From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0BnjLRl7zGCFJQEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 12:53:13 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id OLhFKRl7zGBqcwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 10:53:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F37EE9F1C for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 12:53:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56460 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1luC7a-0002wx-Em for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 06:53:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37136) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1luC7S-0002wg-CK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 06:53:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44351) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1luC7S-0002DU-33 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 06:53:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luC7R-0006ZS-OG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 06:53:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#48963: "guix build guix" halts after exhausting memory Resent-From: Julien Lepiller Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 10:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48963 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 48963-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48963.162401354625208 (code B ref 48963); Fri, 18 Jun 2021 10:53:01 +0000 Received: (at 48963) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2021 10:52:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55897 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luC6s-0006YV-EU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 06:52:26 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:45056) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luC6q-0006YL-8W for 48963@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 06:52:25 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 30a8b5e4; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 10:52:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from:message-id; s= dkim; bh=TacGd9rR4FjT2g3n1tDQbGVUBGlANEr/QPt+JI4y7pM=; b=eKuF7w3 1movNZBW36lzKj7/zxxaVQaELfEOCt4C5jSMHYHL/2aW/fT37t+nx/Tj3obLpR8v IMPgPdK1qXxK11bqolZsaFOR4gfwd0ZBjzrqNoZcQOpIHjC6n7JvPzH3aV/fr9wE hRUdUogAfcgwJ2tj2dKi6OC+b1B8NrKhKVn1wyxNy11dmC/JuxpKVcJ921doDVzp dee3qqykRLwZujz+xCwmpGs1l7CGxJxEt0NdaXwT+NDcKEfel1a+J/ZRK/cZUntb PXq+iZhE3zNItrJCbjGKJaOqyazlLD8No5iYIoq+n3B5o2Hu13SI/A4g3XgyFfw7 szz3vr73nJlNNMw== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id b8fa5b4b (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 18 Jun 2021 10:52:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 06:52:10 -0400 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <87lf77h565.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210612002330.64cd06c1@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> <87im2dpoj3.fsf@gnu.org> <78EA8A84-D7DC-4506-91EB-1C304E5DB363@lepiller.eu> <20210618001737.105e2e5a@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> <87lf77h565.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----KC6XKW7O2H5R9MJ3QW9NP54CTSPIQ1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 48963@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1624013593; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=TacGd9rR4FjT2g3n1tDQbGVUBGlANEr/QPt+JI4y7pM=; b=NcYHBH4bIi9b16CYtpEahAzqVWRjCq56DJjfXZKSJzjfkh4MaGGPgBiWvvx6g1TqMU0PvM i1EMyshUFuSmKVoDrXYycTR3F5q2QJHsGH/It0JQ7KRUHe0QsSk3I7odNkBaPBlSkkz59G uLHfOp4xZ/ojblZqby+BRNL363gzj9xiHpLzv8lhefx4raFlO1fVhTm9q6xCz8XfxxSx8X BU/73o0Ha+dbAtz4uw1HMzANYwoGXsxw4BmVzC3riY0wXO368I7OLD/VN5o5HibWvIIzXX YcqdcKxcKKBXPJdgs1Ei8AhLDFTrPIjja0NY94RMrSJXoLkh336VsaAN/Lc6zQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1624013593; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=K+JRRNE6TF+XNTPGcyRvQP/4v+P3lHqrEuIWYkZEcsJncQf9VeKF17EuWUmHVxiDoF0WOn IdEf/F3iYcvSEBN/RS25Q9S78fU7asuol0b6IkfIxZjYqxt9DCzakkIIueQDPWnwFAYQke i1QMX9L9H8IOrJA/tKgmfNrh8QaaDrK/wuhEPW58aON9lXzK6V8Q+j0hygFodWSDJdZk3X f5epYR2jsCkNPWFeOuBSHmyPuPyNl9ilXINq2a9Q7WAMUyAGCZ26cFZWCE39jWCCpBBGVw KFBjlTcWlTln/DtjMt76yThfO28DKfeixrpqs/m7uXdIZ1Gm4mtpUPLFMUKYsg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lepiller.eu header.s=dkim header.b="eKuF7w3 "; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.33 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lepiller.eu header.s=dkim header.b="eKuF7w3 "; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=lepiller.eu (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: F37EE9F1C X-Spam-Score: -1.33 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: Dxx6ULLWccU6 ------KC6XKW7O2H5R9MJ3QW9NP54CTSPIQ1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No, the _test_ failure is consistent=2E The build itself now always complet= es, which is much better that before=2E Le 18 juin 2021 05:51:14 GMT-04:00, "Ludovic Court=C3=A8s" a =C3=A9crit : >Hi, > >Julien Lepiller skribis: > >> Le Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:58:09 -0400, >> Julien Lepiller a =C3=A9crit : >> >>> Hi Ludo, >>>=20 >>> I tried your patch by creating a variant of the guix package=2E My >>> first attempt was a failure because it's still using almost all my >>> memory and I forgot to enable my swap=2E In the second attempt, the >>> build phase succeeded, but the build failed during the test phase >>> (test/inferior)=2E I've started a new build hoping it's a >>> non-deterministic failure=2E >> >> I'm afraid after testing 2 more times that the test failure is >> happening consistently, at least of armhf=2E > >(The _build_ failure, right?) > >Have you been able to see how this affects max RSS? > >Does it go any further than without the patch? > >Thanks, >Ludo=E2=80=99=2E ------KC6XKW7O2H5R9MJ3QW9NP54CTSPIQ1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No, the _test_ failure is consistent=2E The build = itself now always completes, which is much better that before=2E

Le 18 juin 2021 05:51:14 GMT-04:00, "Ludovic Court= =C3=A8s" <ludo@gnu=2Eorg> a =C3=A9crit :
Hi,

Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller=2Eeu&=
gt; skribis:

 Le Th=
u, 17 Jun 2021 09:58:09 -0400,
 Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller=2Eeu=
> a =C3=A9crit :

Hi Ludo,

I tried your patch by creating a variant of the guix packa=
ge=2E My
first attempt was a failure because it's still using almost all=
 my
memory and I forgot to enable my swap=2E In the second attempt, the<=
br>build phase succeeded, but the build failed during the test phase
(te=
st/inferior)=2E I've started a new build hoping it's a
non-deterministic=
 failure=2E

 I'm afraid after testing 2 more times that=
 the test failure is
 happening consistently, at least of armhf=2E

(The _build_ failure, right?)

Have you been able to s=
ee how this affects max RSS?

Does it go any further than without the=
 patch?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99=2E
------KC6XKW7O2H5R9MJ3QW9NP54CTSPIQ1--