From: Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: 27257@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#27257: python-apsw bundles a version of SQLite
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 01:50:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPsKtfJNs_w8Z0O-ScoWcU6XWGGqR6kcTp0OCttWKbv3wgtnYg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170605192724.51a810de@scratchpost.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1562 bytes --]
2017-06-05 19:27 GMT+02:00 Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>:
> Hi Jelle,
>
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 18:32:10 +0200
> Jelle Licht <jlicht@fsfe.org> wrote:
>
> > Some possible directions on resolving this issue:
> > - Debug the multiple thousand lines of test code to see exactly where/how
> > the test fails when using the system SQLite library
> > - Package the right version of the SQLite amalgation [1] that is now
> > bundled, although the amalgation should be functionally equivalent to the
> > normal SQLite version.
>
> I see that apsw bundles SQLite 3.9.2. Does it work when you replace it
> with the external version 3.9.2 - amalgation or not ?
>
Getting version 3.9.2 to build turned out to be a bit of a hassle; some
nonsense about a fossil(?) generated manifest missing or what not.
>
> I don't necessarily mean permanently - just to find out whether the tests
> work normally then.
>
> Also, Perhaps diff the bundled SQLite 3.9.2 and the released SQLite 3.9.2
> amalgation of the same version ?
>
A diff between bundled SQLite 3.9.2 and release 3.9.2. amalgation reveals
no (functional) differences, so at least there will be no extra set of
patches to maintain.
> [...]
>
It seems that the actual upstream for apsw at [1] has continued development
since we packaged it.
Incidentally, our sqlite package is a bit outdated. If I update sqlite to
the latest version (3.20.1), as well as change the python-apsw upstream to
[1], the package seems to build and pass the `check' phase with no issues.
[1] : https://github.com/rogerbinns/apsw
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2515 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-10 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-05 16:32 bug#27257: python-apsw bundles a version of SQLite Jelle Licht
2017-06-05 17:27 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2017-09-10 23:50 ` Jelle Licht [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPsKtfJNs_w8Z0O-ScoWcU6XWGGqR6kcTp0OCttWKbv3wgtnYg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jlicht@fsfe.org \
--cc=27257@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=dannym@scratchpost.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).