From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id OJKIEV2YPmA8cgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 19:56:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id yONQDV2YPmCGIQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 19:56:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DE8B87C7 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 20:56:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41412 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHB7r-0007Me-8a for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 14:56:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHB7i-0007ME-SB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 14:56:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHB7i-0000L6-L6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 14:56:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHB7i-0003cA-Kh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 14:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46877: Guix assumes ideal network exists, does not Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 19:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46877 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 46877@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 46877@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46877-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46877.161471491513826 (code B ref 46877); Tue, 02 Mar 2021 19:56:02 +0000 Received: (at 46877) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2021 19:55:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54287 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHB6x-0003aw-Fr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 14:55:15 -0500 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:42225) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lHB6u-0003aQ-OP for 46877@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2021 14:55:13 -0500 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DB316CF; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 14:55:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 02 Mar 2021 14:55:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=ShRZXfnP1vzGgTioQlQ2RTEB1/8FpSDR/dOl4zWI7Bg=; b=PoQKz46pm1pl P4MroDQ8WfoCJGSnYLVgAZyM8uACzvzWQtkxJmKp21wV9gLMnwk/YzqQBDVDNSk4 zNqEA/9q+tebPkuNhbnw3YF5zt7/j9Fui8BlhAC6uzDiU1armrCcVs0ZTTaFmvRO V4D13gYLtBmFdWWxMHtTb60d1pgJKsw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ShRZXfnP1vzGgTioQlQ2RTEB1/8FpSDR/dOl4zWI7 Bg=; b=JvmiiJfAhHs9I2o78IWLgqBi06xb1htaTTItNqaEy6vFzPPFPzOeHtWSE nLz0HiyegyyYiFy9CsglDXc+sbPcyPK+2pOkWTyfUicopqQly9Lsu6RLmmEMXI5V 5AojP2BRGvSSeB9tyBpGD4OgCdTRA5qYqmGOp/dkB0QPDMHU4RhlJmfj4M7vQC/5 Elzd2ipFwJrQ1bwJ8JmA8AGZliTY7iT4kvjk6iAJ9hmBtO4By99wmTazdt29PbCo i209+RBBnuoLAGnfodc4nn4WlivCcC8Ocau42FCf9H/0YfxP8xB0WV6KLNb8ktFp vOiEAYHuSD+G4XZJ/0VvNjtBd0LGA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddttddguddvgecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtqhertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefnvgho ucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeejleevjefhkeelhffgtdfgfeegtefhgfehhefgffdtteffueeghedtieej leeigeenucffohhmrghinhepthhosghirghsrdhgrhenucfkphepuddttddruddurdduie elrdduudeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhho mheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 07828240054; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 14:55:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 14:55:02 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <87eegxms7h.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <87eegxms7h.fsf@nckx> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1614714972; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=ShRZXfnP1vzGgTioQlQ2RTEB1/8FpSDR/dOl4zWI7Bg=; b=kPlZMwBmLRK/brCb9GgqdEGOAN5bVXBdVAOGs/7fLByFltNvS5E7VMQOGYBn0V5zX8SWmi hNaCsCM7QC1n60z34oOCZ7madCFr6N6V/h+J+HoRr3EI1DDit9WO3Z6xguukP0c7yISHR5 9UXd9h3mylgDlv6fncA61LpLeJv2AYoOTowwgcnfeNOaK0IvfQYv7+TQ1hU37kUgbKEtXe hRGc/iwDF1InidHoQo1etEE+Os/Lu0kgYNPhQbW2qL1FxSoF3y0wmUjJsAsfVMz82xlG4o U1hq5DVn/62BI5JjHHq+3yaLr3uKOENAJ9/J1PjT83CidnujbUjcfnd3ppMQVw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1614714972; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=tiXnvSY/8S6b61yfxToACbG+/uQ43ar1dWE2g2JeamQnYlO3cEPKX0JxVNDkOjt8FynQ7l F6lrqo3YPgByDexjBcStgGVZbRhsF77ilYWieU4Mr8XwsajHizFZp8XZ04GJKQ1LLrN1SJ i5tYxgL4qtUUvIj84/NFCp6BFIiUM1nH++vZE3/rE9mH/JR1JeL0nr4ykMdVwJhgTpazJx /Kbrzm5HC/fhDtY2XmnykP/Ai+7zoiFeXWOY0OcXn6fVc7VG9ONQF6T8E3CiXJZOcplM2u EpkoleKnyyL8i8BEpHTyhupLXzm8blpuN0zKfqH09RoQarNC935UyMAVMvrK+A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=PoQKz46p; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=JvmiiJfA; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.36 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=PoQKz46p; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=JvmiiJfA; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 2DE8B87C7 X-Spam-Score: -1.36 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: 9VY2VZYJeaI2 On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 05:32:50PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug rep= orts for GNU Guix wrote: > Guixfriends, >=20 > Errors like the one below are omnipresent. It's a problem. >=20 > Expecting an ever-increasing (16k+?) number of requests to finish flawles= sly > or aborting a very long (20+ minutes here) process is doomed. >=20 > We don't seem to have a plan forward (I include myself!). Looking at oth= er > package managers, a blunt =E2=80=98retry a finite number of times=E2=80= =99 seems common. > Guix's =E2=80=98pretend that "transient" is a magic powerword=E2=80=99 ap= proach less so. >=20 > What do people think? Does the heavy pipelining complicate matters? >=20 > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > ~ $ guix weather --substitute-urls=3Dhttps://guix.tobias.gr I sometimes see similar failures with `guix weather`. To clarify, do you also see them when substituting? Or just when checking for substitutes?