From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id uEGJOxTTz2IDewEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 10:25:57 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id SBRjOxTTz2IbLwEAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 10:25:56 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBB5FB9EB for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 10:25:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34688 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oBuAV-000365-R8 for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 04:25:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oBtAg-0001Yd-OZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 03:22:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54726) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oBtAg-0000m8-6w for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 03:22:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oBtAg-0007Fs-2m for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 03:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#42553: python-gevent is broken on i686-linux (tests fail) Resent-From: Jakub =?UTF-8?Q?K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 07:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42553 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "Maxim Cournoyer" Cc: 42553-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 42553-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D42553.165778328327819 (code D ref 42553); Thu, 14 Jul 2022 07:22:02 +0000 Received: (at 42553-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jul 2022 07:21:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48618 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oBtA3-0007Ed-Lz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 03:21:23 -0400 Received: from otis.linlux.net ([65.21.219.100]:44017) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oBtA1-0007ES-8G for 42553-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 03:21:21 -0400 X-Hashcash: 1:23:220714:g::an7rTqngPcoJiM6p:jhYo Received: (qmail 9988 invoked by uid 1008); 14 Jul 2022 09:21:13 +0200 X-Qmailux-Diagnostics: from 77-255-178-150.adsl.inetia.pl (kuba@kadziolka.net@77-255-178-150.adsl.inetia.pl) by otis10 (envelope-from , uid 1001) with qmail-scanner-2.11st (clamdscan: 0.103.3/26600. spamassassin: 3.4.6. perlscan: 2.11st. Clear:RC:1(77.255.178.150):. Processed in 0.005783 secs); 14 Jul 2022 07:21:13 -0000 Received: from 77-255-178-150.adsl.inetia.pl (HELO localhost) (kuba@kadziolka.net@77.255.178.150) by otis.linlux.net with SMTP; 14 Jul 2022 09:21:13 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 09:21:53 +0200 Message-Id: From: Jakub =?UTF-8?Q?K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= X-Mailer: aerc 0.10.0 References: <20200726183503.pu7ll2fzm4a6bf5h@gravity> <8735zpwa1u.fsf@gmail.com> <87leswzaaz.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87leswzaaz.fsf@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 04:25:32 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1657787156; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=eTYVhy/bAwLZBzraZ5FOFO/93Q9rQ63+R1+zjDgFDUc=; b=rfmjplEQfG+4DuhSN4z/xocTaD9tX8jlMJWinlW64bz4+9DFWrTXvRpKXYet0UuHV9p/OU K5kYc6N8I980WcmyIohkm3oNdCWEy1c+pEgYv2Wu5mw6SAke0sm//v/tyIR2hmfCSPyvtV wguIKmCtzcaZiCthdYE3w5eI/FQQPLBgb+tUOVSB23NMd6WR/p+KC3Zp0TgBSxpLsOsTQd EFDkycGHJS88Oi2dCmFkCkgpG6e6fs1NjUNemZKoP0B//8WnVCobwkIjmptMsF3YIZoHJJ hba0yWbott4dmIeSWQJtgYeWqc37UO/0ZjOHU6TNnrpV1vqQ1lWY+jzCpiS7sQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1657787156; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=EkTJhpkcY0LhdaaP5ZStwXqhCpl5XZlUf4z4vp8O0+FkgBjReXLfKfJCzWGfvev9RfRwQV SlbTSOy33X7v2DeaUkUANgqhi6ykjHXnJl3aWRbdbY041usnE4+FdXib5OWiulR0i0mGfM RAqK0ln+dAXXY2mRQWKc5YypEiaC1tD8DSPevzUA8zad7ahKyUzEFfsxKfqMszT262zwxF yYp4JyB+paQ/ia+vikQjIce9VK4Hluv2hchpn2xlTyTHNAKowQKjMwuPX880oPk6QzrL7N 5JkE8U83ubaxzUCSWCoaDfuUaxph8wH384HDFp2RY96+1KvYlGsIdNO2yBfJPg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.44 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: BBB5FB9EB X-Spam-Score: -2.44 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 7jTgqvvVZwz8 On Thu Jul 14, 2022 at 4:40 AM CEST, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Finally disabled the test in 692c2ad327. > > Closing. Are we sure this is the appropriate course of action? It sounds like the test is exposing a bug in our packaging that might affect users of python-gevent. It might be better to have the package build than not, of course, but still we might want to investigate why the test fails. Regards, Kuba