From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id AOU2Arm8CWDXCQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:41:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id GE66Obi8CWATPwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:41:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDFD494042F for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39336 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l2dxG-0000xi-Ow for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:41:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60542) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l2dtH-0005xl-5Y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:37:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47764) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l2dtF-0007NC-OC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:37:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l2dtF-0000vR-Lh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:37:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#45992: A "live" profile is missing Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45992 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 45992-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45992.16112506113539 (code B ref 45992); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:37:01 +0000 Received: (at 45992) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2021 17:36:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59310 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l2dt5-0000v0-12 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:36:51 -0500 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:50865) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l2dt3-0000un-Hp for 45992@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:36:50 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3AE177C; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:36:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:36:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=de1kFhPcMRnu2qkoSCyLJQFMMTi+ApFSaHK/+ce6nUE=; b=GejFmO3jSFFd asbjJdSsZzKStlGUwMnpMvniiXljM0+P6Mn+5ijSa/Ez50YH5eu9ZXiD3bVxGuqt oSq3zBFYHCMrUopkmSxFGJvAgFgZAtdJ1anqPQH6pMS7N0PpIGsPLeRPUHSYpkQD kqR5R1wahFAmuiLIC/6ZTZiQBNGEXxU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=de1kFhPcMRnu2qkoSCyLJQFMMTi+ApFSaHK/+ce6n UE=; b=KzcRGaJFVqQLREUovI4W7Vp2IdwOiOhJrE20GaIrV0gJbLA/dFe/vnxc7 5KIfA1k0TUlYkBAVkUVTmM7SPLkTOMhWISE0T8wUVjrUTwNo+7MH7lI3A6zE5X21 XWbGwXvKqRgZiQcIYCVD6ivNXy0rwozUPqKCfVejl+HGkWgd3VtqsQM5+QdEPGpo DZjCbvXhqLvMjJrc00780cY/T5KyEbM4F2q7PM18f1n6Ku9we0/lCTJQJyLP1B7j oZOTHCHxtdatY+Lvl7D9g60bYsJtZ/zT76ScYjqiw8dBWgR6FJbCYP7hItZdKUWH il7QwtDxhLFL53GfAg2eFOEQkU/DA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudeggddutdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtugfgjgesthekredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepgeejgeeghedtudfgffdutddvffefffejkeffffevffehgedvvdeutdffkeej jeejnecukfhppedutddtrdduuddrudeiledruddukeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpe dtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (pool-100-11-169-118.phlapa.fios.verizon.net [100.11.169.118]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B837D24005A; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:36:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:36:40 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <87zh12a1md.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87zh12a1md.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45992@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.35 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=GejFmO3j; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=KzcRGaJF; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: EDFD494042F X-Spam-Score: -1.35 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: LhjV0VGyIcaG On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 01:57:46PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Could it be that you (1) configured a checkout with the wrong > --localstatedir, (2) started guix-daemon from that checkout, and (3) ran > ‘guix gc’ or equivalent? 1) I could have misconfigured a checkout, although it is unlikely. I don't see any incorrect './configure' invocations in my shell history. 2) I never use the guix-daemon from a Git checkout. Really! I don't even know off-hand where the built guix-daemon is located. I would have to find it. 3) I run `guix gc` several times per week.