From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id kBMfC3GZMWD4IAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 23:21:21 +0000 Received: from aspmx2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 2Hi8BnGZMWCkegAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 23:21:21 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx2.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 322FB1959C for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 00:21:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57630 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDbYo-0002MN-N2 for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:21:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDbYd-0002Ln-Dp for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:21:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41548) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDbYc-0003pI-Be for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:21:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDbYc-0000xl-7J for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:21:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46666: package addition/update patch submissions Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 23:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46666 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andy Tai Received: via spool by 46666-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46666.16138632593673 (code B ref 46666); Sat, 20 Feb 2021 23:21:02 +0000 Received: (at 46666) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2021 23:20:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53094 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDbYY-0000xB-LK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:20:58 -0500 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:49019) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDbYW-0000wx-KU for 46666@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:20:57 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EAD864; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:20:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:20:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=J2hkBlDRLtcwnKiB30Opr8gx cAD0LiE0MIXwRUv2VWw=; b=yZfcW3x1XGtfdzlI6iaAMVxRluujNSt0zacAVA+9 778wDSASr2rhuK7+0Y0NBqc3OfZycriUSZ9hkrMiqXgvmH1ffx656FE4o6HgP7k0 gxFTPPBOs9NzjjkO0tV/4fdehbkc6J3NBsBuVXuT4hT1gWKrEnFjDaZeoUcWezf8 XaY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=J2hkBl DRLtcwnKiB30Opr8gxcAD0LiE0MIXwRUv2VWw=; b=oo5xsp9hHm8f2a8Ll31gb0 QUwkfKdla6BwtZ7kDjnBQMWexArAAujLN9r5jMIangQbgZhT80aGm5wjYoT91xMp k5HwTIuc8SmoLuVrti1aSi9I6B+9pXTLkJAKmbrpKS70SVGrwJcPf7Tqz7JV0Fzr bSz3jVLLlPfuSiJfTHQ17FlqN/ad0ZZh3PrpogWCbkFKVq+AxXbJRL6c7eEZq5OE OefdvI/aOkG+4GD82Zy4ZTLN6Id+yOwXvFKx2m5kTyOS/5+AHxyZt5JQgHF2C/Wm GXkc+sDBdWA8v4fNPC6dG/+OxCzSqxkq+OZoo5D7ys/Gcmc+8mIdStP62V2QCIlw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrjeelgddtjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertd dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghr ihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeukeektdffvddtudegjeegtdevhfeufe eivdejiedtieegtdevjedvjeehffevgfenucfkphepieelrdduvddtrdelvddrvddtkeen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghose hfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ool-45785cd0.dyn.optonline.net [69.120.92.208]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 10987240057; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:20:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:20:47 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 46666@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.37 Authentication-Results: aspmx2.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=yZfcW3x1; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=oo5xsp9h; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx2.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 322FB1959C X-Spam-Score: -1.37 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: UEsh16aBRSd5 On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 01:32:02PM -0800, Andy Tai wrote: > Hi, I wonder if package patch submitter can in any way help to speed > up the review of such patches? I sent some patches some of which > received quick feedback but some seem to be waiting for review for > quiet some time. I understand all these are done by volunteers. I > hope package patches can be applied more quickly to make Guix more "up > to date" as a GNU/Linux distribution. Just curious if there is any > guideline to make package addition or update patches easier for the > reviewers to process, thus speeding up submission application. Thanks Hi Andy, I'll take a look at your open patches now and either push them or send feedback. I'll also try to give feedback about easing the review process.