From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id KDusNuiPvWKSNgEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:58:32 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id EF6SNuiPvWLlkgAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:58:32 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 494811F5BD for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 13:58:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45190 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o6soZ-0008PW-6E for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 07:58:31 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o6sgR-0005xO-9f for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 07:50:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39303) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o6sgM-00020r-JT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 07:50:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6sgM-0008PS-HV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 07:50:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#56005: In procedure write_wait_fd: unimplemented References: <87o7yt71sc.fsf@kolabnow.com> In-Reply-To: <87o7yt71sc.fsf@kolabnow.com> Resent-From: Attila Lendvai Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56005 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "56005@debbugs.gnu.org" <56005@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: via spool by 56005-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56005.165658975732230 (code B ref 56005); Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:50:02 +0000 Received: (at 56005) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2022 11:49:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33188 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6sfd-0008Nj-Fh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 07:49:17 -0400 Received: from mail-4018.proton.ch ([185.70.40.18]:23869) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o6sfZ-0008NR-Qn for 56005@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 07:49:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:48:56 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lendvai.name; s=protonmail; t=1656589746; x=1656848946; bh=b63slFz4xDBNv1dJu/m9opfP9lB1o6L/8QHoZknwL8g=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc: Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID; b=df7U1Yq2+5u6AeA9J9vr/0Cre9uT4Zttbt0wsEvqlwHx3Rz+9ojFTTdcrLEnkbHIL Lx5JHErtWDH+1oHHaNLEOQP4JTmFjzuOqC5kwmDQGk0sSB9YsV9IjpfDYlkhZ6+akM Y1ozFkMeqeNrSFNEDKvKJgx7sMUiO3hGHc44PljJeKFWdpTFRAVHtY80aLRTCoKM+g OrpjPujUyv/zb5yDkZQxKTWpXReV+cUc9H19bNF2YzHjuV7D1JzJ1vzb/LFTXKGVxl ZXL1WI9RkEdzwmXEtGGSQmcgHJEqjNlku/Gz5VBt0F/OiiGibEytXbp+vJ1sD+pTRU n2OtlqJUde7ww== From: Attila Lendvai Message-ID: Feedback-ID: 28384833:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Attila Lendvai Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1656590312; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=b63slFz4xDBNv1dJu/m9opfP9lB1o6L/8QHoZknwL8g=; b=kVJ8+t0GVKMKd0Uqd5KlsGf6vub6EdJk2gyJ11+veWZuJ821wEStVVr9GuOpe+bxCLIZXQ hS7f++Csq0MUpwIOy1Bu4ErHAyRn41S8X/DIqoqQyzW7EeDdRzIpuVYVTcFuuBppZvDGhB piEHwQQqy2b8dE6dc+fk+wSicjxhyRAar1z7e+QijbO+ARogrq2w8FUN5dcGGIOeghFZ0e Q1icDIspA1p+LfSIc0wEQlIbF3g+shxWHLscYj7PuaTyfFEplSrz3c1/xYudSPMdz/sjTC 8VFe0PZppw9FObHzy9bTe5p0oNHhbX7JMX1iz9PtuHFDeNtUuBXkyrpAXDtJPw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1656590312; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=KnZIpQWgzlFOa8i9j/RxU5qpv1saVAyGIbpLB4TOw8XYm+3J7gX0rxmz2BmInCTGLNKrbn JpwXHMkZSYH+fypQuE1wWCJTD1yikXsxHZNbwLiKqQo+L2K9zOJeJR0uXmAMA/zCIWn0jD i9eZavm8AWa0bdlVDIWDPEWPm+OqebNGZillW1agULkitsF+5PCd2fJiwaA6H0goagJJds +Tm23D6S6gWyvTrgebF7SbmhlO59KqN5ToTHAT6/iD34ZIUgvIZoz/L0Hw3iqHpG66h7eU F7AUuPpwUbEGL9p8AWwe36u+VcLGUV7w697HBSKM7Ff3PwkTlySpXqWjGV+zng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lendvai.name header.s=protonmail header.b=df7U1Yq2; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 1.95 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lendvai.name header.s=protonmail header.b=df7U1Yq2; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 494811F5BD X-Spam-Score: 1.95 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: GMQmrishvTeE i'm also seeing this every once in a while. some speculation: my router has QoS set up that limits the upstream, so tha= t i avoid triggering my ISP's rate limiter, because it sends ping into the = ballpark of seconds. maybe because of this config i'm seeing this more regularly than others? - attila