From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id yMIVN8AUJGDcdQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:15:44 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id UIzmMsAUJGBScAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:15:44 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DF869402BD for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35312 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9t5a-0002LO-UP for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:15:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44880) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9skd-0003tJ-BA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:54:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45579) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9skc-0003FP-NC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:54:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9skc-00015R-Mm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46385: User awareness of Anti-Features Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46385 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 46385@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: soheil--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 46385@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46385-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46385.16129760004091 (code B ref 46385); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:54:02 +0000 Received: (at 46385) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2021 16:53:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57117 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9sjw-00013u-Ju for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:53:20 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:59911) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l9sjt-00013U-Iw for 46385@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:53:20 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725F25C01BA; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:53:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:53:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=jv10z+PiM3BQJG+H+Rbt3hyY aVPKU5oRbn0Lthnv9mU=; b=rPQHfXTeC6vo0D0C2g+inF4mh8ti9tkIYIjkbLnf JTuw+d7en0hwTpLtnhT141dCA7bZxnxwGO+X4FBqjsszeibi6PcPJxUSGmqRk+Un uAuMXWncpCfuEWKzGLWYh5fc9ohVCWWKpuKXfMN3Ki36lTw2ofrKrSEdUneytS9P W8o= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=jv10z+ PiM3BQJG+H+Rbt3hyYaVPKU5oRbn0Lthnv9mU=; b=B6z2jH7LuG22QjO6Nx20FI MfqSKiMW40pcEId5hfG3dviWNPl03UwdTeBbyWZnRRiLgprcB+TVAvYrzODa8uDL 2/u+MSA49pSZB01Ri0rQPJJ31l9GEYNcoTOGfY9rXOKYtJz+sA63xPBTaprnFv03 FHXYNGaF6Yny6BKyqJTdIP33In95e4n3zQszUGSBlhRAv8GIyiDmOFzSFiPZvTbw sd4M0LjEzC1YY7w73f8qJfwVQgaa+DNw/KuSptxxKzeUmiyBxruboZwqVlp1zE+K 3Ay+giiYw7vOYucrc9YyphW+5Yej8dWanoYq9EJSffW+57G+seq9/YRo8T8O7j8Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrheejgdelvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgr mhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepueekkedtffdvtddugeejgedtvefhueefiedvjeeitdeigedtveejvdejheffvefg necukfhppedutddtrdduuddrudeiledruddukeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E1BFC24005A; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:53:11 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:53:09 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.36 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=rPQHfXTe; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=B6z2jH7L; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 6DF869402BD X-Spam-Score: -1.36 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: g7EWQOLsxNCh On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 01:28:40PM +0000, soheil--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > Users should be aware of anti-feature of packages. > It is best to have anti-feature tag in anti-feature packages so that user know which program has anti-features; Like F-Droid. Also, user should be aware of anti-feature during installation. And wherever this awareness is needed... I use F-Droid, but I dislike their "anti-feature" messaging. It's not clear to me that it's an example we should follow.