVKFy-0002Fi-9w for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46829: Fresh install of 1.2.0 can't guix pull Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 20:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46829 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Christopher Baines Received: via spool by 46829-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46829.16180866528642 (code B ref 46829); Sat, 10 Apr 2021 20:31:02 +0000 Received: (at 46829) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2021 20:30:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53393 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lVKFo-0002FK-KI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:30:52 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:41559) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lVKFl-0002F5-Uv for 46829@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:30:51 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6853F5C010B; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:30:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:30:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=kqmCUJRRP7jy+5ZrdBkIdTumaD5JBVykOkbjv1ty0cI=; b=h/IXVTwg+N73 jAdeV32GFn4rRHZ1Oa1x7Trpkj3EPb2EMVkJwSzuq+nfphCQjdTLyz+5gXcZvgXw 5PF21UWj+Fa8zeQO+vsZ1ReXvOMLpTN6SdPjzlNs/Jv6BK27E3x/RAbFumDv/Lho 0uCgn61xdFKFee9Y4wuCcqIndW15imk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=kqmCUJRRP7jy+5ZrdBkIdTumaD5JBVykOkbjv1ty0 cI=; b=SHqm757h3fNQAa9+d5SIlm4dxMOH8L3qUzeNq6fqN8+/RpdQjvS/lKmcS 8M8LFruXdL+uxnpFDa6/Hw8eEM6jInhX/hB2Fv6+SJ6ZlNBhvW5Tun+UH2gHOuN9 w1Osvz6qXKkserGgdjkRePtQX2ySgysM1eYWPxcz0rwgxiPAxELncTJK0cd4cXGt JcOneo7O+Io6MiLMUoPqpQEGPgUwT7cLIRaGWwZ3/t1doqm1S3GMYjBUXrNA3Bln LgDse+ox7Dgqsv1KRh/grifC8SCT/LfhYf/xwcVxp4kjRU6bKccEayODfo4RJ4Ct S+oei0W70pTYnJF1WOTVsWLaZwz3A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudekfedgudehudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtugfgjgesth hqredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhu lhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgeefieejteeftedvffeffeelfe eluedutddvtdfhkedtudehkeffveevfeevtdeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehgnhhurdhorhhg necukfhppedutddtrdduuddrudeiledruddukeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 032921080064; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:30:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 16:30:42 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <871rd0ebd5.fsf@cbaines.net> <874kgd2ab1.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <874kgd2ab1.fsf@cbaines.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 46829@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1618086673; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=kqmCUJRRP7jy+5ZrdBkIdTumaD5JBVykOkbjv1ty0cI=; b=BBK+ZxLpMXdby35HSc/ji5/lBB/d3KeCFuRSaFgJATrDrPpM7uPKVCPFpHzC4hOUqTF+5S xQ4BWXRVaH3cpygdDwtHiV8yROhtQ6GOaWEuSRaY1nQdCsq6jidl28LW6HsN1S5s2B3//Y CNM5XGgdplGAVm39KG+wNxncpADffn+/vg0oktoztmHZP2vFQG/V/pOIbwfDend4bLAJqE X/Nko9I1T0/CFidH42Zn3BRYoAj6zfAjTw56mYbfpn0HnFodYd529jtya7EA+xVY93L3kv L9Jb/UpYayo2YBYfHd99/kCx7TGjPHdEP/FEFntGK34pC+J0FTXd8xThWNDLFw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1618086673; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=c1jt3Q2D4iiSJAAGXwiAxpHJce0KAazsHJl/UhEG+Cm0dndqF+A16Y2z130D/1Dk38FqU0 K74oX7gueYLN92uI42+/PtTp0uBOG2P91S1BnnYZ59I2n5KPwoGBD8oS4vRce/7H1chI8h YRSbL0ZxgSJcR+y0Od1StaKPUyYhOiHQZ31BqQ8B6DN9Epmsm3bpQ/Uq06L8zA5vpB8eSG KkRZPyn19iWGcUxR7OZeNGJNIkUZGXRKp1l6GGop9k/HR8vERvae/NbuO6osZQUpNy/QBB f9OXZiiUksiKXrGuSbCJe79d2UYCPxuIARwxABQjGEWinm4PjYR18rvbcnunyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="h/IXVTwg"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=SHqm757h; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.44 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b="h/IXVTwg"; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=SHqm757h; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 65B7A1E3B6 X-Spam-Score: -1.44 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: J6+bfVS2Pn/5 On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 08:45:22PM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote: >=20 > Leo Famulari writes: >=20 > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 10:27:02AM +0000, Christopher Baines wrote: > >> I believe there's TLS issues with pulling for the current 1.2.0 releas= e. > > > > On a fresh Debian ISO image, I installed Guix 1.2.0 based on the > > instructions in the manual section Binary Installation. > > > > Then, `guix pull` succeeded for me, no problem. > > > > Can anyone reproduce still reproduce this bug? >=20 > I'm pretty sure I experienced this with a fresh install of Guix System, > I should have given more information in the initial report. Okay, I'm testing this now, in a VM. I wonder if it's the same thing as ?