From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id sDD1Ac7iq19eKwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:10:38 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 8EdNOc3iq1/mRAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:10:37 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A1AB9402A9 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56072 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcptU-0005FE-2e for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:10:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcpry-0003BB-8P for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:09:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcprx-0000yi-UV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:09:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcprx-0003IX-PW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:09:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44558: Mesa isn't update to date Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Barnab=C3=A1s_?= =?UTF-8?Q?B=C3=A9res?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44558 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Received: via spool by 44558-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44558.160510010612629 (code B ref 44558); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:09:01 +0000 Received: (at 44558) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2020 13:08:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40530 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcprO-0003Hd-C3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:08:26 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f43.google.com ([209.85.208.43]:36613) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kcprL-0003HN-SG for 44558@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:08:25 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f43.google.com with SMTP id o20so2235977eds.3 for <44558@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 05:08:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nf8tOg6gpZY5Ke748YKOqKZOiiTJ67w/GKjF1XK2bws=; b=JBOHlQANlEVyCRHeow93A8sskiE2J2leROKtsQf6QpRuZrBfDfCMgOoacpL/JXPLmT fJe913jx6wAwAmTkUkejLVuvZutsXyDH9z5ENz1F5H0dl+WmS9J/Hkkl4EaORA2b3z/q ce2h9USvvBcxTwk895kPNqn7aIm9kfqk11f4fpoyfvc7Nsr+9m4+KYVDu+G4+hNz7fNn ADzvcWTx9xwanAVWpZV/Kq5KrA1NDJAoAfQyNCQjG3Vku2YWtHs3k/F5zfWRB+0C16Zu nS9q8318w/YiSkwJ+8wOr1/SYVGyceMShtNGX7B5tpP9O97FcBbV9xzPeGte2H/9fS8B vyIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nf8tOg6gpZY5Ke748YKOqKZOiiTJ67w/GKjF1XK2bws=; b=mylQgdZh93h5TZ1TScY/LaelbW6dJ9mcOQaeVcQNR1TkODhiMf7PjAUz38aVzEEjJ3 Sj6CUg4V86mPC+M8AwV+j8d+2UeMP2f+OHHgKSY7uTQaUanTyU1v4/86ksczVB32vkik faSkwosQBzEuNch34+UHOLOc0YIEblWTXQiA5eEwSOEmoo91GwOKCTFG1ETZg5DKyCvi +0CEwGfBb0AjaAVNrdk8dZTUmJO4KuAaYyi100QVEDnwjvy+GHAmJoAOTGhJy1D/RiLC 0ttsI2iNqz/tBeyErEHsSYIERoB4C6BKasyVHhsqqxaTtRNA+HtcR08e72adopswcOLP Tc5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533O839ita4p0MU6xEr10bSTjslb1OgYPYaaOpAjL6zdX60Rbrdl S2F2i6O35flxwas0OdmHy6oTFTyENrbIzmCvGcM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxPss2nFhTP+sAqNb547ruf/ijP9clWHHKgGyHWwpN0WCP7xtKKA3N0hiwg4bgyMMiJvZj3IFAEXB/Xkq4zqQc= X-Received: by 2002:a50:b5e1:: with SMTP id a88mr4994354ede.5.1605100098001; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 05:08:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87k0ushyi7.fsf@nckx> In-Reply-To: <87k0ushyi7.fsf@nckx> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Barnab=C3=A1s_?= =?UTF-8?Q?B=C3=A9res?= Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:08:24 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002b9d8d05b3d47de5" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 44558@debbugs.gnu.org, romulasry Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=JBOHlQAN; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: dSqWZOpCxD1c --0000000000002b9d8d05b3d47de5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes it marked as a patch Tobias Geerinckx-Rice ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2020. nov= . 11., Sze, 13:24): > Hullo! > > Barnab=C3=A1s B=C3=A9res =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > I think this email went to the wrong place, because you only > > sent a "bug > > report" not a patch. I think it's better to send these kind of > > things to > > bug-guix@gnu.org > > Does your mail client mark it as a patch? Strange. I've deleted > the original, but bug-guix@ delivered the list copy to my inbox > and I don't see =E2=80=98patches=E2=80=99 in the header. > > That said, it's not really a bug report either, or the bug is > missing... > > Romulasry, are you suffering from specific Mesa 20.0.7 problems > that 20.2.2 might fix? Please let us know. An otherwise working > package not being at the latest upstream version isn't a bug. > > romulasry via Bug reports for GNU Guix =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > Mesa 20.2.2 is released > > The core-updates branch updates Mesa to 20.1.9. Would you like to > submit a (tested) core-updates patch updating it to 20.2.2? > > > Also it would be nice to see it built with lllvm 11 > > Same for this! All help is appreciated. > > Kind regards, > > T G-R > --=20 Barnus --0000000000002b9d8d05b3d47de5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes it marked as a patch

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: = 2020. nov. 11., Sze, 13:24):
Hullo!

Barnab=C3=A1s B=C3=A9res =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
> I think this email went to the wrong place, because you only
> sent a "bug
> report" not a patch. I think it's better to send these kind o= f
> things to
> bug-guix@gnu.org=

Does your mail client mark it as a patch?=C2=A0 Strange.=C2=A0 I've del= eted
the original, but bug-guix@ delivered the list copy to my inbox
and I don't see =E2=80=98patches=E2=80=99 in the header.

That said, it's not really a bug report either, or the bug is
missing...

Romulasry, are you suffering from specific Mesa 20.0.7 problems
that 20.2.2 might fix?=C2=A0 Please let us know.=C2=A0 An otherwise working=
package not being at the latest upstream version isn't a bug.

romulasry via Bug reports for GNU Guix =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
> Mesa 20.2.2 is released

The core-updates branch updates Mesa to 20.1.9.=C2=A0 Would you like to submit a (tested) core-updates patch updating it to 20.2.2?

> Also it would be nice to see it built with lllvm 11

Same for this!=C2=A0 All help is appreciated.

Kind regards,

T G-R


--
Barnus
--0000000000002b9d8d05b3d47de5--