From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id gPpdDkVs1l8qXQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 19:32:21 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id yMIpCkVs1l9ReAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 19:32:21 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F16194014B for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 19:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47344 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1koX6Q-0005Hq-Hv for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:32:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57012) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1koX6B-0005HB-5p for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:32:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38748) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1koX6A-000520-51 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:32:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koX6A-0007vo-1m for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:32:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#36544: 'set-paths' should exclude 'source' from consideration Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 19:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36544 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 36544-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36544.160788786330227 (code B ref 36544); Sun, 13 Dec 2020 19:32:02 +0000 Received: (at 36544) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2020 19:31:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50294 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koX5C-0007rS-LJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:31:02 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:42947) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1koX5B-0007qf-7B for 36544@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:31:01 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377365C0040; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:30:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:30:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=3lhy/y+fqoaVRJQiuQyjpuN1QwnpErqWiX6Mchvg5SM=; b=lRVSJQ5fyNDg LAVNDjU3p12U3sHXqhsgs1wVEfiJTj9TG+SDWndip02oY4re0OOXxhCwUIklA7i4 QjUVPjVGK9rlWABbCi9q47IpVib2jEawrvEzSjJSibfr76Xf4D4yDLQZT+1byfnv OTk5OmeXee9VKgIeH4VR9zCZi+zOPdU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=3lhy/y+fqoaVRJQiuQyjpuN1QwnpErqWiX6Mchvg5 SM=; b=PpAQeyzfKAXkcoU50ldXq7o9sbuJuKBjYGwA70v2OPrQfMVHw+pV99b4m Y/h/xto6/81ZyFP3bEKk7Y6yq6tkPZJA06Y7rSvZ+LKy0TaPiOEobdx2JamamNwX XWi+70A3hU3mqRDGJOabNcv7Z2GkxlQ8d0m8OAKKk5O8oTQ2w7W3oIMEDQLqa0Dw N/t5/W8rU8TYhfWklDCAj79ojO9l7jadwSWtnHmGSYEBDRaoMNZKx2WECRCCP3WQ 6LnAYhNpBMX4+XA/pw/pObZeFFRuart+ET8dtQorHvFAmTyG6fWLwxyplI1B3aKv /T7ki7P8UyVY9bj6ccio67cLRomtA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudekiedguddvjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtkeertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefnvgho ucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeegjeeggeehtddugfffuddtvdfffeffjeekffffveffheegvddvuedtffek jeejjeenucfkphepjeefrddugedurdduvdejrddugeeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghm vg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-73-141-127-146.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.141.127.146]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 591BE240057; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:30:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:30:51 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <871rz1a0kr.fsf@netris.org> <87sgrcnu1k.fsf@inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87sgrcnu1k.fsf@inria.fr> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 36544@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.20 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=lRVSJQ5f; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=PpAQeyzf; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4F16194014B X-Spam-Score: 0.20 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: A4qG1ujWH/T9 On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:24:55PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > To avoid this unexpected sensitivity on the source origin method, I > > suggest that we explicitly exclude 'source' from consideration within > > the 'set-paths' phase. What do you think? > > I agree. We should do that in the next ‘core-updates’. Now is a good time to make this change.