From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id GLKSL/37rGXh6wAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 12:11:57 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id GLKSL/37rGXh6wAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 12:11:57 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=techchud.xyz header.s=mail header.b=FppsiGzc; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1705835517; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=iPJHPqF0WfbxBj09UB6OClQRdLuKUpGkFIVO7CPxnnE=; b=TQWJuz+Jm00yea0RNglpK1iky6gqZXath/S69bbEljCbxBvQZgThENNsiuPMPyt6/YSfhP Pu41OfB2J18ym3MdB7Vd723UYTt5ne07JyqyhfOJYFsJ3LiREm818WTn7IYfMEtAGBQNfU pS11Ctn6vJU8nB+I4mI1IjAJXOWm96qtgdFYikZP5wOvqBJGU4RQwj35McZdMVW+BoHjZt m52W2jKujXcHUvjo6qBLYc0orsRjuvqFSEd3fL6iZoe40HA9xDa+fqfMi4N+x3bQXx6CPC o/re6527X/6mZ/PhcAn8johIAbVS7YfGLjhIF1XzHjE4nwIZRbdk3n1oWr8Pmw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=techchud.xyz header.s=mail header.b=FppsiGzc; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1705835517; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=BMZ8ho6edWSI/Avt5/89qblcmhqmm1CXNw3cVF1Q6MOz5BKDyg98CVQHuJu0mN1fr5XrcN 4YRwyqnwOid/dKO05HRwlc3IeYX7ghLhQDx/kD7rQ5UugBd5pAq/NrQngxIWFV8EIPlemy vZ8e5dNFhnqFD8txQ1OTLAEZh9mokjyqGGQloMegkIlY0JeYcugRi+QCXmUr9gehB9tW2U ILLhdBsv7TB67CPwhQ5UuVfD0UTQ6uMRUtbu6LuGHgtMk9YCt0lHaikKFAT9sSnvlNJhkt Ift1p5cnIYEZ7idWZKjnTLv36t/pGX6FtoyWKPqT85lPntBDPeoFN6Cr0hugtA== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B3B525CC9 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 12:11:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRVjo-0006g6-IO; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:11:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRScZ-0003JF-Np for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 02:52:00 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRScZ-0006EU-GB for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 02:51:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rRScc-0006WR-O6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 02:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#68628: `guix pull` fails due to with-grafts in GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS Resent-From: "msglm" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 07:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 68628 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 68628@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.170582351325034 (code B ref -1); Sun, 21 Jan 2024 07:52:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jan 2024 07:51:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36475 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rRScS-0006Vc-1A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2024 02:51:52 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:33058) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rRLLT-0007KC-OC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 19:05:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRLLK-0008J7-R9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 19:05:42 -0500 Received: from techchud.xyz ([2001:19f0:6401:770:5400:3ff:feee:3207]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rRLLI-0001wV-Ps for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 19:05:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=techchud.xyz; s=mail; t=1705795535; bh=iPJHPqF0WfbxBj09UB6OClQRdLuKUpGkFIVO7CPxnnE=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:From; b=FppsiGzcDLXOpF2GeYdN4zrsDOfgSx9RoXlld1D1KynZL43EluIuuTYRhEwslwAnJ a28M3zCC2kDDjNfvwWJjIiYTCiPd+FCF/taQ0S8nqbXB8dU3RB8UgArYuyyH69Gz91 ObxOO8z1n8DVaJU8EgY+O4w7hAXFTE3c74TJGsUprSOGM5PePI//YY1AROVLt/U9GA OvXuwhS6EMRr0emy9P5ioHnGWK9/a+cONzKtIBjCNEmMRZO4YDThRnSqKxfFO2G1iL CcQPar6zhPS9v5qKsU5QYk2d4TtJsD27zi8scV0ozS2kiO1/WFpxoHLPGzbVnVPMN7 kCR0sNEL5iG8A== Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 18:05:33 -0600 Message-Id: X-Mailer: aerc 0.15.2 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:19f0:6401:770:5400:3ff:feee:3207; envelope-from=msglm@techchud.xyz; helo=techchud.xyz X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 02:51:45 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 21 Jan 2024 06:11:26 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: "msglm" From: "msglm" via Bug reports for GNU Guix Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.67 X-Spam-Score: -4.67 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7B3B525CC9 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: 3t3tzitemwVM When I invoke `guix pull` when `GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS` contains a call for `--with-graft`, `guix pull` fails due to `with-graft` not being a valid option for `guix pull`: Command-line transcript: guix pull guix pull: error: with-graft=3Dgnutls=3Dgnutls@3.5.4: unrecognized option Having `guix pull` ignore `GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS` may be a hack fix, but it could break other people's workflows since `guix pull` has some options for building (i.e: `--cores` and `--no-grafts`). Suggestions: Adding `with-graft` support to guix pull (if that's even applicable).=20 Having guix-pull just ignore the option and return a warning.=20 Split up GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS into a per-command set of flags (i.e: GUIX_BUILD_OPTIONS_PULL).