From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id wHGdCE/k81/vFQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 04:00:15 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id mG9xBE/k81+/GwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 04:00:15 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87A2D9403C5 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 04:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57712 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwdW0-0004iY-Hi for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 23:00:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46278) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwdVr-0004hr-9m for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 23:00:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49213) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwdVr-0000re-2U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 23:00:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kwdVr-0007rJ-1r for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 23:00:03 -0500 Subject: bug#45559: Cuirass has not successfully evaluated the stagig branch in 3 weeks Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 04:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 45559 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mathieu Othacehe Mail-Followup-To: 45559@debbugs.gnu.org, leo@famulari.name, leo@famulari.name Received: via spool by 45559-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D45559.160981917230125 (code D ref 45559); Tue, 05 Jan 2021 04:00:02 +0000 Received: (at 45559-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2021 03:59:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60757 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kwdVL-0007pp-Mr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 22:59:31 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:37843) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kwdVK-0007pX-O1 for 45559-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 22:59:31 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B155C0181; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 22:59:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 04 Jan 2021 22:59:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=P6ZNVkDdP1AD0rKK9+qie8lC bJ4bAmv4YnivpCe1tuk=; b=g967fHQLd4Vry5eHsN7qfvTH7XWlU3nfe+yd8X9k 6JG6r5l2bd0wqUBB7lAUqpoagPw7wq5ZosjAy+xvzvFngNlxNkB1w2Rwd3raKpIA cgtTkk8V/JB6eoi3+SCvmbOfsXsQJxUt+AmUIwvkKI2Zy3KV8WpOqU8FwJNf1TlF 8bk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=P6ZNVk DdP1AD0rKK9+qie8lCbJ4bAmv4YnivpCe1tuk=; b=HphSY80P3FhAE9Qfvov0So z08DcIO3tk6JGK9iJY00S61yHCdQvNV5Pow9ddlD9fmWNG+rOWTgwyS6sVySaE5G GU5X2ugNf05cGb/oCcU+ZkfKcVtofIgKS9qukeGFrFXhnHFV3TuKAzHI/zVl2U1s BRMussL2rT13IG7rV3dv9P6Iuvo5Mtr33NwclyALFOIJq7BbTqu4sqyULVTku2po NdBHifuWiZzRESi2CdpTFU6aogcEziaXRjY8f/Sec5vXkHWUEFbcuepi5UBdLdVm tjVfn+MuGE/3ybUUKT6brWSq46xznaA2iCqZ3zJ3h9Il0NqF5qcUnVK03Ip3KElg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrvdefgedgieehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvghoucfh rghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeeukeektdffvddtudegjeegtdevhfeufeeivdejiedtieegtdevjedvjeehffev gfenucfkphepjeefrddugedurdduvdejrddugeeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-73-141-127-146.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [73.141.127.146]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E169C24005E; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 22:59:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 22:59:23 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: References: <87lfd9hxf7.fsf@gnu.org> <87ble4ixci.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ble4ixci.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45559-done@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.33 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=g967fHQL; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=HphSY80P; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 87A2D9403C5 X-Spam-Score: -1.33 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: zy+sZ6Jm1DXv On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 03:35:25PM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > I'm currently running: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > (use-modules (gnu ci) (guix)) > (hydra-jobs (open-connection) '()) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > which is replication the evaluation process. Thanks, this was helpful! AFAICT, the evaluation failures were caused by a package collision while building a profile from the zabbix system test. Fixed in 48d8d92c51f64256bba2bdbb2a1027a5fab71a3d